Design and evaluation of AI copilots -- case studies of retail copilot templates

Read original: arXiv:2407.09512 - Published 7/16/2024 by Michal Furmakiewicz, Chang Liu, Angus Taylor, Ilya Venger
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the design and evaluation of an AI copilot system, using a case study of developing copilot templates for the retail domain by Microsoft.
  • The first section covers the key technical components of a copilot's architecture, including the large language model (LLM), plugins for knowledge retrieval and actions, orchestration, system prompts, and responsible AI guardrails.
  • The second section discusses testing and evaluation as a way to promote desired outcomes and manage unintended consequences when using AI in a business context, through the lens of an end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework.

Plain English Explanation

Building an effective AI assistant, or "copilot," requires carefully designing its underlying system and thoroughly testing it. The paper uses Microsoft's development of copilot templates for the retail industry as an example to illustrate this process.

The first part of the paper focuses on the key technical components that make up a copilot's architecture. This includes the large language model (LLM) that powers the copilot's natural language understanding and generation, as well as plugins that allow it to retrieve relevant information and perform specific actions. The copilot also needs a way to orchestrate these different components, and the researchers discuss the importance of carefully crafting system prompts and implementing responsible AI safeguards.

The second part of the paper highlights the critical role of testing and evaluation in ensuring the copilot behaves as intended. The researchers propose using an "end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework" to measure and improve the copilot's quality and safety. This involves understanding how the copilot's outputs influence human decision-making and carefully monitoring for any unintended consequences.

By providing insights into both the design and evaluation of a copilot system, the paper emphasizes the importance of taking a systematic and thoughtful approach to building effective, human-centered AI assistants.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines a comprehensive framework for developing and evaluating an AI copilot system, drawing from a case study of Microsoft's work on copilot templates for the retail domain.

The first section delves into the key technical components of a copilot's architecture. At the core is a large language model (LLM) that powers the copilot's natural language understanding and generation capabilities. This LLM is enhanced with specialized "plugins" that allow the copilot to retrieve relevant information and perform specific actions, such as accessing databases or executing code.

An important aspect of the copilot's design is the orchestration system that coordinates the various components, ensuring smooth and coherent responses. The researchers also emphasize the critical role of carefully crafted "system prompts" that guide the LLM's behavior and the implementation of "responsible AI" guardrails to mitigate potential harms.

The second section of the paper focuses on the testing and evaluation of the copilot system. The researchers propose an "end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework" as a principled approach to understanding how the copilot's outputs influence human decision-making and to proactively manage any unintended consequences. This involves carefully monitoring the copilot's performance, gathering user feedback, and continuously iterating on the system to improve its quality and safety.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to developing and evaluating an AI copilot system, addressing both the technical design and the crucial aspect of testing and evaluation. The researchers' focus on responsible AI practices and the end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework is particularly commendable, as it acknowledges the importance of managing unintended consequences and promoting desired outcomes when deploying AI systems in real-world business contexts.

However, the paper does not delve into some potential limitations or challenges that may arise in the practical implementation of such a copilot system. For example, the researchers could have discussed the difficulties in scaling the system to handle diverse user needs, the challenges in maintaining the copilot's knowledge and capabilities over time, or the ethical considerations around the use of personalized user data to enhance the copilot's performance.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the scalability and generalizability of the proposed approach beyond the specific retail domain case study. It would be interesting to see how the framework could be adapted to other business verticals or even more general-purpose AI assistant applications.

Nevertheless, the paper provides a valuable blueprint for those interested in building effective and responsible AI copilot systems, emphasizing the importance of a systematic and human-centered approach to design and evaluation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for the design and evaluation of an AI copilot system, using a case study from Microsoft's work on copilot templates for the retail industry. The researchers highlight the key technical components of a copilot's architecture, including the large language model, specialized plugins, orchestration, system prompts, and responsible AI safeguards.

Importantly, the paper also emphasizes the critical role of testing and evaluation in ensuring the copilot system behaves as intended and promotes desired outcomes while managing unintended consequences. The proposed end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework offers a principled approach to measuring and improving the copilot's quality and safety.

