Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problems

Read original: arXiv:2401.01192 - Published 7/30/2024 by Moritz Vinzent Seiler, Pascal Kerschke, Heike Trautmann
Total Score

0

Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Deep-ELA, a novel approach for analyzing the landscape of single- and multi-objective continuous optimization problems using self-supervised pre-trained transformers.
  • Deep-ELA aims to extract meaningful insights about the structure and complexity of optimization landscapes, which can inform the design of more effective optimization algorithms.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Deep-ELA on a range of benchmark optimization problems, showing that it can outperform traditional landscape analysis methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called Deep-ELA that uses advanced machine learning models called transformers to explore and analyze the "landscape" of optimization problems.

An optimization problem is like trying to find the best solution to a complex challenge, such as the optimal design for a product or the most efficient way to schedule a set of tasks. The "landscape" of an optimization problem refers to the shape and structure of the different possible solutions, which can be visualized as a multidimensional surface.

By analyzing this landscape, researchers can gain valuable insights that can help them design better algorithms for solving optimization problems, especially those with multiple competing objectives ("multi-objective" problems).

The key innovation in this paper is the use of self-supervised pretrained transformers, which are a type of powerful machine learning model that can extract meaningful features and patterns from the optimization landscape without requiring extensive manual labeling or feature engineering.

The authors demonstrate that Deep-ELA can outperform traditional landscape analysis methods on a variety of benchmark optimization problems, making it a promising tool for researchers and practitioners working on challenging optimization challenges.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Deep-ELA, a novel approach for analyzing the landscape of single- and multi-objective continuous optimization problems using self-supervised pre-trained transformer models.

The key components of Deep-ELA are:

  1. Data Generation: The authors generate a dataset of points sampled from the optimization landscape, along with their corresponding objective function values.

  2. Transformer Pre-training: A transformer model is pre-trained in a self-supervised manner on the generated dataset, learning to predict the objective function values from the input points.

  3. Landscape Analysis: The pre-trained transformer is then used to extract various landscape features, such as ruggedness, modality, and multimodality, which can provide valuable insights about the structure and complexity of the optimization problem.

The authors evaluate Deep-ELA on a range of benchmark optimization problems, including single-objective functions like the Rosenbrock function and multi-objective problems like the ZDT test suite. They show that Deep-ELA can outperform traditional landscape analysis methods, such as fitness-distance correlation and information-theoretic measures, in terms of accurately characterizing the optimization landscape.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for exploring the landscape of optimization problems using advanced machine learning techniques. The use of self-supervised pre-trained transformers is a key strength, as it allows the model to learn meaningful features from the data without the need for extensive manual labeling or feature engineering.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization to Real-world Problems: The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Deep-ELA on a range of benchmark optimization problems, but it remains to be seen how well the approach would scale and perform on more complex, real-world optimization challenges.

  2. Computational Complexity: The training and application of the transformer model may be computationally intensive, which could limit the practicality of Deep-ELA for very large-scale optimization problems.

  3. Interpretability: While the paper presents various landscape features extracted by Deep-ELA, it would be valuable to further explore the interpretability of these features and how they can be used to guide the design of optimization algorithms.

  4. Robustness to Noise and Uncertainty: Many real-world optimization problems involve noisy or uncertain objective function evaluations, and it would be important to assess the performance of Deep-ELA in such scenarios.

Overall, the Deep-ELA approach presented in this paper is a significant contribution to the field of optimization landscape analysis, and it opens up new avenues for leveraging the power of deep learning techniques to gain deeper insights into the structure and complexity of optimization problems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique called Deep-ELA that uses self-supervised pre-trained transformer models to analyze the landscape of single- and multi-objective continuous optimization problems. By extracting various landscape features, Deep-ELA can provide valuable insights about the structure and complexity of optimization problems, which can inform the design of more effective optimization algorithms.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Deep-ELA on a range of benchmark optimization problems, showing that it can outperform traditional landscape analysis methods. While the approach shows promise, there are also some potential limitations and areas for further research, such as scaling to real-world problems, computational complexity, and robustness to noise and uncertainty.

