Data Limitations for Modeling Top-Down Effects on Drivers' Attention

Read original: arXiv:2404.08749 - Published 4/16/2024 by Iuliia Kotseruba, John K. Tsotsos
Total Score

0

Data Limitations for Modeling Top-Down Effects on Drivers' Attention

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines data limitations for modeling top-down effects on drivers' attention
  • Focuses on challenges in capturing the influence of task context and driver state on gaze behavior
  • Highlights the need for more comprehensive datasets to enable robust modeling of these complex, real-world phenomena

Plain English Explanation

This research paper explores the challenges of modeling how a driver's attention is influenced by factors beyond just the visual scene in front of them. When we drive, our focus isn't solely on the road - it's also affected by the task we're trying to accomplish (like navigating to a destination), our current state (like being tired or distracted), and other top-down cognitive processes.

The researchers argue that existing datasets used to study driver attention often don't capture these important contextual factors well enough. For example, most datasets only record where a driver is looking, without detailed information about their goals, mental state, or the broader driving scenario. This makes it difficult to develop accurate models of how all these different elements shape a driver's gaze and attention.

To address this, the paper calls for the creation of more comprehensive datasets that can better represent the complex, real-world factors that influence how drivers allocate their attention. With richer data, researchers may be able to build more robust and realistic models of human attention and behavior behind the wheel. This could lead to important advancements in areas like driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicle technology.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by reviewing related work on modeling the influence of task context and driver state on gaze behavior. It highlights challenges in capturing these top-down effects using existing driver attention tracking datasets.

The core of the paper then examines the characteristics of commonly used datasets for this domain. The authors find that most datasets lack detailed annotations of the driving task, driver state, and other contextual factors that shape attention. This makes it difficult to model the causal relationships between these high-level concepts and low-level gaze patterns.

The paper argues that overcoming these data limitations is crucial for developing robust models of top-down effects on driver attention. It calls for the creation of more comprehensive datasets that capture a richer set of contextual variables beyond just eye tracking. Such datasets could enable significant advancements in areas like driver assistance and autonomous vehicles.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises valid concerns about the current state of driver attention datasets and the challenges this poses for modeling complex, real-world phenomena. The authors correctly identify the need for more detailed annotations of task context, driver state, and other high-level factors that influence gaze behavior.

However, the paper does not provide much insight into the practical difficulties of collecting such comprehensive datasets in natural driving environments. Instrumenting vehicles with the necessary sensors and getting participants to consent to extensive data collection raises significant logistical and ethical hurdles.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential techniques for inferring latent contextual variables from more readily available data sources. For example, could driver state be estimated from sensors like cameras, steering input, and vehicle telemetry? Addressing these implementation challenges could strengthen the paper's arguments and provide a clearer path forward.

Overall, the researchers raise an important issue that merits further investigation. Overcoming data limitations is a critical step toward building accurate models of top-down effects on attention, with broad implications for driver assistance, autonomous vehicles, and beyond.

Conclusion

This paper highlights key limitations in existing datasets for modeling how a driver's attention is shaped by factors beyond just the visual scene. The researchers argue that the lack of detailed annotations around driving tasks, driver state, and other contextual variables makes it difficult to capture the complex, top-down processes that influence gaze behavior.

To address this, the paper calls for the creation of more comprehensive datasets that can better represent the real-world factors affecting driver attention. With richer data, researchers may be able to develop more robust and realistic models of human attention allocation behind the wheel. This could lead to important advancements in areas like driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicle technology.

While the paper raises valid concerns, it could be strengthened by further exploring the practical challenges of collecting such detailed datasets and potential techniques for inferring latent contextual variables. Nonetheless, the core issue identified is an important one that deserves continued attention from the research community.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Data Limitations for Modeling Top-Down Effects on Drivers' Attention
Total Score

0

Data Limitations for Modeling Top-Down Effects on Drivers' Attention

Iuliia Kotseruba, John K. Tsotsos

Driving is a visuomotor task, i.e., there is a connection between what drivers see and what they do. While some models of drivers' gaze account for top-down effects of drivers' actions, the majority learn only bottom-up correlations between human gaze and driving footage. The crux of the problem is lack of public data with annotations that could be used to train top-down models and evaluate how well models of any kind capture effects of task on attention. As a result, top-down models are trained and evaluated on private data and public benchmarks measure only the overall fit to human data. In this paper, we focus on data limitations by examining four large-scale public datasets, DR(eye)VE, BDD-A, MAAD, and LBW, used to train and evaluate algorithms for drivers' gaze prediction. We define a set of driving tasks (lateral and longitudinal maneuvers) and context elements (intersections and right-of-way) known to affect drivers' attention, augment the datasets with annotations based on the said definitions, and analyze the characteristics of data recording and processing pipelines w.r.t. capturing what the drivers see and do. In sum, the contributions of this work are: 1) quantifying biases of the public datasets, 2) examining performance of the SOTA bottom-up models on subsets of the data involving non-trivial drivers' actions, 3) linking shortcomings of the bottom-up models to data limitations, and 4) recommendations for future data collection and processing. The new annotations and code for reproducing the results is available at https://github.com/ykotseruba/SCOUT.

