A Declarative System for Optimizing AI Workloads
2405.14696
2
0
🤖
Abstract
A long-standing goal of data management systems has been to build systems which can compute quantitative insights over large corpora of unstructured data in a cost-effective manner. Until recently, it was difficult and expensive to extract facts from company documents, data from scientific papers, or metrics from image and video corpora. Today's models can accomplish these tasks with high accuracy. However, a programmer who wants to answer a substantive AI-powered query must orchestrate large numbers of models, prompts, and data operations. For even a single query, the programmer has to make a vast number of decisions such as the choice of model, the right inference method, the most cost-effective inference hardware, the ideal prompt design, and so on. The optimal set of decisions can change as the query changes and as the rapidly-evolving technical landscape shifts. In this paper we present Palimpzest, a system that enables anyone to process AI-powered analytical queries simply by defining them in a declarative language. The system uses its cost optimization framework to implement the query plan with the best trade-offs between runtime, financial cost, and output data quality. We describe the workload of AI-powered analytics tasks, the optimization methods that Palimpzest uses, and the prototype system itself. We evaluate Palimpzest on tasks in Legal Discovery, Real Estate Search, and Medical Schema Matching. We show that even our simple prototype offers a range of appealing plans, including one that is 3.3x faster and 2.9x cheaper than the baseline method, while also offering better data quality. With parallelism enabled, Palimpzest can produce plans with up to a 90.3x speedup at 9.1x lower cost relative to a single-threaded GPT-4 baseline, while obtaining an F1-score within 83.5% of the baseline. These require no additional work by the user.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Modern AI models can now process analytical queries about various types of data, such as company documents, scientific papers, and multimedia content, with high accuracy.
- However, implementing these AI-powered analytics tasks requires a programmer to make numerous complex decisions, such as choosing the right model, inference method, hardware, and prompt design.
- The optimal set of decisions can change as the query and technical landscape evolve, making it challenging for individual programmers to manage.
Plain English Explanation
In the past, it was difficult and expensive to extract useful information from things like company documents, research papers, or multimedia data. [object Object] But now, modern AI models have the ability to analyze this type of data and answer complex questions about it with high accuracy.
The problem is that for a programmer to use these AI models to answer a specific question, they have to make a lot of decisions. They need to choose the right AI model, the best way to use it (called the "inference method"), the most cost-effective hardware to run it on, and the best way to phrase the question (the "prompt design"). And all of these decisions can change depending on the specific question being asked and as the technology keeps improving.
[object Object] To make this easier, the researchers created a system called Palimpzest. Palimpzest allows anyone to define an analytical query in a simple language, and then it automatically figures out the best way to use AI models to answer that query. It explores different combinations of models, prompts, and other optimizations to find the one that gives the best results in terms of speed, cost, and data quality.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces Palimpzest, a system that enables users to process AI-powered analytical queries by defining them in a declarative language. Palimpzest uses a cost optimization framework to explore the search space of AI models, prompting techniques, and related foundation model optimizations in order to implement the query with the best trade-offs between runtime, financial cost, and output data quality.
The authors first describe the typical workload of AI-powered analytics tasks, which often requires orchestrating large numbers of models, prompts, and data operations to answer a single substantive query. They then detail the optimization methods used by Palimpzest, including techniques for [object Object] and [object Object].
The paper evaluates Palimpzest on tasks in Legal Discovery, Real Estate Search, and Medical Schema Matching. The results show that even a simple prototype of Palimpzest can offer a range of appealing plans, including ones that are significantly faster, cheaper, and offer better data quality than baseline methods. With parallelism enabled, Palimpzest can produce plans with up to a 90.3x speedup at 9.1x lower cost relative to a single-threaded GPT-4 baseline, while maintaining high data quality.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the Palimpzest prototype is still relatively simple and that further research is needed to address additional challenges, such as handling more complex queries, ensuring reliable performance, and integrating advanced AI safety techniques.
One potential concern is the reliance on continuously evolving AI models and infrastructure, which could make it difficult to maintain a stable and consistent system. The authors do not discuss how Palimpzest might adapt to rapidly changing technologies and models.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical or societal implications of making powerful AI-powered analytics widely accessible. There may be concerns about the misuse of such technology, particularly in sensitive domains like [object Object] legal discovery or medical data analysis.
Overall, the Palimpzest system represents an important step towards democratizing access to AI-powered analytics, but further research is needed to address the challenges and potential risks associated with such a capability.
Conclusion
The paper presents Palimpzest, a system that enables anyone to process AI-powered analytical queries by defining them in a declarative language. Palimpzest uses a cost optimization framework to automatically select the most appropriate AI models, prompts, and related optimizations to implement the query with the best trade-offs between speed, cost, and data quality.
The evaluation results demonstrate the potential of Palimpzest to significantly improve the accessibility and efficiency of AI-powered analytics, with the possibility of up to 90x speedups and 9x cost reductions compared to a baseline approach. This could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of industries and applications that rely on extracting insights from complex data sources.