Overall, the Deep-ELA technique presented in this paper represents an exciting advancement in the field of optimization landscape analysis, and it has the potential to significantly impact the development of more powerful and efficient optimization algorithms for a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problems
Total Score

0

Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problems

Moritz Vinzent Seiler, Pascal Kerschke, Heike Trautmann

In many recent works, the potential of Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) features to numerically characterize, in particular, single-objective continuous optimization problems has been demonstrated. These numerical features provide the input for all kinds of machine learning tasks on continuous optimization problems, ranging, i.a., from High-level Property Prediction to Automated Algorithm Selection and Automated Algorithm Configuration. Without ELA features, analyzing and understanding the characteristics of single-objective continuous optimization problems is -- to the best of our knowledge -- very limited. Yet, despite their usefulness, as demonstrated in several past works, ELA features suffer from several drawbacks. These include, in particular, (1.) a strong correlation between multiple features, as well as (2.) its very limited applicability to multi-objective continuous optimization problems. As a remedy, recent works proposed deep learning-based approaches as alternatives to ELA. In these works, e.g., point-cloud transformers were used to characterize an optimization problem's fitness landscape. However, these approaches require a large amount of labeled training data. Within this work, we propose a hybrid approach, Deep-ELA, which combines (the benefits of) deep learning and ELA features. Specifically, we pre-trained four transformers on millions of randomly generated optimization problems to learn deep representations of the landscapes of continuous single- and multi-objective optimization problems. Our proposed framework can either be used out-of-the-box for analyzing single- and multi-objective continuous optimization problems, or subsequently fine-tuned to various tasks focussing on algorithm behavior and problem understanding.

Read more

7/30/2024

Hybridizing Target- and SHAP-encoded Features for Algorithm Selection in Mixed-variable Black-box Optimization
Total Score

0

Hybridizing Target- and SHAP-encoded Features for Algorithm Selection in Mixed-variable Black-box Optimization

Konstantin Dietrich, Raphael Patrick Prager, Carola Doerr, Heike Trautmann

Exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) is a well-established tool to characterize optimization problems via numerical features. ELA is used for problem comprehension, algorithm design, and applications such as automated algorithm selection and configuration. Until recently, however, ELA was limited to search spaces with either continuous or discrete variables, neglecting problems with mixed variable types. This gap was addressed in a recent study that uses an approach based on target-encoding to compute exploratory landscape features for mixedvariable problems. In this work, we investigate an alternative encoding scheme based on SHAP values. While these features do not lead to better results in the algorithm selection setting considered in previous work, the two different encoding mechanisms exhibit complementary performance. Combining both feature sets into a hybrid approach outperforms each encoding mechanism individually. Finally, we experiment with two different ways of meta-selecting between the two feature sets. Both approaches are capable of taking advantage of the performance complementarity of the models trained on target-encoded and SHAP-encoded feature sets, respectively.

Read more

7/11/2024

Neural Exploratory Landscape Analysis
Total Score

0

Neural Exploratory Landscape Analysis

Zeyuan Ma, Jiacheng Chen, Hongshu Guo, Yue-Jiao Gong

Recent research in Meta-Black-Box Optimization (MetaBBO) have shown that meta-trained neural networks can effectively guide the design of black-box optimizers, significantly reducing the need for expert tuning and delivering robust performance across complex problem distributions. Despite their success, a paradox remains: MetaBBO still rely on human-crafted Exploratory Landscape Analysis features to inform the meta-level agent about the low-level optimization progress. To address the gap, this paper proposes Neural Exploratory Landscape Analysis (NeurELA), a novel framework that dynamically profiles landscape features through a two-stage, attention-based neural network, executed in an entirely end-to-end fashion. NeurELA is pre-trained over a variety of MetaBBO algorithms using a multi-task neuroevolution strategy. Extensive experiments show that NeurELA achieves consistently superior performance when integrated into different and even unseen MetaBBO tasks and can be efficiently fine-tuned for further performance boost. This advancement marks a pivotal step in making MetaBBO algorithms more autonomous and broadly applicable.

Read more

8/21/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Towards Exploratory Quality Diversity Landscape Analysis

Kyriacos Mosphilis, Vassilis Vassiliades

This work is a preliminary study on using Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) for Quality Diversity (QD) problems. We seek to understand whether ELA features can potentially be used to characterise QD problems paving the way for automating QD algorithm selection. Our results demonstrate that ELA features are affected by QD optimisation differently than random sampling, and more specifically, by the choice of variation operator, behaviour function, archive size and problem dimensionality.

Read more

5/24/2024