Detecting and Evaluating Medical Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models
2406.10185
0
0
Abstract
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly integral to healthcare applications, including medical visual question answering and imaging report generation. While these models inherit the robust capabilities of foundational Large Language Models (LLMs), they also inherit susceptibility to hallucinations-a significant concern in high-stakes medical contexts where the margin for error is minimal. However, currently, there are no dedicated methods or benchmarks for hallucination detection and evaluation in the medical field. To bridge this gap, we introduce Med-HallMark, the first benchmark specifically designed for hallucination detection and evaluation within the medical multimodal domain. This benchmark provides multi-tasking hallucination support, multifaceted hallucination data, and hierarchical hallucination categorization. Furthermore, we propose the MediHall Score, a new medical evaluative metric designed to assess LVLMs' hallucinations through a hierarchical scoring system that considers the severity and type of hallucination, thereby enabling a granular assessment of potential clinical impacts. We also present MediHallDetector, a novel Medical LVLM engineered for precise hallucination detection, which employs multitask training for hallucination detection. Through extensive experimental evaluations, we establish baselines for popular LVLMs using our benchmark. The findings indicate that MediHall Score provides a more nuanced understanding of hallucination impacts compared to traditional metrics and demonstrate the enhanced performance of MediHallDetector. We hope this work can significantly improve the reliability of LVLMs in medical applications. All resources of this work will be released soon.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in large vision-language models (VLMs).
- Hallucinations refer to outputs that are plausible but factually incorrect or do not align with the input.
- The researchers propose methods to identify and assess medical hallucinations in VLMs, which have become increasingly powerful but can also produce unreliable outputs.
Plain English Explanation
Modern AI models, particularly large vision-language models (VLMs), have made remarkable advancements in generating human-like text and images. However, these models can sometimes produce outputs that appear convincing but are actually factually incorrect or do not align with the original input. This phenomenon is known as "hallucination."
In the context of medical applications, hallucinations can be particularly problematic, as they could lead to the delivery of inaccurate or even harmful information. The researchers in this paper set out to develop methods for detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in VLMs.
By studying the types of medical hallucinations that can occur and how to identify them, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI models when used in healthcare settings. This is an important step towards ensuring that VLMs can be safely and effectively deployed in medical applications, where accuracy and reliability are paramount.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in large vision-language models (VLMs). The researchers first conducted a survey of existing literature on hallucination in multimodal large language models to gain a deeper understanding of the issue.
They then developed a benchmark for evaluating medical hallucinations in visual question-answering tasks, which involves presenting VLMs with medical images and questions and analyzing their responses for factual accuracy. This allowed them to systematically assess the prevalence and nature of medical hallucinations in these models.
Additionally, the researchers proposed a general framework for evaluating the holistic coverage and faithfulness of large vision-language models, which can be applied to assess hallucinations and other potential issues.
The findings from this research provide valuable insights into the characteristics and prevalence of medical hallucinations in VLMs, as well as methods for detecting and mitigating these issues. This work is an important step towards ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of large vision-language models in medical applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed approach to detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in large vision-language models. The researchers have done an admirable job of surveying the existing literature, developing robust benchmarks, and proposing comprehensive evaluation frameworks.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on visual question-answering tasks, which may not fully capture the breadth of potential medical applications for VLMs. It would be valuable to explore the prevalence of hallucinations in other types of medical tasks, such as image-to-text generation or multimodal disease diagnosis.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying causes of medical hallucinations in VLMs. Further research into the model architectures, training data, and fine-tuning approaches that contribute to these issues could inform more targeted mitigation strategies.
Overall, this work represents a significant contribution to the field of large vision-language model reliability and trustworthiness. By shining a light on the problem of medical hallucinations, the researchers have laid the groundwork for ongoing efforts to enhance the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems in healthcare applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive approach to detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in large vision-language models (VLMs). The researchers have developed robust benchmarks and evaluation frameworks to systematically assess the prevalence and nature of these issues, which are critical for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of VLMs in medical applications.
