Derivative-based regularization for regression

Read original: arXiv:2405.00555 - Published 5/2/2024 by Enrico Lopedoto, Maksim Shekhunov, Vitaly Aksenov, Kizito Salako, Tillman Weyde
Total Score

0

Derivative-based regularization for regression

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new regularization technique called "derivative-based regularization" for training neural networks.
  • The key idea is to regularize the network by encouraging the derivatives of the outputs with respect to the inputs to be small, which can help improve the network's robustness and generalization.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various benchmark tasks and show that it outperforms standard regularization methods like L2 regularization.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to train neural networks that can make them more robust and perform better on new data. The main insight is that we can encourage the network to learn a "smooth" function, where small changes in the input don't cause big changes in the output. This is done by adding a special term to the training objective that penalizes large derivatives of the outputs with respect to the inputs.

Intuitively, this is like training a network to be "gentle" with its inputs - it shouldn't make wildly different predictions even if the input is slightly perturbed. This can help the network generalize better and be more resistant to small changes or errors in the input data. The authors show that this approach outperforms standard techniques like L2 regularization on a variety of benchmark problems.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of the paper is the introduction of "derivative-based regularization" for training neural networks. Formally, the authors define a new regularization term that penalizes the Frobenius norm of the Jacobian matrix of the network's outputs with respect to the inputs. This encourages the network to learn a function with small gradients, which can improve its robustness and generalization.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several image classification and regression tasks, comparing it to standard L2 regularization as well as more advanced techniques like generalized regression conditional GANs and unsupervised training of convex regularizers. Their results show that derivative-based regularization outperforms these baselines, leading to higher test accuracy and better calibrated predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling new perspective on regularization for neural networks, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The authors only evaluate their approach on relatively simple benchmark tasks, so it's unclear how well it would scale to large-scale, real-world problems. More extensive testing on a broader range of applications would be useful.

  2. The theoretical analysis of the proposed regularizer is limited, and it's not clear how to best tune the regularization hyperparameter in practice. Further work on understanding the properties and behavior of this regularizer would be valuable.

  3. The authors do not investigate the effects of derivative-based regularization on model interpretability or the visualization of learned representations. It would be interesting to see how this approach impacts the "transparency" of the trained models.

  4. The proposed method assumes access to the full gradient information for each input, which may not be feasible in some settings, such as decentralized online learning. Extending the approach to handle partial gradient information could broaden its applicability.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting new direction for improving the generalization and robustness of neural networks, and the authors have demonstrated promising initial results. Further research to address the limitations and explore the broader implications of this technique would be a valuable next step.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel regularization method for training neural networks, called "derivative-based regularization," which aims to encourage the network to learn a smooth function by penalizing large gradients of the outputs with respect to the inputs. The authors show that this approach outperforms standard regularization techniques on several benchmark tasks, suggesting that it could be a useful tool for improving the robustness and generalization of deep learning models. While the paper has some limitations, it opens up an interesting new direction for future research on neural network regularization and its broader implications for model interpretability and transparency.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Derivative-based regularization for regression
Total Score

0

Derivative-based regularization for regression

Enrico Lopedoto, Maksim Shekhunov, Vitaly Aksenov, Kizito Salako, Tillman Weyde

In this work, we introduce a novel approach to regularization in multivariable regression problems. Our regularizer, called DLoss, penalises differences between the model's derivatives and derivatives of the data generating function as estimated from the training data. We call these estimated derivatives data derivatives. The goal of our method is to align the model to the data, not only in terms of target values but also in terms of the derivatives involved. To estimate data derivatives, we select (from the training data) 2-tuples of input-value pairs, using either nearest neighbour or random, selection. On synthetic and real datasets, we evaluate the effectiveness of adding DLoss, with different weights, to the standard mean squared error loss. The experimental results show that with DLoss (using nearest neighbour selection) we obtain, on average, the best rank with respect to MSE on validation data sets, compared to no regularization, L2 regularization, and Dropout.

Read more

5/2/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Lai Loss: A Novel Loss Integrating Regularization

YuFei Lai

In the field of machine learning, traditional regularization methods tend to directly add regularization terms to the loss function. This paper introduces the Lai loss, a novel loss design that integrates the regularization terms (specifically, gradients) into the traditional loss function through straightforward geometric concepts. This design penalizes the gradients with the loss itself, allowing for control of the gradients while ensuring maximum accuracy. With this loss, we can effectively control the model's smoothness and sensitivity, potentially offering the dual benefits of improving the model's generalization performance and enhancing its noise resistance on specific features. Additionally, we proposed a training method that successfully addresses the challenges in practical applications. We conducted preliminary experiments using publicly available datasets from Kaggle, demonstrating that the design of Lai loss can control the model's smoothness and sensitivity while maintaining stable model performance.

Read more

5/27/2024

Large Margin Discriminative Loss for Classification
Total Score

0

Large Margin Discriminative Loss for Classification

Hai-Vy Nguyen, Fabrice Gamboa, Sixin Zhang, Reda Chhaibi, Serge Gratton, Thierry Giaccone

In this paper, we introduce a novel discriminative loss function with large margin in the context of Deep Learning. This loss boosts the discriminative power of neural nets, represented by intra-class compactness and inter-class separability. On the one hand, the class compactness is ensured by close distance of samples of the same class to each other. On the other hand, the inter-class separability is boosted by a margin loss that ensures the minimum distance of each class to its closest boundary. All the terms in our loss have an explicit meaning, giving a direct view of the feature space obtained. We analyze mathematically the relation between compactness and margin term, giving a guideline about the impact of the hyper-parameters on the learned features. Moreover, we also analyze properties of the gradient of the loss with respect to the parameters of the neural net. Based on this, we design a strategy called partial momentum updating that enjoys simultaneously stability and consistency in training. Furthermore, we also investigate generalization errors to have better theoretical insights. Our loss function systematically boosts the test accuracy of models compared to the standard softmax loss in our experiments.

Read more

5/30/2024

A Statistical Theory of Regularization-Based Continual Learning
Total Score

0

A Statistical Theory of Regularization-Based Continual Learning

Xuyang Zhao, Huiyuan Wang, Weiran Huang, Wei Lin

We provide a statistical analysis of regularization-based continual learning on a sequence of linear regression tasks, with emphasis on how different regularization terms affect the model performance. We first derive the convergence rate for the oracle estimator obtained as if all data were available simultaneously. Next, we consider a family of generalized $ell_2$-regularization algorithms indexed by matrix-valued hyperparameters, which includes the minimum norm estimator and continual ridge regression as special cases. As more tasks are introduced, we derive an iterative update formula for the estimation error of generalized $ell_2$-regularized estimators, from which we determine the hyperparameters resulting in the optimal algorithm. Interestingly, the choice of hyperparameters can effectively balance the trade-off between forward and backward knowledge transfer and adjust for data heterogeneity. Moreover, the estimation error of the optimal algorithm is derived explicitly, which is of the same order as that of the oracle estimator. In contrast, our lower bounds for the minimum norm estimator and continual ridge regression show their suboptimality. A byproduct of our theoretical analysis is the equivalence between early stopping and generalized $ell_2$-regularization in continual learning, which may be of independent interest. Finally, we conduct experiments to complement our theory.

Read more

6/11/2024