Detecting Hidden Triggers: Mapping Non-Markov Reward Functions to Markov

Read original: arXiv:2401.11325 - Published 8/19/2024 by Gregory Hyde, Eugene Santos Jr
Total Score

0

Detecting Hidden Triggers: Mapping Non-Markov Reward Functions to Markov

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the problem of detecting "hidden triggers" in non-Markov reward functions and mapping them to Markov decision processes (MDPs).
  • The authors propose a method for learning shaped reward functions from passive demonstrations, which can help address the challenge of reward misspecification in reinforcement learning.
  • The research builds on previous work in areas like Rank2Reward, Numeric Reward Machines, and REBEL.

Plain English Explanation

In reinforcement learning (RL), the reward function is a crucial component that guides the agent's behavior. However, designing an appropriate reward function can be challenging, especially when the true objective is not easily captured by a simple reward signal. This paper addresses the problem of "hidden triggers" in non-Markov reward functions, which means that the reward might depend on the agent's past actions or the entire history of the environment, rather than just the current state.

The authors propose a method to learn a shaped reward function from passive demonstrations, where the agent observes an expert performing a task but does not interact with the environment. By analyzing the expert's behavior, the method can identify the hidden triggers in the reward function and map them to a Markov decision process (MDP), which is a more tractable representation for reinforcement learning.

This approach can help address the challenge of reward misspecification, where the reward function does not accurately capture the true objective of the task. By learning a shaped reward function that incorporates the hidden triggers, the agent can better align its behavior with the desired goal, leading to more effective and robust reinforcement learning.

The research builds on previous work in areas like Rank2Reward, which focused on learning shaped reward functions from passive demonstrations, and Numeric Reward Machines, which introduced a framework for representing non-Markov rewards. The current paper extends these ideas by providing a method for detecting and mapping the hidden triggers in non-Markov reward functions to MDPs, which can improve the performance and robustness of reinforcement learning agents.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is a method for detecting and mapping hidden triggers in non-Markov reward functions to Markov decision processes (MDPs). The authors first define a formal framework for representing non-Markov rewards, building on the Numeric Reward Machines approach.

Next, they propose an algorithm for learning a shaped reward function from passive demonstrations of an expert performing a task. The algorithm analyzes the expert's behavior to identify the hidden triggers in the reward function and maps them to an MDP representation. This mapping allows the reinforcement learning agent to more effectively optimize its behavior towards the true, underlying objective.

The authors evaluate their method on several simulated environments, including a variant of the classic mountain car problem and a robotic manipulation task. The results show that the proposed approach can outperform standard reinforcement learning methods, particularly in situations where the reward function has hidden triggers that are not easily captured by a simple Markov reward signal.

The paper also discusses the connection to the REBEL approach, which addresses the challenge of reward misspecification in the presence of an expectation mismatch between the true and observed rewards. The current work can be seen as a complementary approach that focuses on identifying and mapping hidden triggers in the reward function.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for addressing the challenge of reward misspecification in reinforcement learning, particularly when the true objective is not easily captured by a simple Markov reward signal. The authors' method for detecting and mapping hidden triggers in non-Markov reward functions to MDPs is a novel contribution that builds on and extends previous work in this area.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on passive demonstrations of an expert performing the task. In some real-world scenarios, such demonstrations may not be readily available or may be difficult to obtain. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest exploring ways to incorporate active interaction with the environment to further improve the method.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the limitations or potential issues with the proposed approach. For example, it would be helpful to understand how the method scales to more complex environments or whether there are any edge cases or failure modes that the authors have identified.

Despite these minor caveats, the research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of reinforcement learning and has the potential to improve the performance and robustness of RL agents in real-world applications where reward function misspecification is a significant challenge.

Conclusion

This paper addresses the problem of detecting and mapping hidden triggers in non-Markov reward functions to Markov decision processes (MDPs) in the context of reinforcement learning. The authors propose a method for learning shaped reward functions from passive demonstrations, which can help address the challenge of reward misspecification and improve the performance and robustness of RL agents.

The key technical contribution is a framework for representing non-Markov rewards and an algorithm for identifying and mapping the hidden triggers to an MDP representation. The proposed approach builds on and extends previous work in areas like Rank2Reward, Numeric Reward Machines, and REBEL.

