Detecting Unsuccessful Students in Cybersecurity Exercises in Two Different Learning Environments
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores methods for detecting unsuccessful students in cybersecurity exercises across two different learning environments.
- The research was funded by the European Union and the National Science Foundation.
- The study aimed to develop techniques to identify struggling students early and provide timely interventions to support their learning.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper wanted to find better ways to identify students who were having trouble in their cybersecurity training courses. They looked at students' performance in two different types of learning environments - one more traditional and one more hands-on and interactive.
By analyzing the students' actions and behaviors during these cybersecurity exercises, the researchers developed techniques to detect when students were struggling or falling behind. The goal was to be able to identify these struggling students early on, so that instructors could provide them with extra support and help them get back on track.
The researchers used a variety of data sources, including tracking how students interacted with the course materials and exercises, to build their detection models. They tested these models in the two different learning environments to see how well they worked in each context.
Ultimately, the researchers hoped that by being able to identify struggling students early, instructors could step in and provide personalized assistance. This could help more students successfully complete their cybersecurity training and become skilled, competent professionals in the field.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study that aimed to detect unsuccessful students in cybersecurity exercises across two different learning environments: a traditional classroom setting and a more interactive, hands-on learning environment.
The researchers collected data on student performance and behaviors during these cybersecurity exercises, including tracking their interactions with course materials and their progress through the exercises. They then developed machine learning models to analyze this data and identify patterns associated with struggling or unsuccessful students.
The models were trained and tested across the two learning environments to evaluate their effectiveness in each context. The researchers compared the performance of the models and analyzed the key factors and features that were most predictive of student struggles.
The insights from this research could enable instructors to quickly identify students who are falling behind or having difficulty, so that they can provide timely interventions and personalized support to help those students succeed. This could lead to improved outcomes for students in cybersecurity education programs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous and well-designed study that explores an important challenge in cybersecurity education - how to effectively detect and support struggling students. The use of data from two distinct learning environments adds valuable breadth to the research.
However, the paper does note some limitations, such as the potential for biases in the data collection and the need for further validation of the detection models in additional contexts. There is also an acknowledgement that more work is needed to understand the root causes of student struggles and how best to design interventions to address them.
Additionally, while the paper focuses on the technical aspects of the detection models, it would be interesting to see more discussion around the pedagogical and instructional implications of this work. How can instructors leverage these insights to improve their teaching and better support all students in mastering cybersecurity skills?
Overall, this is a well-executed study that offers promising directions for enhancing student success in cybersecurity education programs. Continued research and innovation in this area could have significant benefits for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
Conclusion
This paper presents a valuable approach for detecting struggling students in cybersecurity education programs. By analyzing student performance data across different learning environments, the researchers developed machine learning models that can identify when students are falling behind or having difficulties.
The ability to quickly detect these issues allows instructors to intervene and provide personalized support to help students get back on track. This could lead to improved outcomes and stronger, more capable cybersecurity professionals entering the workforce.
While the technical aspects of the detection models are the primary focus, the broader implications of this work for effective cybersecurity education and training are significant. Continued research and refinement of these techniques could have a meaningful impact on how we prepare the next generation of cybersecurity experts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Detecting Unsuccessful Students in Cybersecurity Exercises in Two Different Learning Environments
Valdemar v{S}v'abensk'y, Kristi'an Tk'av{c}ik, Aubrey Birdwell, Richard Weiss, Ryan S. Baker, Pavel v{C}eleda, Jan Vykopal, Jens Mache, Ankur Chattopadhyay
This full paper in the research track evaluates the usage of data logged from cybersecurity exercises in order to predict students who are potentially at risk of performing poorly. Hands-on exercises are essential for learning since they enable students to practice their skills. In cybersecurity, hands-on exercises are often complex and require knowledge of many topics. Therefore, students may miss solutions due to gaps in their knowledge and become frustrated, which impedes their learning. Targeted aid by the instructor helps, but since the instructor's time is limited, efficient ways to detect struggling students are needed. This paper develops automated tools to predict when a student is having difficulty. We formed a dataset with the actions of 313 students from two countries and two learning environments: KYPO CRP and EDURange. These data are used in machine learning algorithms to predict the success of students in exercises deployed in these environments. After extracting features from the data, we trained and cross-validated eight classifiers for predicting the exercise outcome and evaluated their predictive power. The contribution of this paper is comparing two approaches to feature engineering, modeling, and classification performance on data from two learning environments. Using the features from either learning environment, we were able to detect and distinguish between successful and struggling students. A decision tree classifier achieved the highest balanced accuracy and sensitivity with data from both learning environments. The results show that activity data from cybersecurity exercises are suitable for predicting student success. In a potential application, such models can aid instructors in detecting struggling students and providing targeted help. We publish data and code for building these models so that others can adopt or adapt them.
