An Approach to Detect Abnormal Submissions for CodeWorkout Dataset
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an approach to detect abnormal submissions in the CodeWorkout dataset.
- The goal is to identify unusual or suspicious programming assignments that may indicate academic dishonesty or other issues.
- The researchers use machine learning techniques to analyze code submissions and identify anomalies.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a method for identifying unusual or problematic programming assignments in the CodeWorkout dataset. CodeWorkout is a platform used by students to practice and submit coding exercises.
The researchers wanted to find a way to automatically detect when a student's submission might be suspect, such as if they copied code or used unauthorized tools. To do this, they developed a machine learning model that analyzes the characteristics of each submission, like the code structure, programming style, and any unusual patterns.
By looking for anomalies in the submissions, the model can flag assignments that are outliers compared to the typical student work. This could help instructors identify potential cases of academic dishonesty or other issues that need further investigation.
The key idea is to use data science techniques to supplement human oversight and catch problems that might be hard for instructors to spot on their own, given the large number of submissions they need to review.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a two-stage approach to detecting abnormal submissions in the CodeWorkout dataset. First, the researchers extract various features from the code submissions, including structural properties, programming style metrics, and other statistical characteristics.
They then use an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm to identify submissions that are outliers compared to the overall distribution of features. Specifically, they employ an isolation forest model, which builds an ensemble of decision trees to isolate anomalous data points.
To evaluate the approach, the researchers conducted experiments on a sample of the CodeWorkout dataset. They found that the anomaly detection model was able to identify a number of submissions that were flagged as potentially problematic by human experts.
The paper also discusses some limitations of the approach, such as the potential for false positives and the need for further validation against ground truth data on academic dishonesty cases.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a reasonable approach to addressing the important problem of detecting academic dishonesty in online programming assignments. The use of unsupervised anomaly detection is a logical choice given the lack of labeled data on cheating cases.
However, the paper could be strengthened by a more thorough evaluation of the model's performance. While the researchers show that it can identify some anomalies, they don't provide clear metrics on the accuracy, precision, and recall of the approach. More validation against confirmed cases of academic dishonesty would help establish the real-world efficacy of the method.
Additionally, the paper could explore how the anomaly detection system could be integrated into the CodeWorkout platform or similar systems to provide real-time alerts to instructors. Implementing such a system and studying its impact on educational outcomes would be a valuable next step.
Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of data-driven techniques to enhance academic integrity, but further research is needed to fully realize the benefits.
Conclusion
This paper presents a machine learning approach to detecting abnormal submissions in the CodeWorkout dataset, with the goal of identifying potential cases of academic dishonesty. By extracting features from code submissions and using an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm, the researchers were able to flag outlier assignments that may warrant further investigation.
While the initial results are promising, the authors acknowledge the need for more comprehensive validation and integration into real-world educational platforms. Nonetheless, this work highlights the value of applying data science techniques to enhance academic integrity and support instructors in maintaining high standards of student work.
As online and automated learning continue to grow, tools like this will become increasingly important to ensure the fairness and quality of educational outcomes. The findings from this paper lay the groundwork for further research and development in this critical area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An Approach to Detect Abnormal Submissions for CodeWorkout Dataset
Alex Hicks, Yang Shi, Arun-Balajiee Lekshmi-Narayanan, Wei Yan, Samiha Marwan
Students interactions while solving problems in learning environments (i.e. log data) are often used to support students learning. For example, researchers use log data to develop systems that can provide students with personalized problem recommendations based on their knowledge level. However, anomalies in the students log data, such as cheating to solve programming problems, could introduce a hidden bias in the log data. As a result, these systems may provide inaccurate problem recommendations, and therefore, defeat their purpose. Classical cheating detection methods, such as MOSS, can be used to detect code plagiarism. However, these methods cannot detect other abnormal events such as a student gaming a system with multiple attempts of similar solutions to a particular programming problem. This paper presents a preliminary study to analyze log data with anomalies. The goal of our work is to overcome the abnormal instances when modeling personalizable recommendations in programming learning environments.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Detecting Unsuccessful Students in Cybersecurity Exercises in Two Different Learning Environments
Valdemar v{S}v'abensk'y, Kristi'an Tk'av{c}ik, Aubrey Birdwell, Richard Weiss, Ryan S. Baker, Pavel v{C}eleda, Jan Vykopal, Jens Mache, Ankur Chattopadhyay
This full paper in the research track evaluates the usage of data logged from cybersecurity exercises in order to predict students who are potentially at risk of performing poorly. Hands-on exercises are essential for learning since they enable students to practice their skills. In cybersecurity, hands-on exercises are often complex and require knowledge of many topics. Therefore, students may miss solutions due to gaps in their knowledge and become frustrated, which impedes their learning. Targeted aid by the instructor helps, but since the instructor's time is limited, efficient ways to detect struggling students are needed. This paper develops automated tools to predict when a student is having difficulty. We formed a dataset with the actions of 313 students from two countries and two learning environments: KYPO CRP and EDURange. These data are used in machine learning algorithms to predict the success of students in exercises deployed in these environments. After extracting features from the data, we trained and cross-validated eight classifiers for predicting the exercise outcome and evaluated their predictive power. The contribution of this paper is comparing two approaches to feature engineering, modeling, and classification performance on data from two learning environments. Using the features from either learning environment, we were able to detect and distinguish between successful and struggling students. A decision tree classifier achieved the highest balanced accuracy and sensitivity with data from both learning environments. The results show that activity data from cybersecurity exercises are suitable for predicting student success. In a potential application, such models can aid instructors in detecting struggling students and providing targeted help. We publish data and code for building these models so that others can adopt or adapt them.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study
Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li
As software systems grow increasingly intricate, the precise detection of anomalies have become both essential and challenging. Current log-based anomaly detection methods depend heavily on vast amounts of log data leading to inefficient inference and potential misguidance by noise logs. However, the quantitative effects of log reduction on the effectiveness of anomaly detection remain unexplored. Therefore, we first conduct a comprehensive study on six distinct models spanning three datasets. Through the study, the impact of log quantity and their effectiveness in representing anomalies is qualifies, uncovering three distinctive log event types that differently influence model performance. Drawing from these insights, we propose LogCleaner: an efficient methodology for the automatic reduction of log events in the context of anomaly detection. Serving as middleware between software systems and models, LogCleaner continuously updates and filters anti-events and duplicative-events in the raw generated logs. Experimental outcomes highlight LogCleaner's capability to reduce over 70% of log events in anomaly detection, accelerating the model's inference speed by approximately 300%, and universally improving the performance of models for anomaly detection.
Read more9/17/2024
0
LogiCode: an LLM-Driven Framework for Logical Anomaly Detection
Yiheng Zhang, Yunkang Cao, Xiaohao Xu, Weiming Shen
This paper presents LogiCode, a novel framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for identifying logical anomalies in industrial settings, moving beyond traditional focus on structural inconsistencies. By harnessing LLMs for logical reasoning, LogiCode autonomously generates Python codes to pinpoint anomalies such as incorrect component quantities or missing elements, marking a significant leap forward in anomaly detection technologies. A custom dataset LOCO-Annotations and a benchmark LogiBench are introduced to evaluate the LogiCode's performance across various metrics including binary classification accuracy, code generation success rate, and precision in reasoning. Findings demonstrate LogiCode's enhanced interpretability, significantly improving the accuracy of logical anomaly detection and offering detailed explanations for identified anomalies. This represents a notable shift towards more intelligent, LLM-driven approaches in industrial anomaly detection, promising substantial impacts on industry-specific applications.
Read more6/10/2024