Protecting Federated Learning from Extreme Model Poisoning Attacks via Multidimensional Time Series Anomaly Detection

Overview

• The paper introduces a novel defense mechanism called FLANDERS to mitigate large-scale model poisoning attacks in federated learning (FL) systems.
• FLANDERS treats the sequence of local models sent by clients in each FL round as a matrix-valued time series.
• It identifies malicious client updates as outliers in this time series by comparing actual observations with estimates generated by a matrix autoregressive forecasting model.
• Experiments show that FLANDERS significantly improves robustness across a wide spectrum of attacks when paired with standard and robust existing aggregation methods.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning (FL) is a way to train AI models without sharing the raw data from individual users or devices. In this approach, each participant trains the model on their own data and sends the updated model to a central server, which then aggregates the updates to improve the overall model. However, this system is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks where malicious participants send intentionally corrupted model updates to sabotage the training process.

The paper introduces a new defense mechanism called FLANDERS to address this issue. FLANDERS treats the sequence of local model updates sent by each client as a time series and uses a forecasting model to identify anomalies or outliers in this data. By detecting and removing these malicious updates, FLANDERS helps the central server maintain a robust and accurate model, even when a large number of participants are trying to attack the system.

The key idea is to use a statistical technique called matrix autoregressive modeling to predict what the next local model update should look like based on the previous updates. If an actual update deviates significantly from the prediction, it is likely to be a malicious attack and can be filtered out before aggregation.

The authors show through extensive experiments that FLANDERS can effectively mitigate a wide range of model poisoning attacks, even when the majority of participants are trying to sabotage the system. This is a significant improvement over existing defenses, which tend to break down when the number of attackers is very large.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces FLANDERS, a novel pre-aggregation filter for federated learning (FL) that is resilient to large-scale model poisoning attacks. FLANDERS treats the sequence of local models sent by clients in each FL round as a matrix-valued time series and identifies malicious client updates as outliers in this time series.

Specifically, FLANDERS maintains a matrix autoregressive (MAR) forecasting model at the server. This model learns to predict the next local model update based on the previous updates received from each client. FLANDERS then compares the actual local model updates received from clients to the predictions made by the MAR model. Updates that deviate significantly from the predictions are flagged as potential attacks and removed before the server aggregates the updates.

The authors evaluate FLANDERS on several non-i.i.d. FL setups and show that it significantly improves robustness against a wide spectrum of model poisoning attacks, including precision-guided attacks, GAN-based attacks, and backdoor attacks. FLANDERS maintains high model performance even when the number of malicious clients far exceeds the number of legitimate participants.

The key advantage of FLANDERS is its ability to detect and remove malicious updates without requiring any assumptions about the attack strategy or the fraction of malicious clients. By modeling the temporal dynamics of local model updates, FLANDERS can identify anomalies that deviate from the expected behavior, making it a robust defense against a wide range of attacks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of FLANDERS and demonstrates its effectiveness in mitigating model poisoning attacks in federated learning. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. The paper assumes that the server has full knowledge of the local model updates from all clients in each round. In a realistic FL setting, the server may only have access to a subset of the client updates due to factors like client availability or communication constraints. It would be important to evaluate the performance of FLANDERS under such partial information scenarios.

2. The paper focuses on attacks targeting the model parameters directly. It would be valuable to explore the effectiveness of FLANDERS against data poisoning attacks, where the goal is to corrupt the training data rather than the model updates.

3. The paper does not provide a theoretical analysis of the convergence and stability properties of the matrix autoregressive forecasting model used in FLANDERS. Such an analysis could help provide stronger theoretical guarantees about the defense mechanism's robustness.

4. The experiments in the paper are limited to specific non-i.i.d. FL setups. It would be helpful to understand how FLANDERS performs in a wider range of real-world FL scenarios, such as those with highly skewed data distributions or dynamic client populations.

Overall, the FLANDERS defense mechanism represents a promising approach to enhancing the security of federated learning systems against model poisoning attacks. Further research addressing the identified limitations could lead to even more robust and practical defenses for this important problem.

Conclusion

The paper introduces FLANDERS, a novel pre-aggregation filter for federated learning that is resilient to large-scale model poisoning attacks. FLANDERS treats the sequence of local model updates from clients as a matrix-valued time series and uses a matrix autoregressive forecasting model to identify malicious updates as outliers. Experiments show that FLANDERS significantly improves the robustness of federated learning systems against a wide range of attacks, even when the majority of clients are malicious.

This work represents an important advancement in the field of secure federated learning, as it provides a defense mechanism that can maintain model performance in the face of large-scale adversarial attacks. By leveraging statistical techniques to detect anomalous behavior, FLANDERS offers a promising approach to enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of federated learning systems, which are increasingly being deployed in critical applications like autonomous driving and healthcare. Further research building on this work could lead to even more robust and practical defenses against emerging threats in federated learning.