Decision-Focused Forecasting: Decision Losses for Multistage Optimisation

Read original: arXiv:2405.14719 - Published 5/24/2024 by Egon Perv{s}ak, Miguel F. Anjos
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes a "decision-focused forecasting" approach that accounts for the impact of forecasts on downstream decisions in a multi-stage optimization problem
  • Presents a recursive, fully differentiable model that can be trained end-to-end to optimize decision quality
  • Demonstrates improved performance over existing approaches on an energy storage arbitrage task

Plain English Explanation

Many real-world decisions are made in stages, where new information becomes available over time, and each decision has an impact on future choices. Decision-focused learning is a promising approach for these types of multi-stage decision problems under uncertainty.

The key idea is to train the forecasting model not just to make accurate predictions, but to make predictions that lead to good final decisions. This is done by incorporating the decision-making process into the training loop, so the model learns to make forecasts that work well for the downstream decisions.

This paper proposes a specific implementation of this decision-focused approach, called "decision-focused forecasting." It uses a recursive, differentiable model that can be trained end-to-end to optimize decision quality, rather than just prediction accuracy. The authors demonstrate that this approach outperforms existing methods on an energy storage arbitrage task, a real-world multi-stage decision problem.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a "decision-focused forecasting" approach, which extends the decision-focused learning concept to multi-stage optimization problems. In these problems, decisions must be made sequentially as new information (e.g., prices, demand) is revealed over time, and each decision impacts future decisions.

The key innovation is a recursive, fully differentiable model that can be trained end-to-end to optimize the quality of the final decisions, rather than just the accuracy of the forecasts. This is achieved by incorporating the multi-stage optimization process into the training loop, allowing the model to learn how to make forecasts that lead to better decisions.

The authors provide an analysis of the gradients produced by this model, showing how it adjusts the forecasts to account for the impact on the state-path of the multi-stage optimization problem. They then demonstrate an application of the model to an energy storage arbitrage task, where it outperforms existing application-driven learning, value-oriented, and other approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to decision-making under uncertainty, particularly for multi-stage optimization problems. By explicitly incorporating the decision-making process into the training of the forecasting model, the approach aims to produce forecasts that are optimized for the downstream decisions, rather than just for prediction accuracy.

One potential limitation is the computational complexity of the recursive, fully differentiable model, which may limit its scalability to larger problem instances. Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific energy storage arbitrage task and does not explore the generalizability of the approach to a wider range of multi-stage decision problems.

Further research could investigate the performance of the decision-focused forecasting approach on a broader set of real-world applications, as well as explore ways to improve the computational efficiency of the model. Additionally, data scaling effects and the role of digital twins in decision-focused learning could be interesting areas for further study.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel "decision-focused forecasting" approach that directly optimizes the forecasting model for the quality of the downstream decisions in a multi-stage optimization problem. By incorporating the decision-making process into the training loop, the model can learn to make forecasts that lead to better final decisions, rather than just accurate predictions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on an energy storage arbitrage task, where it outperforms existing methods. While the computational complexity of the model may be a limitation, the decision-focused approach represents a promising direction for improving decision-making under uncertainty in real-world, multi-stage problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Decision-Focused Forecasting: Decision Losses for Multistage Optimisation

Egon Perv{s}ak, Miguel F. Anjos

Decision-focused learning has emerged as a promising approach for decision making under uncertainty by training the upstream predictive aspect of the pipeline with respect to the quality of the downstream decisions. Most existing work has focused on single stage problems. Many real-world decision problems are more appropriately modelled using multistage optimisation as contextual information such as prices or demand is revealed over time and decisions now have a bearing on future decisions. We propose decision-focused forecasting, a multiple-implicitlayer model which in its training accounts for the intertemporal decision effects of forecasts using differentiable optimisation. The recursive model reflects a fully differentiable multistage optimisation approach. We present an analysis of the gradients produced by this model showing the adjustments made to account for the state-path caused by forecasting. We demonstrate an application of the model to an energy storage arbitrage task and report that our model outperforms existing approaches.

Read more

5/24/2024

Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
Total Score

0

Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline

Peng Li, Lixia Wu, Chaoqun Feng, Haoyuan Hu, Lei Fu, Jieping Ye

Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent properties of multi-objective optimization problems, we propose a set of novel loss functions. These loss functions are designed to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems, considering solution space, objective space, and decision quality, named landscape loss, Pareto set loss, and decision loss, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms traditional two-stage methods and most current decision-focused methods.

Read more

6/4/2024

Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning
Total Score

0

Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning

Noah Schutte, Krzysztof Postek, Neil Yorke-Smith

Optimization models used to make discrete decisions often contain uncertain parameters that are context-dependent and estimated through prediction. To account for the quality of the decision made based on the prediction, decision-focused learning (end-to-end predict-then-optimize) aims at training the predictive model to minimize regret, i.e., the loss incurred by making a suboptimal decision. Despite the challenge of the gradient of this loss w.r.t. the predictive model parameters being zero almost everywhere for optimization problems with a linear objective, effective gradient-based learning approaches have been proposed to minimize the expected loss, using the empirical loss as a surrogate. However, empirical regret can be an ineffective surrogate because empirical optimal decisions can vary substantially from expected optimal decisions. To understand the impact of this deficiency, we evaluate the effect of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty on the accuracy of empirical regret as a surrogate. Next, we propose three novel loss functions that approximate expected regret more robustly. Experimental results show that training two state-of-the-art decision-focused learning approaches using robust regret losses improves test-sample empirical regret in general while keeping computational time equivalent relative to the number of training epochs.

Read more

7/30/2024

Decision Focused Causal Learning for Direct Counterfactual Marketing Optimization
Total Score

0

Decision Focused Causal Learning for Direct Counterfactual Marketing Optimization

Hao Zhou, Rongxiao Huang, Shaoming Li, Guibin Jiang, Jiaqi Zheng, Bing Cheng, Wei Lin

Marketing optimization plays an important role to enhance user engagement in online Internet platforms. Existing studies usually formulate this problem as a budget allocation problem and solve it by utilizing two fully decoupled stages, i.e., machine learning (ML) and operation research (OR). However, the learning objective in ML does not take account of the downstream optimization task in OR, which causes that the prediction accuracy in ML may be not positively related to the decision quality. Decision Focused Learning (DFL) integrates ML and OR into an end-to-end framework, which takes the objective of the downstream task as the decision loss function and guarantees the consistency of the optimization direction between ML and OR. However, deploying DFL in marketing is non-trivial due to multiple technological challenges. Firstly, the budget allocation problem in marketing is a 0-1 integer stochastic programming problem and the budget is uncertain and fluctuates a lot in real-world settings, which is beyond the general problem background in DFL. Secondly, the counterfactual in marketing causes that the decision loss cannot be directly computed and the optimal solution can never be obtained, both of which disable the common gradient-estimation approaches in DFL. Thirdly, the OR solver is called frequently to compute the decision loss during model training in DFL, which produces huge computational cost and cannot support large-scale training data. In this paper, we propose a decision focused causal learning framework (DFCL) for direct counterfactual marketing optimization, which overcomes the above technological challenges. Both offline experiments and online A/B testing demonstrate the effectiveness of DFCL over the state-of-the-art methods. Currently, DFCL has been deployed in several marketing scenarios in Meituan, one of the largest online food delivery platform in the world.

Read more

7/19/2024