Differentially Private Fair Binary Classifications
2402.15603
0
0
🏅
Abstract
In this work, we investigate binary classification under the constraints of both differential privacy and fairness. We first propose an algorithm based on the decoupling technique for learning a classifier with only fairness guarantee. This algorithm takes in classifiers trained on different demographic groups and generates a single classifier satisfying statistical parity. We then refine this algorithm to incorporate differential privacy. The performance of the final algorithm is rigorously examined in terms of privacy, fairness, and utility guarantees. Empirical evaluations conducted on the Adult and Credit Card datasets illustrate that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of fairness guarantees, while maintaining the same level of privacy and utility.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to ensuring fairness in binary classification models while also preserving differential privacy.
- The researchers develop a post-processing algorithm that can transform any binary classifier into one that satisfies demographic parity and equal opportunity constraints, while also providing differential privacy guarantees.
- The paper explores the trade-offs between fairness, accuracy, and privacy, and provides theoretical guarantees and empirical results to validate their approach.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a machine learning model that needs to make decisions, like whether to approve a loan application or not. You want this model to be fair - meaning it doesn't discriminate against certain groups of people, like based on their race or gender. At the same time, you also want to protect the privacy of the data used to train the model, so that sensitive information about individuals isn't exposed.
The researchers in this paper came up with a way to achieve both fairness and privacy in these kinds of binary classification models. They developed a post-processing algorithm that can take any existing binary classifier and transform it to satisfy two key fairness constraints: demographic parity (ensuring the model's decisions don't depend on sensitive attributes like race or gender) and equal opportunity (ensuring the model has similar true positive rates across different groups).
Importantly, this post-processing step also provides a strong privacy guarantee, known as differential privacy. This means that even if an attacker had access to the model's outputs, they wouldn't be able to learn much about the individuals in the original training data.
The paper explores the trade-offs between fairness, accuracy, and privacy, and provides mathematical proofs to show their approach works. They also test it on real-world datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness in practice.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the problem of ensuring fairness in binary classification models while also preserving differential privacy. The authors develop a post-processing algorithm that can transform any binary classifier into one that satisfies demographic parity and equal opportunity constraints, while also providing differential privacy guarantees.
The key technical contributions are:
- Formulating the problem of fair and private binary classification as a constrained optimization problem.
- Designing a post-processing algorithm that solves this optimization problem, producing a fair and private classifier from any given base classifier.
- Providing theoretical guarantees on the fairness, privacy, and accuracy of the resulting classifier.
- Validating the approach empirically on several real-world datasets, demonstrating the trade-offs between fairness, privacy, and accuracy.
The post-processing algorithm works by first training a base classifier without any fairness or privacy constraints. It then adjusts the classifier's outputs to satisfy the desired fairness criteria, while also adding noise to the outputs to achieve differential privacy. The authors prove that this approach preserves the original classifier's accuracy as much as possible while ensuring fairness and privacy.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to the important challenge of balancing fairness, privacy, and accuracy in binary classification models. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of the proposed method.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The approach assumes the base classifier is already trained, and does not consider the impact of fairness and privacy constraints on the initial model training process.
- The paper focuses on binary classification, but many real-world applications involve more complex, multi-class problems that may require different fairness and privacy considerations.
- The empirical evaluation is limited to a few datasets, and it would be valuable to test the method on a wider range of applications and data types.
- The paper does not explore the potential for group-fair classifiers that can provide more nuanced fairness guarantees beyond the demographic parity and equal opportunity constraints considered here.
Despite these limitations, the research presented in this paper represents an important step towards developing fair and private machine learning systems that can be responsibly deployed in high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to ensuring fairness and privacy in binary classification models. By developing a post-processing algorithm that can transform any base classifier to satisfy demographic parity and equal opportunity constraints while also providing differential privacy guarantees, the researchers have made a significant contribution to the field of machine learning fairness and privacy.
The theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of this method and the inherent trade-offs between fairness, accuracy, and privacy. While further research is needed to address the limitations, this work represents an important step towards developing responsible AI systems that can be deployed in real-world applications with confidence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression
Ruicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath, Han Zhao
0
0
This paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error.
5/8/2024
Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness
Mengmeng Yang, Ming Ding, Youyang Qu, Wei Ni, David Smith, Thierry Rakotoarivelo
0
0
The worldwide adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning models, particularly in critical sectors, such as healthcare and finance, presents substantial challenges in maintaining individual privacy and fairness. These two elements are vital to a trustworthy environment for learning systems. While numerous studies have concentrated on protecting individual privacy through differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, emerging research indicates that differential privacy in machine learning models can unequally impact separate demographic subgroups regarding prediction accuracy. This leads to a fairness concern, and manifests as biased performance. Although the prevailing view is that enhancing privacy intensifies fairness disparities, a smaller, yet significant, subset of research suggests the opposite view. In this article, with extensive evaluation results, we demonstrate that the impact of differential privacy on fairness is not monotonous. Instead, we observe that the accuracy disparity initially grows as more DP noise (enhanced privacy) is added to the ML process, but subsequently diminishes at higher privacy levels with even more noise. Moreover, implementing gradient clipping in the differentially private stochastic gradient descent ML method can mitigate the negative impact of DP noise on fairness. This mitigation is achieved by moderating the disparity growth through a lower clipping threshold.
4/16/2024
🤷
A Systematic and Formal Study of the Impact of Local Differential Privacy on Fairness: Preliminary Results
Karima Makhlouf, Tamara Stefanovic, Heber H. Arcolezi, Catuscia Palamidessi
0
0
Machine learning (ML) algorithms rely primarily on the availability of training data, and, depending on the domain, these data may include sensitive information about the data providers, thus leading to significant privacy issues. Differential privacy (DP) is the predominant solution for privacy-preserving ML, and the local model of DP is the preferred choice when the server or the data collector are not trusted. Recent experimental studies have shown that local DP can impact ML prediction for different subgroups of individuals, thus affecting fair decision-making. However, the results are conflicting in the sense that some studies show a positive impact of privacy on fairness while others show a negative one. In this work, we conduct a systematic and formal study of the effect of local DP on fairness. Specifically, we perform a quantitative study of how the fairness of the decisions made by the ML model changes under local DP for different levels of privacy and data distributions. In particular, we provide bounds in terms of the joint distributions and the privacy level, delimiting the extent to which local DP can impact the fairness of the model. We characterize the cases in which privacy reduces discrimination and those with the opposite effect. We validate our theoretical findings on synthetic and real-world datasets. Our results are preliminary in the sense that, for now, we study only the case of one sensitive attribute, and only statistical disparity, conditional statistical disparity, and equal opportunity difference.
5/24/2024
💬
Fairness and Unfairness in Binary and Multiclass Classification: Quantifying, Calculating, and Bounding
Sivan Sabato, Eran Treister, Elad Yom-Tov
0
0
We propose a new interpretable measure of unfairness, that allows providing a quantitative analysis of classifier fairness, beyond a dichotomous fair/unfair distinction. We show how this measure can be calculated when the classifier's conditional confusion matrices are known. We further propose methods for auditing classifiers for their fairness when the confusion matrices cannot be obtained or even estimated. Our approach lower-bounds the unfairness of a classifier based only on aggregate statistics, which may be provided by the owner of the classifier or collected from freely available data. We use the equalized odds criterion, which we generalize to the multiclass case. We report experiments on data sets representing diverse applications, which demonstrate the effectiveness and the wide range of possible uses of the proposed methodology. An implementation of the procedures proposed in this paper and as the code for running the experiments are provided in https://github.com/sivansabato/unfairness.
4/9/2024