The findings from this work provide valuable insights into the characteristics of medical hallucinations and offer a foundation for ongoing efforts to improve the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems. As VLMs continue to advance and be deployed in healthcare settings, the methods and insights presented in this paper will become increasingly important for maintaining the accuracy and integrity of medical information and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Unified Hallucination Detection for Multimodal Large Language Models
Xiang Chen, Chenxi Wang, Yida Xue, Ningyu Zhang, Xiaoyan Yang, Qiang Li, Yue Shen, Lei Liang, Jinjie Gu, Huajun Chen
0
0
Despite significant strides in multimodal tasks, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are plagued by the critical issue of hallucination. The reliable detection of such hallucinations in MLLMs has, therefore, become a vital aspect of model evaluation and the safeguarding of practical application deployment. Prior research in this domain has been constrained by a narrow focus on singular tasks, an inadequate range of hallucination categories addressed, and a lack of detailed granularity. In response to these challenges, our work expands the investigative horizons of hallucination detection. We present a novel meta-evaluation benchmark, MHaluBench, meticulously crafted to facilitate the evaluation of advancements in hallucination detection methods. Additionally, we unveil a novel unified multimodal hallucination detection framework, UNIHD, which leverages a suite of auxiliary tools to validate the occurrence of hallucinations robustly. We demonstrate the effectiveness of UNIHD through meticulous evaluation and comprehensive analysis. We also provide strategic insights on the application of specific tools for addressing various categories of hallucinations.
5/28/2024
💬
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Zechen Bai, Pichao Wang, Tianjun Xiao, Tong He, Zongbo Han, Zheng Zhang, Mike Zheng Shou
0
0
This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), also known as Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), which have demonstrated significant advancements and remarkable abilities in multimodal tasks. Despite these promising developments, MLLMs often generate outputs that are inconsistent with the visual content, a challenge known as hallucination, which poses substantial obstacles to their practical deployment and raises concerns regarding their reliability in real-world applications. This problem has attracted increasing attention, prompting efforts to detect and mitigate such inaccuracies. We review recent advances in identifying, evaluating, and mitigating these hallucinations, offering a detailed overview of the underlying causes, evaluation benchmarks, metrics, and strategies developed to address this issue. Additionally, we analyze the current challenges and limitations, formulating open questions that delineate potential pathways for future research. By drawing the granular classification and landscapes of hallucination causes, evaluation benchmarks, and mitigation methods, this survey aims to deepen the understanding of hallucinations in MLLMs and inspire further advancements in the field. Through our thorough and in-depth review, we contribute to the ongoing dialogue on enhancing the robustness and reliability of MLLMs, providing valuable insights and resources for researchers and practitioners alike. Resources are available at: https://github.com/showlab/Awesome-MLLM-Hallucination.
4/30/2024
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, Wei Peng
0
0
Recent development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, ``hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. In this comprehensive survey, we dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation. Our scrutiny starts with a clarification of the concept of hallucinations in LVLMs, presenting a variety of hallucination symptoms and highlighting the unique challenges inherent in LVLM hallucinations. Subsequently, we outline the benchmarks and methodologies tailored specifically for evaluating hallucinations unique to LVLMs. Additionally, we delve into an investigation of the root causes of these hallucinations, encompassing insights from the training data and model components. We also critically review existing methods for mitigating hallucinations. The open questions and future directions pertaining to hallucinations within LVLMs are discussed to conclude this survey.
5/7/2024
🔮
Hallucination Benchmark in Medical Visual Question Answering
Jinge Wu, Yunsoo Kim, Honghan Wu
0
0
The recent success of large language and vision models (LLVMs) on vision question answering (VQA), particularly their applications in medicine (Med-VQA), has shown a great potential of realizing effective visual assistants for healthcare. However, these models are not extensively tested on the hallucination phenomenon in clinical settings. Here, we created a hallucination benchmark of medical images paired with question-answer sets and conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the state-of-the-art models. The study provides an in-depth analysis of current models' limitations and reveals the effectiveness of various prompting strategies.
4/4/2024