Data Trading Combination Auction Mechanism based on the Exponential Mechanism

Read original: arXiv:2405.07336 - Published 5/14/2024 by Kongyang Chen, Zeming Xu, Bing Mi
Total Score

0

📊

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the design of a data trading combination auction mechanism that protects the privacy of buyers' bidding information.
  • The proposed mechanism, called DCAE, applies the exponential mechanism to select the final settlement price and generate a probability distribution based on the price-revenue relationship.
  • Experiments show the DCAE method can ensure high auction revenue while preserving buyer privacy.

Plain English Explanation

In recent years, the growing use of machine learning has led to a significant increase in the demand for training data. This has given rise to the field of data trading, where buyers and sellers exchange data. Auctions are often used in these scenarios due to their fairness and authenticity.

Prior work has proposed combination auction mechanisms for different data trading domains. However, these mechanisms have not addressed the privacy concerns of buyers. The DCAE mechanism designed in this paper aims to protect buyers' bidding privacy while maintaining high auction revenue.

The key idea is to use the exponential mechanism to select the final settlement price for the auction. This generates a probability distribution based on the relationship between the price and the revenue, ensuring the buyers' bidding information is not revealed. The experiments show this approach can meet the dual goals of high revenue and buyer privacy protection.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the Data Trading Combination Auction Mechanism based on the Exponential Mechanism (DCAE) to address the privacy concerns of buyers in data trading auctions.

The DCAE mechanism works as follows:

  1. It applies the exponential mechanism to select the final settlement price for the auction.
  2. The mechanism then generates a probability distribution based on the relationship between the selected price and the resulting auction revenue.
  3. This probability distribution ensures the buyers' bidding information is not revealed, protecting their privacy.

The authors evaluate the DCAE mechanism under two different scenarios, comparing it to other auction mechanisms. The experimental results demonstrate that DCAE can achieve high auction revenue while effectively preserving the privacy of buyers' bids.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the privacy concerns of buyers in data trading auctions, an important issue that prior work had not sufficiently tackled. The use of the exponential mechanism is a clever approach to protecting bidding information while maintaining auction performance.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the DCAE mechanism. For example, it would be helpful to understand how the mechanism might scale to auctions with a large number of buyers, or how it would perform under different data distribution assumptions.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more thorough discussion of the privacy guarantees provided by the exponential mechanism, including any potential trade-offs or risks. Comparing the DCAE method to other privacy-preserving auction designs could also provide useful context.

Conclusion

This paper presents the DCAE mechanism, a novel data trading combination auction design that protects the privacy of buyers' bidding information. By applying the exponential mechanism, the method ensures high auction revenue while preventing the disclosure of sensitive bidding data.

The experimental results demonstrate the viability of the DCAE approach, which could have important implications for the development of fair and secure data trading markets. Further research is needed to explore the scalability, robustness, and broader applicability of this privacy-preserving auction mechanism.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

Total Score

0

Data Trading Combination Auction Mechanism based on the Exponential Mechanism

Kongyang Chen, Zeming Xu, Bing Mi

With the widespread application of machine learning technology in recent years, the demand for training data has increased significantly, leading to the emergence of research areas such as data trading. The work in this field is still in the developmental stage. Different buyers have varying degrees of demand for various types of data, and auctions play a role in such scenarios due to their authenticity and fairness. Recent related work has proposed combination auction mechanisms for different domains. However, such mechanisms have not addressed the privacy concerns of buyers. In this paper, we design a textit{Data Trading Combination Auction Mechanism based on the exponential mechanism} (DCAE) to protect buyers' bidding privacy from being leaked. We apply the exponential mechanism to select the final settlement price for the auction and generate a probability distribution based on the relationship between the price and the revenue. In the experimental aspect, we consider the selection of different mechanisms under two scenarios, and the experimental results show that this method can ensure high auction revenue and protect buyers' privacy from being violated.

Read more

5/14/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions

Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke

Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5 billion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is combinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned off simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional efficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike other combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no numeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be easily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most commonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous auctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines batch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit individual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if they are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple simultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a trade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the minimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets returned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the equilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what they receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a benchmark for fairness.

Read more

8/23/2024

Strategy-Proof Auctions through Conformal Prediction
Total Score

0

Strategy-Proof Auctions through Conformal Prediction

Roy Maor Lotan, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Yaniv Romano

Auctions are key for maximizing sellers' revenue and ensuring truthful bidding among buyers. Recently, an approach known as differentiable economics based on deep learning shows promise in learning optimal auction mechanisms for multiple items and participants. However, this approach has no guarantee of strategy-proofness at test time. Strategy-proofness is crucial as it ensures that buyers are incentivized to bid their true valuations, leading to optimal and fair auction outcomes without the risk of manipulation. Building on conformal prediction, we introduce a novel approach to achieve strategy-proofness with rigorous statistical guarantees. The key novelties of our method are: (i) the formulation of a regret prediction model, used to quantify at test time violations of strategy-proofness; and (ii) an auction acceptance rule that leverages the predicted regret to ensure that for a new auction, the data-driven mechanism meets the strategy-proofness requirement with high probability (e.g., 99%). Numerical experiments demonstrate the necessity for rigorous guarantees, the validity of our theoretical results, and the applicability of our proposed method.

Read more

7/9/2024

Deep Automated Mechanism Design for Integrating Ad Auction and Allocation in Feed
Total Score

0

Deep Automated Mechanism Design for Integrating Ad Auction and Allocation in Feed

Xuejian Li, Ze Wang, Bingqi Zhu, Fei He, Yongkang Wang, Xingxing Wang

E-commerce platforms usually present an ordered list, mixed with several organic items and an advertisement, in response to each user's page view request. This list, the outcome of ad auction and allocation processes, directly impacts the platform's ad revenue and gross merchandise volume (GMV). Specifically, the ad auction determines which ad is displayed and the corresponding payment, while the ad allocation decides the display positions of the advertisement and organic items. The prevalent methods of segregating the ad auction and allocation into two distinct stages face two problems: 1) Ad auction does not consider externalities, such as the influence of actual display position and context on ad Click-Through Rate (CTR); 2) The ad allocation, which utilizes the auction-winning ad's payment to determine the display position dynamically, fails to maintain incentive compatibility (IC) for the advertisement. For instance, in the auction stage employing the traditional Generalized Second Price (GSP) , even if the winning ad increases its bid, its payment remains unchanged. This implies that the advertisement cannot secure a better position and thus loses the opportunity to achieve higher utility in the subsequent ad allocation stage. Previous research often focused on one of the two stages, neglecting the two-stage problem, which may result in suboptimal outcomes...

Read more

4/12/2024