However, the paper also highlights the need for further research to address challenges related to system stability, ethical considerations, and potential misuse of the technology. As AI capabilities continue to advance, systems like Palimpzest will play an increasingly important role in empowering users to harness the full potential of these powerful tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Blueprint Architecture of Compound AI Systems for Enterprise
Eser Kandogan, Sajjadur Rahman, Nikita Bhutani, Dan Zhang, Rafael Li Chen, Kushan Mitra, Sairam Gurajada, Pouya Pezeshkpour, Hayate Iso, Yanlin Feng, Hannah Kim, Chen Shen, Jin Wang, Estevam Hruschka
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities surpassing conventional NLP challenges, creating opportunities for use in production use cases. Towards this goal, there is a notable shift to building compound AI systems, wherein LLMs are integrated into an expansive software infrastructure with many components like models, retrievers, databases and tools. In this paper, we introduce a blueprint architecture for compound AI systems to operate in enterprise settings cost-effectively and feasibly. Our proposed architecture aims for seamless integration with existing compute and data infrastructure, with ``stream'' serving as the key orchestration concept to coordinate data and instructions among agents and other components. Task and data planners, respectively, break down, map, and optimize tasks and data to available agents and data sources defined in respective registries, given production constraints such as accuracy and latency.
6/4/2024
Towards Next-Generation Urban Decision Support Systems through AI-Powered Generation of Scientific Ontology using Large Language Models -- A Case in Optimizing Intermodal Freight Transportation
Jose Tupayachi, Haowen Xu, Olufemi A. Omitaomu, Mustafa Can Camur, Aliza Sharmin, Xueping Li
0
0
The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models into various optimization systems is on the rise. Yet, addressing complex urban and environmental management problems normally requires in-depth domain science and informatics expertise. This expertise is essential for deriving data and simulation-driven for informed decision support. In this context, we investigate the potential of leveraging the pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs). By adopting ChatGPT API as the reasoning core, we outline an integrated workflow that encompasses natural language processing, methontology-based prompt tuning, and transformers. This workflow automates the creation of scenario-based ontology using existing research articles and technical manuals of urban datasets and simulations. The outcomes of our methodology are knowledge graphs in widely adopted ontology languages (e.g., OWL, RDF, SPARQL). These facilitate the development of urban decision support systems by enhancing the data and metadata modeling, the integration of complex datasets, the coupling of multi-domain simulation models, and the formulation of decision-making metrics and workflow. The feasibility of our methodology is evaluated through a comparative analysis that juxtaposes our AI-generated ontology with the well-known Pizza Ontology employed in tutorials for popular ontology software (e.g., prot'eg'e). We close with a real-world case study of optimizing the complex urban system of multi-modal freight transportation by generating anthologies of various domain data and simulations to support informed decision-making.
5/30/2024
💬
Improving the Capabilities of Large Language Model Based Marketing Analytics Copilots With Semantic Search And Fine-Tuning
Yilin Gao, Sai Kumar Arava, Yancheng Li, James W. Snyder Jr
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely deployed to solve problems related to marketing attribution and budget optimization. However, AI models can be quite complex, and it can be difficult to understand model workings and insights without extensive implementation teams. In principle, recently developed large language models (LLMs), like GPT-4, can be deployed to provide marketing insights, reducing the time and effort required to make critical decisions. In practice, there are substantial challenges that need to be overcome to reliably use such models. We focus on domain-specific question-answering, SQL generation needed for data retrieval, and tabular analysis and show how a combination of semantic search, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning can be applied to dramatically improve the ability of LLMs to execute these tasks accurately. We compare both proprietary models, like GPT-4, and open-source models, like Llama-2-70b, as well as various embedding methods. These models are tested on sample use cases specific to marketing mix modeling and attribution.
4/23/2024
🔮
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits
Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon, Jacob Gardner, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, Amir Yazdanbakhsh
0
0
With the decline of Moore's law, optimizing program performance has become a major focus of software research. However, high-level optimizations such as API and algorithm changes remain elusive due to the difficulty of understanding the semantics of code. Simultaneously, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities at solving a wide range of programming tasks. To that end, we introduce a framework for adapting LLMs to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs, accompanied by extensive unit tests. A major challenge is the significant variability of measuring performance on commodity hardware, which can lead to spurious improvements. To isolate and reliably evaluate the impact of program optimizations, we design an environment based on the gem5 full system simulator, the de facto simulator used in academia and industry. Next, we propose a broad range of adaptation strategies for code optimization; for prompting, these include retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play. A combination of these techniques achieves a mean speedup of 6.86 with eight generations, higher than average optimizations from individual programmers (3.66). Using our model's fastest generations, we set a new upper limit on the fastest speedup possible for our dataset at 9.64 compared to using the fastest human submissions available (9.56).
4/29/2024