Read more8/19/2024
0
An Approach to Detect Abnormal Submissions for CodeWorkout Dataset
Alex Hicks, Yang Shi, Arun-Balajiee Lekshmi-Narayanan, Wei Yan, Samiha Marwan
Students interactions while solving problems in learning environments (i.e. log data) are often used to support students learning. For example, researchers use log data to develop systems that can provide students with personalized problem recommendations based on their knowledge level. However, anomalies in the students log data, such as cheating to solve programming problems, could introduce a hidden bias in the log data. As a result, these systems may provide inaccurate problem recommendations, and therefore, defeat their purpose. Classical cheating detection methods, such as MOSS, can be used to detect code plagiarism. However, these methods cannot detect other abnormal events such as a student gaming a system with multiple attempts of similar solutions to a particular programming problem. This paper presents a preliminary study to analyze log data with anomalies. The goal of our work is to overcome the abnormal instances when modeling personalizable recommendations in programming learning environments.
Read more7/26/2024
✨
0
Reliable Feature Selection for Adversarially Robust Cyber-Attack Detection
Jo~ao Vitorino, Miguel Silva, Eva Maia, Isabel Prac{c}a
The growing cybersecurity threats make it essential to use high-quality data to train Machine Learning (ML) models for network traffic analysis, without noisy or missing data. By selecting the most relevant features for cyber-attack detection, it is possible to improve both the robustness and computational efficiency of the models used in a cybersecurity system. This work presents a feature selection and consensus process that combines multiple methods and applies them to several network datasets. Two different feature sets were selected and were used to train multiple ML models with regular and adversarial training. Finally, an adversarial evasion robustness benchmark was performed to analyze the reliability of the different feature sets and their impact on the susceptibility of the models to adversarial examples. By using an improved dataset with more data diversity, selecting the best time-related features and a more specific feature set, and performing adversarial training, the ML models were able to achieve a better adversarially robust generalization. The robustness of the models was significantly improved without their generalization to regular traffic flows being affected, without increases of false alarms, and without requiring too many computational resources, which enables a reliable detection of suspicious activity and perturbed traffic flows in enterprise computer networks.
Read more4/8/2024
0
An Investigation into the Performances of the State-of-the-art Machine Learning Approaches for Various Cyber-attack Detection: A Survey
Tosin Ige, Christopher Kiekintveld, Aritran Piplai
In this research, we analyzed the suitability of each of the current state-of-the-art machine learning models for various cyberattack detection from the past 5 years with a major emphasis on the most recent works for comparative study to identify the knowledge gap where work is still needed to be done with regard to detection of each category of cyberattack. We also reviewed the suitability, effeciency and limitations of recent research on state-of-the-art classifiers and novel frameworks in the detection of differnet cyberattacks. Our result shows the need for; further research and exploration on machine learning approach for the detection of drive-by download attacks, an investigation into the mix performance of Naive Bayes to identify possible research direction on improvement to existing state-of-the-art Naive Bayes classifier, we also identify that current machine learning approach to the detection of SQLi attack cannot detect an already compromised database with SQLi attack signifying another possible future research direction.
Read more5/13/2024