What characteristics define disinformation and fake news?: review of taxonomies and definitions

Read original: arXiv:2405.18339 - Published 5/29/2024 by Ergon Cugler de Moraes Silva, Jose Carlos Vaz
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Disinformation and fake news are important phenomena with complex characteristics
  • This technical note provides a comprehensive analysis of 46 definitions to highlight 4 key points about their fundamental characteristics
  • The research adopts the Prisma 2020 method, analyzing 237 reviewed articles across 4 databases in Portuguese and English

Plain English Explanation

This research paper examines the characteristics that define disinformation and fake news. It takes a deep dive into 46 different definitions to identify 4 key points about the fundamental nature of these issues.

The researchers used a rigorous research method called Prisma 2020 to analyze 237 articles from 4 different databases in both Portuguese and English. This allowed them to take a comprehensive look at the topic and synthesize the existing knowledge.

At the core, disinformation is information that is partially or completely false, created intentionally to mislead people. It often contains opportunistic content designed to manipulate reality. The way individuals interpret this information and the broader context they're in can also play a big role in how disinformation spreads and takes hold.

The paper breaks down 4 critical elements of disinformation and fake news: the sender, the content, the receiver, and the environment it exists in. Understanding these different factors is key to addressing the challenge of disinformation.

Technical Explanation

The researchers adopted the Prisma 2020 method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of disinformation and fake news. They selected 5 search sets with the Boolean operator AND in both Portuguese and English, applying them across 4 databases. This resulted in 237 reviewed articles.

After a meticulous analysis, the researchers identified relevant articles and excluded duplicates and inaccessible documents. They synthesized 46 definitions to highlight 4 key points about the fundamental characteristics of disinformation and fake news:

  1. Sender: Disinformation is information that is totally or partially false, crafted by a sender with the aim of misleading.
  2. Content: The content is opportunistic, designed to manipulate reality.
  3. Receiver: The information is amplified by individual characteristics of the receiver in their interpretation.
  4. Environment: Contextual factors in which the receiver is embedded also play a role.

This comprehensive approach allowed the researchers to examine disinformation and fake news beyond just the content itself, taking into account the complex interplay of the sender, receiver, and the broader environment.

Critical Analysis

The technical note provides a well-rounded and nuanced analysis of the characteristics of disinformation and fake news. By synthesizing 46 definitions, the researchers were able to distill the key elements that define these phenomena.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific tactics and techniques used by creators of disinformation, nor does it explore the motivations and incentive structures that drive the production and spread of false information. Further research in these areas could provide additional insights.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the general characteristics of disinformation, but does not address the particular challenges of identifying and combating it in the context of emerging technologies like large language models. Exploring these cutting-edge issues could be a fruitful area for future study.

Overall, this technical note provides a solid foundation for understanding the complex nature of disinformation and fake news. By highlighting the importance of the sender, content, receiver, and environment, it offers a useful framework for further investigating and addressing these critical problems.

Conclusion

This technical note offers a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental characteristics of disinformation and fake news. By synthesizing 46 definitions, the researchers identified four key elements: the sender, the content, the receiver, and the broader environment.

This multi-faceted approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of these phenomena, going beyond just the content itself. It underscores the importance of considering the complex interplay of various factors in the production, dissemination, and interpretation of false information.

The insights provided in this paper can inform efforts to detect, mitigate, and combat disinformation and fake news, which have significant societal implications. As technology continues to evolve, further research will be needed to address emerging challenges, but this technical note lays important groundwork for understanding the core characteristics of these critical issues.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

What characteristics define disinformation and fake news?: review of taxonomies and definitions

