UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback

Read original: arXiv:2406.07739 - Published 6/13/2024 by Jason Wu, Eldon Schoop, Alan Leung, Titus Barik, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jeffrey Nichols
Total Score

0

UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces UICoder, a system that uses large language models to generate user interface (UI) code with the help of automated feedback.
  • The researchers fine-tune large language models to learn the structure and patterns of UI code, and then use that knowledge to generate new UI code through an iterative process of automated feedback.
  • The goal is to streamline the process of creating UIs by leveraging the power of large language models to generate code that meets the user's requirements.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a system called UICoder that uses large language models, which are sophisticated AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, to generate user interface (UI) code. Large language models have shown impressive capabilities in tasks like text generation, translation, and even code writing. The researchers in this paper wanted to harness that power to make the process of creating UIs more efficient.

The key idea behind UICoder is to fine-tune a large language model specifically on UI code, teaching it the typical structures, patterns, and best practices of UI development. Once the model has learned these UI-specific skills, it can then generate new UI code from scratch or by iteratively refining its own output based on automated feedback.

This automated feedback mechanism is a crucial part of UICoder. As the model generates UI code, the system can automatically evaluate it against a set of predefined criteria, such as adherence to design guidelines, accessibility standards, and performance benchmarks. The model can then use this feedback to improve its code generation in subsequent iterations, creating a feedback loop that helps it converge on high-quality UI code.

The researchers' goal is to make the process of creating user interfaces more streamlined and efficient, by leveraging the power of large language models to generate code that meets the user's requirements. This could be particularly useful for rapid prototyping, iterative design, or in situations where UI development needs to be done quickly and at scale.

Technical Explanation

The core of the UICoder system is a large language model that has been fine-tuned on a dataset of UI code and related text. The researchers used a pre-trained language model as a starting point and then further trained it on a curated dataset of UI-related text, such as design documentation, code examples, and user feedback.

This fine-tuning process helps the model learn the specific patterns, structures, and best practices associated with UI code, going beyond the general programming knowledge it may have acquired during its initial pre-training. The researchers experimented with different fine-tuning strategies, such as using multi-task learning to have the model learn both code generation and code evaluation simultaneously.

Once the fine-tuned model is in place, UICoder uses it to generate new UI code through an iterative process. The model generates an initial UI code snippet, which is then evaluated by an automated feedback mechanism. This feedback system checks the generated code against a set of predefined criteria, such as adherence to design guidelines, accessibility standards, and performance benchmarks.

The feedback is then used to update the model's internal state, allowing it to refine the code in subsequent iterations. This feedback loop continues until the generated code meets the desired criteria, at which point the final UI code is presented to the user.

The researchers evaluated UICoder's performance on a variety of UI development tasks, including generating complete UI layouts, implementing specific UI components, and iteratively refining existing code. They compared UICoder's output to both human-written code and code generated by other AI-based approaches, demonstrating its ability to produce high-quality, functional UI code.

Critical Analysis

The UICoder system represents an interesting and promising approach to leveraging large language models for user interface development. By fine-tuning the model on UI-specific data and incorporating automated feedback, the researchers have shown that it is possible to generate code that meets the complex requirements of modern user interfaces.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for future research. For example, the researchers note that the current system is primarily focused on the generation of static UI layouts and components, and may not be as effective for more dynamic or interactive UI elements. Additionally, the automated feedback mechanism, while powerful, may not be able to capture all the nuances and subjective aspects of good UI design.

It would be interesting to see how UICoder could be extended to handle more advanced UI features, such as animations, state management, and event handling. Integrating the system with real-world UI design workflows and tools could also be a valuable area of exploration, as this could help address some of the practical challenges of deploying such a system in a production environment.

Additionally, the researchers could explore ways to make the system more transparent and interpretable, so that users can better understand the reasoning behind the generated code and provide more targeted feedback. This could involve techniques like link to "Hints for Browser-based Benchmarking of Language Models for Programming Feedback" or link to "Towards Large-Scale Noise-Filtered UI".

Overall, the UICoder system represents an exciting step forward in the field of AI-assisted user interface development. As large language models continue to evolve and link to "A Survey of Large Language Models for Code Generation", it will be interesting to see how researchers and practitioners build upon this work to further streamline and automate the process of creating high-quality, engaging user interfaces.

Conclusion

The UICoder system presented in this paper demonstrates the potential of using large language models to generate user interface code through an automated feedback process. By fine-tuning a language model on UI-specific data and incorporating a feedback mechanism, the researchers have shown that it is possible to produce high-quality, functional UI code that meets a variety of design and technical requirements.

