Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)

Read original: arXiv:2406.11883 - Published 6/19/2024 by Martin Kuhn, Joscha Gruger, Christoph Matheja, Andrey Rivkin
Total Score

0

Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the intersection of Data Petri Nets and Probabilistic Programming, presenting an extended version of their previous work.
  • Data Petri Nets are a formalism for modeling and reasoning about systems with data, while Probabilistic Programming provides a powerful framework for specifying and reasoning about probabilistic models.
  • The authors aim to combine these two approaches to create a flexible and expressive tool for modeling and analyzing complex stochastic systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about combining two different approaches to modeling and analyzing complex systems: Data Petri Nets and Probabilistic Programming.

Data Petri Nets are a way to model systems that have data, like variables or information that changes over time. Probabilistic Programming is a tool for specifying and reasoning about models that involve uncertainty or randomness, like the outcomes of experiments or the behavior of complex systems.

The authors want to bring these two ideas together to create a more powerful and flexible way of modeling and analyzing systems that have both data and uncertainty. This could be useful for things like supply chain optimization, job shop scheduling, or even neural network design.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a formalism called "Data Petri Nets with Probabilistic Marking", which combines the expressiveness of Data Petri Nets with the ability to capture probabilistic behavior. The authors define the syntax and semantics of this new model, and show how it can be used to represent a range of stochastic systems.

They also present an inference algorithm for Data Petri Nets with Probabilistic Marking, which allows for the efficient computation of the probability distribution over the possible states of the system. This algorithm is based on a novel reduction to a Probabilistic Programming problem, which can then be solved using established techniques from that field.

The authors demonstrate the utility of their approach through a series of case studies, including a supply chain optimization problem and a job shop scheduling problem. They show how Data Petri Nets with Probabilistic Marking can capture the relevant details of these systems, and how the inference algorithm can be used to analyze their behavior and optimize their performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for combining the strengths of Data Petri Nets and Probabilistic Programming, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The authors focus on a specific type of probabilistic behavior, where the uncertainty is captured in the "marking" of the Petri Net. It's unclear how their approach would extend to more complex forms of probabilistic behavior, such as probabilistic transitions or continuous-time stochastic processes.
  • The inference algorithm relies on a reduction to a Probabilistic Programming problem, which could be computationally expensive for large or complex systems. Further work is needed to optimize the performance of the algorithm and explore alternative approaches.
  • The case studies presented in the paper, while illustrative, are relatively simple. It would be valuable to see how the authors' approach scales to more realistic and challenging applications, and to better understand the practical limitations and tradeoffs involved.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising direction for research, but there is still work to be done to fully realize the potential of combining Data Petri Nets and Probabilistic Programming.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel formalism called "Data Petri Nets with Probabilistic Marking" that combines the strengths of Data Petri Nets and Probabilistic Programming. By allowing for the representation of both data and probabilistic behavior, this approach offers a flexible and expressive tool for modeling and analyzing complex stochastic systems.

The authors demonstrate the utility of their approach through case studies in supply chain optimization and job shop scheduling, and present an inference algorithm for efficiently computing the probability distribution over the possible states of the system. While there are some limitations and areas for further research, this work represents an important step towards bridging the gap between formal methods and probabilistic reasoning, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)
Total Score

0

Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)

Martin Kuhn, Joscha Gruger, Christoph Matheja, Andrey Rivkin

Probabilistic programming (PP) is a programming paradigm that allows for writing statistical models like ordinary programs, performing simulations by running those programs, and analyzing and refining their statistical behavior using powerful inference engines. This paper takes a step towards leveraging PP for reasoning about data-aware processes. To this end, we present a systematic translation of Data Petri Nets (DPNs) into a model written in a PP language whose features are supported by most PP systems. We show that our translation is sound and provides statistical guarantees for simulating DPNs. Furthermore, we discuss how PP can be used for process mining tasks and report on a prototype implementation of our translation. We also discuss further analysis scenarios that could be easily approached based on the proposed translation and available PP tools.

