Diffusion Models With Learned Adaptive Noise

Overview

• Diffusion models are powerful algorithms for generating high-quality images
• The diffusion process, a set of equations that map data to noise, is central to these models
• This paper explores whether the diffusion process can be learned from data
• The goal is to improve log-likelihood estimation by casting the learned diffusion process as an approximate variational posterior

Plain English Explanation

Diffusion models are a type of artificial intelligence that can create realistic-looking images. At the heart of these models is the "diffusion process" - a set of mathematical equations that gradually transform the original data (like a photo) into random noise.

This paper investigates whether the diffusion process itself can be learned from data, rather than being pre-defined. The researchers believe that by learning the diffusion process, they can improve the models' ability to estimate the likelihood of the original data. This is important because it allows the models to generate images that are more true to the training data.

The key idea is to treat the learned diffusion process as an "approximate variational posterior" - a probability distribution that approximates the true, but unknown, distribution of the data. This leads to a tighter lower bound on the likelihood, meaning the model can better estimate how likely the original data is.

Importantly, the researchers challenge the assumption that the quality of this likelihood estimate is independent of the specific noise process used. Instead, they propose a "multivariate learned adaptive noise" (MULAN) approach, where the noise is applied at different rates across the image. This helps the model further improve its likelihood estimates.

Technical Explanation

The core of this work is centered around improving the log-likelihood estimation in diffusion models by learning the diffusion process itself. The authors ground their approach in Bayesian inference and cast the learned diffusion process as an approximate variational posterior. This yields a tighter lower bound (the ELBO) on the true data likelihood.

Previous work has assumed that the ELBO is invariant to the choice of noise process used in the diffusion. However, the authors show this assumption does not hold. They propose the MULAN method, which uses a multivariate noise schedule that adapts based on the input data. This ensures the ELBO is no longer invariant to the noise schedule, allowing for further improvements in density estimation.

Empirically, the authors demonstrate that MULAN sets a new state-of-the-art in density estimation on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets. Additionally, their method reduces the number of training steps required by 50% compared to previous approaches.

The authors' work builds upon and extends several related efforts in this space, including physics-informed diffusion models, versatile diffusion transformer with mixture of noise levels, stimulating diffusion models for image denoising, and learning mixtures of Gaussians using diffusion models.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for learning the diffusion process in diffusion models, rather than relying on a pre-defined one. By treating the learned diffusion process as an approximate variational posterior, the authors are able to derive a tighter lower bound on the likelihood, which is a significant theoretical contribution.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the learned diffusion process may be more computationally expensive or harder to optimize than a pre-defined one. Additionally, the authors do not explore the potential for the learned diffusion process to over-fit the training data, which could limit the model's ability to generalize to new samples.

Another area for further research would be to investigate the interpretability of the learned diffusion process. Understanding how the model adapts the noise schedule based on the input data could lead to valuable insights about the underlying structure of the data and the diffusion process itself.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the development of more powerful and flexible diffusion models. By challenging the assumption of ELBO invariance and proposing the MULAN method, the authors have made a significant contribution to the field of generative modeling.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to improving the performance of diffusion models by learning the diffusion process itself, rather than using a pre-defined one. By casting the learned diffusion process as an approximate variational posterior, the authors are able to derive a tighter lower bound on the data likelihood, leading to better density estimation and faster training.

The key innovation is the MULAN method, which uses a multivariate noise schedule that adapts to the input data. This ensures the ELBO is no longer invariant to the choice of noise process, allowing for further improvements in the model's ability to capture the underlying data distribution.

Empirically, the authors show that MULAN sets a new state-of-the-art in density estimation on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, while also reducing the number of training steps required by 50%. This represents a significant advancement in the field of generative modeling and could have important implications for a wide range of applications that rely on high-quality image synthesis.