Detecting Machine-Generated Texts: Not Just AI vs Humans and Explainability is Complicated
2406.18259
0
0
🤖
Abstract
As LLMs rapidly advance, increasing concerns arise regarding risks about actual authorship of texts we see online and in real world. The task of distinguishing LLM-authored texts is complicated by the nuanced and overlapping behaviors of both machines and humans. In this paper, we challenge the current practice of considering LLM-generated text detection a binary classification task of differentiating human from AI. Instead, we introduce a novel ternary text classification scheme, adding an undecided category for texts that could be attributed to either source, and we show that this new category is crucial to understand how to make the detection result more explainable to lay users. This research shifts the paradigm from merely classifying to explaining machine-generated texts, emphasizing need for detectors to provide clear and understandable explanations to users. Our study involves creating four new datasets comprised of texts from various LLMs and human authors. Based on new datasets, we performed binary classification tests to ascertain the most effective SOTA detection methods and identified SOTA LLMs capable of producing harder-to-detect texts. We constructed a new dataset of texts generated by two top-performing LLMs and human authors, and asked three human annotators to produce ternary labels with explanation notes. This dataset was used to investigate how three top-performing SOTA detectors behave in new ternary classification context. Our results highlight why undecided category is much needed from the viewpoint of explainability. Additionally, we conducted an analysis of explainability of the three best-performing detectors and the explanation notes of the human annotators, revealing insights about the complexity of explainable detection of machine-generated texts. Finally, we propose guidelines for developing future detection systems with improved explanatory power.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- As large language models (LLMs) rapidly advance, concerns are growing about the risks of distinguishing LLM-authored texts from human-authored texts.
- The current practice of considering LLM-generated text detection as a binary classification task (human vs. AI) is challenged in this paper.
- A novel ternary text classification scheme is introduced, adding an "undecided" category for texts that could be attributed to either source.
- The research shifts the focus from merely classifying to explaining machine-generated texts, emphasizing the need for detectors to provide clear and understandable explanations to users.
Plain English Explanation
As advanced AI language models become more capable, it's becoming increasingly difficult to tell whether a given text was written by a human or generated by a machine. This is a growing concern, as it could lead to issues around trust, transparency, and the authenticity of online content.
The traditional approach to detecting machine-generated text has been to treat it as a binary classification problem - either the text is human-written or it's AI-generated. However, the authors of this paper argue that this approach is too simplistic. They propose a new ternary classification scheme, which adds a third "undecided" category for texts that could plausibly be attributed to either humans or machines.
The key insight here is that being able to identify and explain these "undecided" cases is crucial for making text detection systems more transparent and understandable to non-expert users. Rather than just labeling a piece of text as "human" or "AI," the authors believe these systems should provide clear explanations to help people understand the rationale behind the classification.
This shift in focus - from simple binary classification to more nuanced and explanatory detection - is the core contribution of this research. The authors believe it's an important step towards developing text detection systems that are more useful and trustworthy for the general public.
Technical Explanation
To investigate this new ternary classification approach, the researchers created four new datasets comprised of texts from various LLMs and human authors. They then performed binary classification tests to assess the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection methods and identify SOTA LLMs capable of producing harder-to-detect texts.
Next, the team constructed a new dataset of texts generated by two top-performing LLMs and human authors, and asked three human annotators to produce ternary labels (human, AI, or undecided) with explanation notes. This dataset was used to investigate how three top-performing SOTA detectors behave in the new ternary classification context.
The results highlight the importance of the undecided category, as the detectors struggled to consistently classify certain texts. The researchers also analyzed the explainability of the three best-performing detectors and the explanation notes provided by the human annotators, revealing insights about the complexity of explainable detection of machine-generated texts.
Based on these findings, the authors propose guidelines for developing future detection systems with improved explanatory power, emphasizing the need to go beyond binary classification and provide users with clear and understandable explanations of the classification decisions.
Critical Analysis
While the researchers make a compelling case for the importance of ternary classification and explanatory text detection systems, the paper does not delve into some potential limitations and areas for further research.
For example, the authors do not address how the undecided category might be interpreted or used in real-world applications. Would an "undecided" classification be seen as a failure of the system, or could it be presented as a valuable insight to users? Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or inconsistencies that may arise in the human annotation process used to create the ternary dataset.