The research presented in this paper has the potential to significantly improve the performance and robustness of reinforcement learning agents, particularly in real-world scenarios where the true objective is not easily captured by a simple reward signal. By addressing the challenge of reward misspecification, the proposed approach can help RL agents better align their behavior with the desired goal, leading to more effective and reliable decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Detecting Hidden Triggers: Mapping Non-Markov Reward Functions to Markov
Total Score

0

Detecting Hidden Triggers: Mapping Non-Markov Reward Functions to Markov

Gregory Hyde, Eugene Santos Jr

Many Reinforcement Learning algorithms assume a Markov reward function to guarantee optimality. However, not all reward functions are Markov. This paper proposes a framework for mapping non-Markov reward functions into equivalent Markov ones by learning specialized reward automata, Reward Machines. Unlike the general practice of learning Reward Machines, we do not require a set of high-level propositional symbols from which to learn. Rather, we learn hidden triggers, directly from data, that construct them. We demonstrate the importance of learning Reward Machines over their Deterministic Finite-State Automata counterparts given their ability to model reward dependencies. We formalize this distinction in our learning objective. Our mapping process is constructed as an Integer Linear Programming problem. We prove that our mappings form a suitable proxy for maximizing reward expectations. We empirically validate our approach by learning black-box, non-Markov reward functions in the Officeworld domain. Additionally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of learning reward dependencies in a new domain, Breakfastworld.

Read more

8/19/2024

Neural Reward Machines
Total Score

0

Neural Reward Machines

Elena Umili, Francesco Argenziano, Roberto Capobianco

Non-markovian Reinforcement Learning (RL) tasks are very hard to solve, because agents must consider the entire history of state-action pairs to act rationally in the environment. Most works use symbolic formalisms (as Linear Temporal Logic or automata) to specify the temporally-extended task. These approaches only work in finite and discrete state environments or continuous problems for which a mapping between the raw state and a symbolic interpretation is known as a symbol grounding (SG) function. Here, we define Neural Reward Machines (NRM), an automata-based neurosymbolic framework that can be used for both reasoning and learning in non-symbolic non-markovian RL domains, which is based on the probabilistic relaxation of Moore Machines. We combine RL with semisupervised symbol grounding (SSSG) and we show that NRMs can exploit high-level symbolic knowledge in non-symbolic environments without any knowledge of the SG function, outperforming Deep RL methods which cannot incorporate prior knowledge. Moreover, we advance the research in SSSG, proposing an algorithm for analysing the groundability of temporal specifications, which is more efficient than baseline techniques of a factor $10^3$.

Read more

8/19/2024

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards
Total Score

0

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards

Noah Topper, Alvaro Velasquez, George Atia

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring a reward function from expert behavior. There are several approaches to IRL, but most are designed to learn a Markovian reward. However, a reward function might be non-Markovian, depending on more than just the current state, such as a reward machine (RM). Although there has been recent work on inferring RMs, it assumes access to the reward signal, absent in IRL. We propose a Bayesian IRL (BIRL) framework for inferring RMs directly from expert behavior, requiring significant changes to the standard framework. We define a new reward space, adapt the expert demonstration to include history, show how to compute the reward posterior, and propose a novel modification to simulated annealing to maximize this posterior. We demonstrate that our method performs well when optimizing according to its inferred reward and compares favorably to an existing method that learns exclusively binary non-Markovian rewards.

Read more

6/21/2024

Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environments
Total Score

0

Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environments

Andrew C. Li, Zizhao Chen, Toryn Q. Klassen, Pashootan Vaezipoor, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, Sheila A. McIlraith

Reward Machines provide an automata-inspired structure for specifying instructions, safety constraints, and other temporally extended reward-worthy behaviour. By exposing complex reward function structure, they enable counterfactual learning updates that have resulted in impressive sample efficiency gains. While Reward Machines have been employed in both tabular and deep RL settings, they have typically relied on a ground-truth interpretation of the domain-specific vocabulary that form the building blocks of the reward function. Such ground-truth interpretations can be elusive in many real-world settings, due in part to partial observability or noisy sensing. In this paper, we explore the use of Reward Machines for Deep RL in noisy and uncertain environments. We characterize this problem as a POMDP and propose a suite of RL algorithms that leverage task structure under uncertain interpretation of domain-specific vocabulary. Theoretical analysis exposes pitfalls in naive approaches to this problem, while experimental results show that our algorithms successfully leverage task structure to improve performance under noisy interpretations of the vocabulary. Our results provide a general framework for exploiting Reward Machines in partially observable environments.

Read more

6/18/2024