Read more

4/16/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Understanding and Modeling the Effects of Task and Context on Drivers' Gaze Allocation

Iuliia Kotseruba, John K. Tsotsos

To further advance driver monitoring and assistance systems, it is important to understand how drivers allocate their attention, in other words, where do they tend to look and why. Traditionally, factors affecting human visual attention have been divided into bottom-up (involuntary attraction to salient regions) and top-down (driven by the demands of the task being performed). Although both play a role in directing drivers' gaze, most of the existing models for drivers' gaze prediction apply techniques developed for bottom-up saliency and do not consider influences of the drivers' actions explicitly. Likewise, common driving attention benchmarks lack relevant annotations for drivers' actions and the context in which they are performed. Therefore, to enable analysis and modeling of these factors for drivers' gaze prediction, we propose the following: 1) we correct the data processing pipeline used in DR(eye)VE to reduce noise in the recorded gaze data; 2) we then add per-frame labels for driving task and context; 3) we benchmark a number of baseline and SOTA models for saliency and driver gaze prediction and use new annotations to analyze how their performance changes in scenarios involving different tasks; and, lastly, 4) we develop a novel model that modulates drivers' gaze prediction with explicit action and context information. While reducing noise in the DR(eye)VE gaze data improves results of all models, we show that using task information in our proposed model boosts performance even further compared to bottom-up models on the cleaned up data, both overall (by 24% KLD and 89% NSS) and on scenarios that involve performing safety-critical maneuvers and crossing intersections (by up to 10--30% KLD). Extended annotations and code are available at https://github.com/ykotseruba/SCOUT.

Read more

4/16/2024

SCOUT+: Towards Practical Task-Driven Drivers' Gaze Prediction
Total Score

0

SCOUT+: Towards Practical Task-Driven Drivers' Gaze Prediction

Iuliia Kotseruba, John K. Tsotsos

Accurate prediction of drivers' gaze is an important component of vision-based driver monitoring and assistive systems. Of particular interest are safety-critical episodes, such as performing maneuvers or crossing intersections. In such scenarios, drivers' gaze distribution changes significantly and becomes difficult to predict, especially if the task and context information is represented implicitly, as is common in many state-of-the-art models. However, explicit modeling of top-down factors affecting drivers' attention often requires additional information and annotations that may not be readily available. In this paper, we address the challenge of effective modeling of task and context with common sources of data for use in practical systems. To this end, we introduce SCOUT+, a task- and context-aware model for drivers' gaze prediction, which leverages route and map information inferred from commonly available GPS data. We evaluate our model on two datasets, DR(eye)VE and BDD-A, and demonstrate that using maps improves results compared to bottom-up models and reaches performance comparable to the top-down model SCOUT which relies on privileged ground truth information. Code is available at https://github.com/ykotseruba/SCOUT.

Read more

4/16/2024

Guiding Attention in End-to-End Driving Models
Total Score

0

Guiding Attention in End-to-End Driving Models

Diego Porres, Yi Xiao, Gabriel Villalonga, Alexandre Levy, Antonio M. L'opez

Vision-based end-to-end driving models trained by imitation learning can lead to affordable solutions for autonomous driving. However, training these well-performing models usually requires a huge amount of data, while still lacking explicit and intuitive activation maps to reveal the inner workings of these models while driving. In this paper, we study how to guide the attention of these models to improve their driving quality and obtain more intuitive activation maps by adding a loss term during training using salient semantic maps. In contrast to previous work, our method does not require these salient semantic maps to be available during testing time, as well as removing the need to modify the model's architecture to which it is applied. We perform tests using perfect and noisy salient semantic maps with encouraging results in both, the latter of which is inspired by possible errors encountered with real data. Using CIL++ as a representative state-of-the-art model and the CARLA simulator with its standard benchmarks, we conduct experiments that show the effectiveness of our method in training better autonomous driving models, especially when data and computational resources are scarce.

Read more

5/2/2024