How disinformation and fake news impact public policies?: A review of international literature

Overview

• This study investigates the impact of disinformation on public policies.
• The researchers conducted a systematic review of 4,128 articles and materials, ultimately analyzing 46 publications.
• They identified 23 categories of disinformation's impact, organized into two main axes: State and Society, and Actors and Dynamics.
• The results indicate that disinformation affects public decisions, adherence to policies, institutional prestige, perception of reality, consumption, public health, and other aspects.
• The study suggests that disinformation should be treated as a public problem and incorporated into the public policy research agenda, to develop strategies for mitigating its effects on government actions.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers looked at how the spread of false or misleading information, commonly known as disinformation, can impact public policies and decision-making. They reviewed thousands of articles and research materials, and identified 23 different ways in which disinformation can have an effect.

These impacts were grouped into two main categories: those that affect government and state actors, and those that affect society and the general public. For example, disinformation can lead to poor public decisions, undermine trust in institutions, and even influence people's understanding of reality. It can also impact things like consumer behavior and public health.

The researchers believe that disinformation should be treated as a serious public issue, and that more research is needed to develop effective strategies for addressing its negative effects on government policies and actions. By better understanding the impacts of disinformation, policymakers can work to mitigate its influence and ensure that public decisions are based on accurate information.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature on the impact of disinformation on public policies, following the Prisma 2020 model. They used 28 sets of keywords to search eight different databases, ultimately identifying 4,128 articles and materials for review.

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the researchers analyzed 46 publications, which led to the identification of 23 categories of disinformation's impact. These categories were organized into two main axes: "State and Society" and "Actors and Dynamics." The "State and Society" axis covers the impacts on state actors and societal actors, while the "Actors and Dynamics" axis addresses the impacts on state dynamics and societal dynamics.

The results indicate that disinformation can affect a wide range of aspects, including public decisions, adherence to policies, the prestige of institutions, perceptions of reality, consumption patterns, public health, and more. The study suggests that disinformation is not just about bad facts, but rather a complex phenomenon that can have far-reaching consequences for governments and the public.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study, including the inherent challenges in systematically reviewing a rapidly evolving field and the potential for selection bias in the publications they analyzed. They also note that the majority of the reviewed studies were conducted in developed countries, and that more research is needed to understand the impacts of disinformation in different cultural and political contexts.

Additionally, the study focuses primarily on the negative impacts of disinformation, but does not explore potential positive or neutral effects that may arise from the local perceptions and practices of news sharing and fact-checking. It also does not delve into the specific mechanisms or user-centered interventions that may be effective in mitigating the effects of disinformation.

Further research could build on this study by employing more advanced modeling techniques, such as agent-based frameworks, to better understand the complex dynamics and feedback loops involved in the spread and impact of disinformation.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the various ways in which disinformation can impact public policies and decision-making. By identifying the diverse range of effects, from influencing public perceptions to undermining institutional legitimacy, the researchers highlight the critical need for policymakers and researchers to address disinformation as a significant public problem.

The findings of this study suggest that developing effective strategies to mitigate the impacts of disinformation should be a priority in the public policy research agenda. By understanding the complex dynamics underlying the spread and influence of false information, stakeholders can work to ensure that public decisions are based on accurate, reliable information and that the integrity of government institutions is preserved.