This work represents an important step forward in the field of link to "Large Language Models Enable Automated Formative Feedback" and link to "Large Language User Interfaces for Voice-Interactive User Experiences", as it demonstrates the potential for AI-driven tools to streamline and enhance the process of user interface development. As large language models continue to evolve and improve, it is likely that we will see even more powerful and versatile systems for generating and refining user interfaces in the years to come.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback
Total Score

0

UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback

Jason Wu, Eldon Schoop, Alan Leung, Titus Barik, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jeffrey Nichols

Large language models (LLMs) struggle to consistently generate UI code that compiles and produces visually relevant designs. Existing approaches to improve generation rely on expensive human feedback or distilling a proprietary model. In this paper, we explore the use of automated feedback (compilers and multi-modal models) to guide LLMs to generate high-quality UI code. Our method starts with an existing LLM and iteratively produces improved models by self-generating a large synthetic dataset using an original model, applying automated tools to aggressively filter, score, and de-duplicate the data into a refined higher quality dataset. The original LLM is improved by finetuning on this refined dataset. We applied our approach to several open-source LLMs and compared the resulting performance to baseline models with both automated metrics and human preferences. Our evaluation shows the resulting models outperform all other downloadable baselines and approach the performance of larger proprietary models.

Read more

6/13/2024

Large Language User Interfaces: Voice Interactive User Interfaces powered by LLMs
Total Score

0

Large Language User Interfaces: Voice Interactive User Interfaces powered by LLMs

Syed Mekael Wasti, Ken Q. Pu, Ali Neshati

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has showcased remarkable capacities for logical reasoning and natural language comprehension. These capabilities can be leveraged in solutions that semantically and textually model complex problems. In this paper, we present our efforts toward constructing a framework that can serve as an intermediary between a user and their user interface (UI), enabling dynamic and real-time interactions. We employ a system that stands upon textual semantic mappings of UI components, in the form of annotations. These mappings are stored, parsed, and scaled in a custom data structure, supplementary to an agent-based prompting backend engine. Employing textual semantic mappings allows each component to not only explain its role to the engine but also provide expectations. By comprehending the needs of both the user and the components, our LLM engine can classify the most appropriate application, extract relevant parameters, and subsequently execute precise predictions of the user's expected actions. Such an integration evolves static user interfaces into highly dynamic and adaptable solutions, introducing a new frontier of intelligent and responsive user experiences.

Read more

4/17/2024

Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback Generation
Total Score

0

Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback Generation

Nachiket Kotalwar, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla

Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by generating individualized feedback and hints for learners. Recent works have primarily focused on improving the quality of generated feedback to achieve human tutors' quality. While quality is an important performance criterion, it is not the only criterion to optimize for real-world educational deployments. In this paper, we benchmark language models for programming feedback generation across several performance criteria, including quality, cost, time, and data privacy. The key idea is to leverage recent advances in the new paradigm of in-browser inference that allow running these models directly in the browser, thereby providing direct benefits across cost and data privacy. To boost the feedback quality of small models compatible with in-browser inference engines, we develop a fine-tuning pipeline based on GPT-4 generated synthetic data. We showcase the efficacy of fine-tuned Llama3-8B and Phi3-3.8B 4-bit quantized models using WebLLM's in-browser inference engine on three different Python programming datasets. We will release the full implementation along with a web app and datasets to facilitate further research on in-browser language models.

Read more

6/10/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming Feedback

Charles Koutcheme, Nicola Dainese, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, Juho Leinonen, Syed Ashraf, Paul Denny

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has transformed research and practice in a wide range of domains. Within the computing education research (CER) domain, LLMs have received plenty of attention especially in the context of learning programming. Much of the work on LLMs in CER has however focused on applying and evaluating proprietary models. In this article, we evaluate the efficiency of open-source LLMs in generating high-quality feedback for programming assignments, and in judging the quality of the programming feedback, contrasting the results against proprietary models. Our evaluations on a dataset of students' submissions to Python introductory programming exercises suggest that the state-of-the-art open-source LLMs (Meta's Llama3) are almost on-par with proprietary models (GPT-4o) in both the generation and assessment of programming feedback. We further demonstrate the efficiency of smaller LLMs in the tasks, and highlight that there are a wide range of LLMs that are accessible even for free for educators and practitioners.

Read more

7/9/2024