Ergon Cugler de Moraes Silva, Jose Carlos Vaz

What characteristics define disinformation and fake news? To address this research question, this Technical Note provides a comprehensive analysis of disinformation and fake news, synthesizing 46 definitions and highlighting four key points addressing their fundamental characteristics. Adopting the Prisma 2020 method, five search sets with the Boolean operator AND were selected in both Portuguese and English, which were applied across four databases, resulting in 237 reviewed articles. Following a meticulous analysis, relevant articles were identified and included, while duplicates and inaccessible documents were excluded. It points to disinformation as information that is totally or partially false, crafted by a sender with the aim of misleading, with opportunistic content designed to manipulate reality, being amplified by individual characteristics of the receiver in their interpretation and by contextual factors in which they are embedded. This Technical Note seeks to contribute to an understanding of the phenomenon of disinformation that includes the contextual dimension, obtaining as fundamental elements of analysis: I.) Sender; II.) Content; III.) Receiver; and IV.) Environment.

Read more

5/29/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

How disinformation and fake news impact public policies?: A review of international literature

Ergon Cugler de Moraes Silva, Jose Carlos Vaz

This study investigates the impact of disinformation on public policies. Using 28 sets of keywords in eight databases, a systematic review was carried out following the Prisma 2020 model (Page et al., 2021). After applying filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria to 4,128 articles and materials found, 46 publications were analyzed, resulting in 23 disinformation impact categories. These categories were organized into two main axes: State and Society and Actors and Dynamics, covering impacts on State actors, society actors, State dynamics and society dynamics. The results indicate that disinformation affects public decisions, adherence to policies, prestige of institutions, perception of reality, consumption, public health and other aspects. Furthermore, this study suggests that disinformation should be treated as a public problem and incorporated into the public policy research agenda, contributing to the development of strategies to mitigate its effects on government actions.

Read more

6/4/2024

Finding Fake News Websites in the Wild
Total Score

0

Finding Fake News Websites in the Wild

Leandro Araujo, Joao M. M. Couto, Luiz Felipe Nery, Isadora C. Rodrigues, Jussara M. Almeida, Julio C. S. Reis, Fabricio Benevenuto

The battle against the spread of misinformation on the Internet is a daunting task faced by modern society. Fake news content is primarily distributed through digital platforms, with websites dedicated to producing and disseminating such content playing a pivotal role in this complex ecosystem. Therefore, these websites are of great interest to misinformation researchers. However, obtaining a comprehensive list of websites labeled as producers and/or spreaders of misinformation can be challenging, particularly in developing countries. In this study, we propose a novel methodology for identifying websites responsible for creating and disseminating misinformation content, which are closely linked to users who share confirmed instances of fake news on social media. We validate our approach on Twitter by examining various execution modes and contexts. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in identifying misinformation websites, which can aid in gaining a better understanding of this phenomenon and enabling competent entities to tackle the problem in various areas of society.

Read more

7/16/2024

Misinformation is not about Bad Facts: An Analysis of the Production and Consumption of Fringe Content
Total Score

0

Misinformation is not about Bad Facts: An Analysis of the Production and Consumption of Fringe Content

JooYoung Lee, Emily Booth, Hany Farid, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu

What if misinformation is not an information problem at all? To understand the role of news publishers in potentially unintentionally propagating misinformation, we examine how far-right and fringe online groups share and leverage established legacy news media articles to advance their narratives. Our findings suggest that online fringe ideologies spread through the use of content that is consensus-based and factually correct. We found that Australian news publishers with both moderate and far-right political leanings contain comparable levels of information completeness and quality; and furthermore, that far-right Twitter users often share from moderate sources. However, a stark difference emerges when we consider two additional factors: 1) the narrow topic selection of articles by far-right users, suggesting that they cherry pick only news articles that engage with their preexisting worldviews and specific topics of concern, and 2) the difference between moderate and far-right publishers when we examine the writing style of their articles. Furthermore, we can identify users prone to sharing misinformation based on their communication style. These findings have important implications for countering online misinformation, as they highlight the powerful role that personal biases towards specific topics and publishers' writing styles have in amplifying fringe ideologies online.

Read more

5/28/2024