Read more

6/19/2024

Using Petri Nets as an Integrated Constraint Mechanism for Reinforcement Learning Tasks
Total Score

0

Using Petri Nets as an Integrated Constraint Mechanism for Reinforcement Learning Tasks

Timon Sachweh, Pierre Haritz, Thomas Liebig

The lack of trust in algorithms is usually an issue when using Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents for control in real-world domains such as production plants, autonomous vehicles, or traffic-related infrastructure, partly due to the lack of verifiability of the model itself. In such scenarios, Petri nets (PNs) are often available for flowcharts or process steps, as they are versatile and standardized. In order to facilitate integration of RL models and as a step towards increasing AI trustworthiness, we propose an approach that uses PNs with three main advantages over typical RL approaches: Firstly, the agent can now easily be modeled with a combined state including both external environmental observations and agent-specific state information from a given PN. Secondly, we can enforce constraints for state-dependent actions through the inherent PN model. And lastly, we can increase trustworthiness by verifying PN properties through techniques such as model checking. We test our approach on a typical four-way intersection traffic light control setting and present our results, beating cycle-based baselines.

Read more

7/8/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Declarative Probabilistic Logic Programming in Discrete-Continuous Domains

Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De Raedt, Angelika Kimmig

Over the past three decades, the logic programming paradigm has been successfully expanded to support probabilistic modeling, inference and learning. The resulting paradigm of probabilistic logic programming (PLP) and its programming languages owes much of its success to a declarative semantics, the so-called distribution semantics. However, the distribution semantics is limited to discrete random variables only. While PLP has been extended in various ways for supporting hybrid, that is, mixed discrete and continuous random variables, we are still lacking a declarative semantics for hybrid PLP that not only generalizes the distribution semantics and the modeling language but also the standard inference algorithm that is based on knowledge compilation. We contribute the measure semantics together with the hybrid PLP language DC-ProbLog (where DC stands for distributional clauses) and its inference engine infinitesimal algebraic likelihood weighting (IALW). These have the original distribution semantics, standard PLP languages such as ProbLog, and standard inference engines for PLP based on knowledge compilation as special cases. Thus, we generalize the state of the art of PLP towards hybrid PLP in three different aspects: semantics, language and inference. Furthermore, IALW is the first inference algorithm for hybrid probabilistic programming based on knowledge compilation

Read more

9/10/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Probabilistic Programming with Programmable Variational Inference

McCoy R. Becker, Alexander K. Lew, Xiaoyan Wang, Matin Ghavami, Mathieu Huot, Martin C. Rinard, Vikash K. Mansinghka

Compared to the wide array of advanced Monte Carlo methods supported by modern probabilistic programming languages (PPLs), PPL support for variational inference (VI) is less developed: users are typically limited to a predefined selection of variational objectives and gradient estimators, which are implemented monolithically (and without formal correctness arguments) in PPL backends. In this paper, we propose a more modular approach to supporting variational inference in PPLs, based on compositional program transformation. In our approach, variational objectives are expressed as programs, that may employ first-class constructs for computing densities of and expected values under user-defined models and variational families. We then transform these programs systematically into unbiased gradient estimators for optimizing the objectives they define. Our design enables modular reasoning about many interacting concerns, including automatic differentiation, density accumulation, tracing, and the application of unbiased gradient estimation strategies. Additionally, relative to existing support for VI in PPLs, our design increases expressiveness along three axes: (1) it supports an open-ended set of user-defined variational objectives, rather than a fixed menu of options; (2) it supports a combinatorial space of gradient estimation strategies, many not automated by today's PPLs; and (3) it supports a broader class of models and variational families, because it supports constructs for approximate marginalization and normalization (previously introduced only for Monte Carlo inference). We implement our approach in an extension to the Gen probabilistic programming system (genjax.vi, implemented in JAX), and evaluate on several deep generative modeling tasks, showing minimal performance overhead vs. hand-coded implementations and performance competitive with well-established open-source PPLs.

Read more

6/26/2024