By providing insights into both the design and evaluation of a copilot system, this paper offers concrete evidence of the importance of taking a systematic and thoughtful approach to building effective, human-centered AI assistants. The lessons learned from this research can serve as a valuable reference for organizations and researchers interested in developing advanced AI copilot systems for various business applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Design and evaluation of AI copilots -- case studies of retail copilot templates

Michal Furmakiewicz, Chang Liu, Angus Taylor, Ilya Venger

Building a successful AI copilot requires a systematic approach. This paper is divided into two sections, covering the design and evaluation of a copilot respectively. A case study of developing copilot templates for the retail domain by Microsoft is used to illustrate the role and importance of each aspect. The first section explores the key technical components of a copilot's architecture, including the LLM, plugins for knowledge retrieval and actions, orchestration, system prompts, and responsible AI guardrails. The second section discusses testing and evaluation as a principled way to promote desired outcomes and manage unintended consequences when using AI in a business context. We discuss how to measure and improve its quality and safety, through the lens of an end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework. By providing insights into the anatomy of a copilot and the critical aspects of testing and evaluation, this paper provides concrete evidence of how good design and evaluation practices are essential for building effective, human-centered AI assistants.

Read more

7/16/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Development and Evaluation Study of Intelligent Cockpit in the Age of Large Models

Jun Ma, Meng Wang, Jinhui Pang, Haofen Wang, Xuejing Feng, Zhipeng Hu, Zhenyu Yang, Mingyang Guo, Zhenming Liu, Junwei Wang, Siyi Lu, Zhiming Gou

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Large Models has a great impact on the application development of automotive Intelligent cockpit. The fusion development of Intelligent Cockpit and Large Models has become a new growth point of user experience in the industry, which also creates problems for related scholars, practitioners and users in terms of their understanding and evaluation of the user experience and the capability characteristics of the Intelligent Cockpit Large Models (ICLM). This paper aims to analyse the current situation of Intelligent cockpit, large model and AI Agent, to reveal the key of application research focuses on the integration of Intelligent Cockpit and Large Models, and to put forward a necessary limitation for the subsequent development of an evaluation system for the capability of automotive ICLM and user experience. The evaluation system, P-CAFE, proposed in this paper mainly proposes five dimensions of perception, cognition, action, feedback and evolution as the first-level indicators from the domains of cognitive architecture, user experience, and capability characteristics of large models, and many second-level indicators to satisfy the current status of the application and research focuses are selected. After expert evaluation, the weights of the indicators were determined, and the indicator system of P-CAFE was established. Finally, a complete evaluation method was constructed based on Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. It will lay a solid foundation for the application and evaluation of the automotive ICLM, and provide a reference for the development and improvement of the future ICLM.

Read more

9/25/2024

Evaluation and Continual Improvement for an Enterprise AI Assistant
Total Score

0

Evaluation and Continual Improvement for an Enterprise AI Assistant

Akash V. Maharaj, Kun Qian, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Sally Fang, Horia Galatanu, Manas Garg, Rachel Hanessian, Nishant Kapoor, Ken Russell, Shivakumar Vaithyanathan, Yunyao Li

The development of conversational AI assistants is an iterative process with multiple components. As such, the evaluation and continual improvement of these assistants is a complex and multifaceted problem. This paper introduces the challenges in evaluating and improving a generative AI assistant for enterprises, which is under active development, and how we address these challenges. We also share preliminary results and discuss lessons learned.

Read more

7/18/2024

📉

Total Score

1

Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming

Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Eric Horvitz

Code-recommendation systems, such as Copilot and CodeWhisperer, have the potential to improve programmer productivity by suggesting and auto-completing code. However, to fully realize their potential, we must understand how programmers interact with these systems and identify ways to improve that interaction. To seek insights about human-AI collaboration with code recommendations systems, we studied GitHub Copilot, a code-recommendation system used by millions of programmers daily. We developed CUPS, a taxonomy of common programmer activities when interacting with Copilot. Our study of 21 programmers, who completed coding tasks and retrospectively labeled their sessions with CUPS, showed that CUPS can help us understand how programmers interact with code-recommendation systems, revealing inefficiencies and time costs. Our insights reveal how programmers interact with Copilot and motivate new interface designs and metrics.

Read more

4/23/2024