Decoding the Sociotechnical Dimensions of Digital Misinformation: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Overview

• This paper presents a systematic literature review on digital misinformation in computer science, covering research from 1993 to 2020.
• The review synthesizes primary research directions and sociotechnical challenges in mitigating the harmful effects of digital misinformation.
• The challenges are classified into Physical, Empirical, Syntactic, Semantic, Pragmatic, and Social dimensions, drawing from Organizational Semiotics.
• The study provides a novel categorization of mitigation strategies and a sociotechnical taxonomy for classifying types of false information.

Plain English Explanation

This paper takes a deep dive into the problem of digital misinformation, which refers to the spread of false or inaccurate information online. The researchers conducted a comprehensive review of nearly 800 studies on this topic, published between 1993 and 2020, to understand the key challenges and potential solutions.

The researchers organized the challenges into six main categories, inspired by a field called Organizational Semiotics. These categories cover different aspects of the misinformation problem, from the physical infrastructure that enables the spread of false information, to the semantic and pragmatic issues around how people interpret and make sense of it, to the broader social dynamics at play.

For example, some of the physical challenges might relate to the technical platforms and tools that make it easy to quickly share content online. Empirical challenges could involve difficulties in accurately measuring the scale and impact of misinformation. Semantic challenges might arise when false information exploits ambiguities in language or cultural differences in how information is interpreted.

By mapping out these diverse sociotechnical challenges, the researchers aim to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the misinformation problem and developing more effective strategies to address it. They also propose a new way of categorizing different types of false information and the mitigation approaches that might work best for each type.

Overall, this study offers a holistic perspective on the complex issue of digital misinformation, highlighting the need for multi-faceted solutions that account for the interplay between technology, human behavior, and societal dynamics. By synthesizing the latest research, it lays the groundwork for more targeted and impactful efforts to combat the spread of false information online.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a systematic literature review that explores the various initiatives and research efforts related to digital misinformation in computer science. The review covers 788 studies from SCOPUS, IEEE, and ACM digital libraries, published between 1993 and 2020.

The researchers adopted an exploratory approach to investigate the phenomenon of misinformation, synthesizing the primary research directions and sociotechnical challenges. These challenges were classified into six dimensions, drawing inspiration from the field of Organizational Semiotics:

1. Physical: Challenges related to the underlying technical infrastructure and platforms that enable the spread of misinformation.
2. Empirical: Challenges in accurately measuring the scale, impact, and dynamics of misinformation.
3. Syntactic: Challenges related to the structure and grammar of misinformation, such as the use of misleading language or formatting.
4. Semantic: Challenges arising from ambiguities or cultural differences in how information is interpreted and understood.
5. Pragmatic: Challenges related to the contextual factors and situational awareness required to identify and respond to misinformation effectively.
6. Social: Challenges stemming from the broader social dynamics, incentives, and power structures that influence the creation, dissemination, and reception of misinformation.

As key contributions, the study presents a novel categorization of mitigation strategies and a sociotechnical taxonomy for classifying different types of false information. The researchers also elaborate on the interrelationships between these sociotechnical aspects and their respective impacts on the overall misinformation landscape.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured review of the existing research on digital misinformation, covering a wide range of sociotechnical challenges and mitigation strategies. The adoption of the Organizational Semiotics framework to categorize these challenges is a novel and insightful approach, as it helps to highlight the multifaceted nature of the problem.

However, the review is primarily focused on synthesizing and categorizing the existing research, with relatively limited discussion of the limitations or shortcomings of the current approaches. While the researchers acknowledge the need for more holistic solutions, they do not delve deeply into the potential barriers or trade-offs involved in developing and implementing such strategies.

Additionally, the paper does not address the ethical considerations and potential unintended consequences that may arise from various misinformation mitigation efforts. For example, the impact of misinformation interventions on public policies or the potential for mitigation strategies to further marginalize certain groups are important aspects that could have been explored in more depth.

Furthermore, the review does not provide a critical analysis of the methodological approaches and research designs employed in the existing studies. Evaluating the rigor, validity, and generalizability of the underlying research could have strengthened the insights and implications drawn from the literature synthesis.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a valuable contribution by offering a techno-cognitive approach to detecting fallacies in climate misinformation and providing a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing the multifaceted challenge of digital misinformation.

Conclusion

This systematic literature review offers a holistic perspective on the complex issue of digital misinformation, highlighting the diverse sociotechnical challenges that must be addressed to effectively mitigate the harmful effects of false information online. By synthesizing the latest research across multiple dimensions, the study presents a novel categorization of mitigation strategies and a sociotechnical taxonomy for classifying different types of misinformation.

The findings of this review can serve as a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and technology companies alike, as they work to develop more targeted and impactful solutions to the misinformation crisis. By understanding the interplay between technology, human behavior, and societal dynamics, stakeholders can devise more comprehensive and nuanced approaches to combat the spread of false information and promote the integrity of digital information ecosystems.