Further research could also investigate the scalability and robustness of the ternary classification approach, as well as its applicability to a wider range of LLM-generated content, such as social media posts, news articles, or scientific literature. Exploring the impact of this approach on user trust and decision-making would also be a valuable area of study.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel and important perspective on the challenge of distinguishing LLM-generated texts from human-authored content. By introducing a ternary classification scheme and emphasizing the need for explainable detection systems, the researchers have shifted the focus from simple binary classification to a more nuanced and user-centric approach.
The insights and guidelines proposed in this work could have significant implications for the development of future text detection systems, which will need to balance accuracy, transparency, and usability to effectively address the growing concerns around the authenticity of online information. As LLMs continue to advance, this research represents an important step towards more trustworthy and explainable approaches to managing the risks associated with machine-generated content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Text
Mazal Bethany, Brandon Wherry, Emet Bethany, Nishant Vishwamitra, Anthony Rios, Peyman Najafirad
0
0
With the recent proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), there has been an increasing demand for tools to detect machine-generated text. The effective detection of machine-generated text face two pertinent problems: First, they are severely limited in generalizing against real-world scenarios, where machine-generated text is produced by a variety of generators, including but not limited to GPT-4 and Dolly, and spans diverse domains, ranging from academic manuscripts to social media posts. Second, existing detection methodologies treat texts produced by LLMs through a restrictive binary classification lens, neglecting the nuanced diversity of artifacts generated by different LLMs. In this work, we undertake a systematic study on the detection of machine-generated text in real-world scenarios. We first study the effectiveness of state-of-the-art approaches and find that they are severely limited against text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. Furthermore, t-SNE visualizations of the embeddings from a pretrained LLM's encoder show that they cannot reliably distinguish between human and machine-generated text. Based on our findings, we introduce a novel system, T5LLMCipher, for detecting machine-generated text using a pretrained T5 encoder combined with LLM embedding sub-clustering to address the text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. We evaluate our approach across 9 machine-generated text systems and 9 domains and find that our approach provides state-of-the-art generalization ability, with an average increase in F1 score on machine-generated text of 19.6% on unseen generators and domains compared to the top performing existing approaches and correctly attributes the generator of text with an accuracy of 93.6%.
4/4/2024
Exploring the Limitations of Detecting Machine-Generated Text
Jad Doughman, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Hawau Olamide Toyin, Shady Shehata, Preslav Nakov, Zeerak Talat
0
0
Recent improvements in the quality of the generations by large language models have spurred research into identifying machine-generated text. Systems proposed for the task often achieve high performance. However, humans and machines can produce text in different styles and in different domains, and it remains unclear whether machine generated-text detection models favour particular styles or domains. In this paper, we critically examine the classification performance for detecting machine-generated text by evaluating on texts with varying writing styles. We find that classifiers are highly sensitive to stylistic changes and differences in text complexity, and in some cases degrade entirely to random classifiers. We further find that detection systems are particularly susceptible to misclassify easy-to-read texts while they have high performance for complex texts.
6/18/2024
🎲
A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan, Yulin Yuan, Derek F. Wong, Lidia S. Chao
0
0
The powerful ability to understand, follow, and generate complex language emerging from large language models (LLMs) makes LLM-generated text flood many areas of our daily lives at an incredible speed and is widely accepted by humans. As LLMs continue to expand, there is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text. This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content. The LLM-generated text detection aims to discern if a piece of text was produced by an LLM, which is essentially a binary classification task. The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods. In this survey, we collate recent research breakthroughs in this area and underscore the pressing need to bolster detector research. We also delve into prevalent datasets, elucidating their limitations and developmental requirements. Furthermore, we analyze various LLM-generated text detection paradigms, shedding light on challenges like out-of-distribution problems, potential attacks, real-world data issues and the lack of effective evaluation framework. Conclusively, we highlight interesting directions for future research in LLM-generated text detection to advance the implementation of responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our aim with this survey is to provide a clear and comprehensive introduction for newcomers while also offering seasoned researchers a valuable update in the field of LLM-generated text detection. The useful resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/NLP2CT/LLM-generated-Text-Detection.
4/22/2024
🔎
Deepfake Text Detection in the Wild
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection to mitigate risks like the spread of fake news and plagiarism. Existing research has been constrained by evaluating detection methods on specific domains or particular language models. In practical scenarios, however, the detector faces texts from various domains or LLMs without knowing their sources. To this end, we build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Empirical results show challenges in distinguishing machine-generated texts from human-authored ones across various scenarios, especially out-of-distribution. These challenges are due to the decreasing linguistic distinctions between the two sources. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. We release our resources at https://github.com/yafuly/MAGE.
5/22/2024