Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning

2405.16194

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by Chun-Mao Lai, Hsiang-Chun Wang, Ping-Chun Hsieh, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Min-Hung Chen, Shao-Hua Sun
Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning

Abstract

Imitation learning aims to learn a policy from observing expert demonstrations without access to reward signals from environments. Generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) formulates imitation learning as adversarial learning, employing a generator policy learning to imitate expert behaviors and discriminator learning to distinguish the expert demonstrations from agent trajectories. Despite its encouraging results, GAIL training is often brittle and unstable. Inspired by the recent dominance of diffusion models in generative modeling, this work proposes Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL), which integrates a diffusion model into GAIL, aiming to yield more precise and smoother rewards for policy learning. Specifically, we propose a diffusion discriminative classifier to construct an enhanced discriminator; then, we design diffusion rewards based on the classifier's output for policy learning. We conduct extensive experiments in navigation, manipulation, and locomotion, verifying DRAIL's effectiveness compared to prior imitation learning methods. Moreover, additional experimental results demonstrate the generalizability and data efficiency of DRAIL. Visualized learned reward functions of GAIL and DRAIL suggest that DRAIL can produce more precise and smoother rewards.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel technique called Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL) for training agents to perform complex tasks by learning from demonstrations.
  • DRAIL combines the strengths of diffusion models and adversarial imitation learning to efficiently learn reward functions and policies from limited expert data.
  • The key idea is to use a diffusion model to gradually transform expert demonstrations into simpler, more learnable task representations, which are then used to train the agent's policy via adversarial imitation learning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a new way to teach AI agents how to perform complex tasks by learning from example demonstrations provided by human experts. The core idea is to use a technique called "diffusion" to gradually simplify the expert demonstrations, making them easier for the AI to learn from.

Diffusion is a process that gradually adds noise to data, transforming it into simpler, more basic representations. The researchers use this diffusion process to take the expert demonstrations and break them down into simpler versions, step-by-step. These simplified versions are then used to train the AI agent using a technique called "adversarial imitation learning."

Adversarial imitation learning works by having the AI agent compete against a "discriminator" model that tries to identify whether actions come from the expert demonstrations or the agent's own policy. By pitting the agent against this discriminator, the agent is encouraged to learn a policy that closely matches the expert's behavior.

The key advantage of this DRAIL approach is that it allows the AI to learn complex tasks from limited data. Instead of needing a huge number of expert demonstrations, the diffusion process can take a small set of demos and gradually transform them into simpler versions that the agent can more easily learn from. This makes the overall training process much more efficient and data-efficient.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a new imitation learning algorithm called Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL) that combines the strengths of diffusion models and adversarial imitation learning. The core idea is to use a diffusion process to gradually transform expert demonstrations into simpler, more learnable task representations, which are then used to train the agent's policy via adversarial imitation learning.

Specifically, DRAIL first trains a diffusion model to gradually add noise to the expert demonstrations, creating a sequence of increasingly simplified versions of the task. These simplified representations are then fed into an adversarial imitation learning framework, where a policy network competes against a discriminator network that tries to distinguish the agent's actions from the expert's. By learning to fool the discriminator, the policy network is encouraged to match the expert's behavior.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DRAIL on a range of continuous control tasks, including robotic manipulation and navigation. They show that DRAIL is able to achieve stronger performance compared to standard adversarial imitation learning approaches, especially when the number of expert demonstrations is limited.

The key innovation of this work is the integration of diffusion models into the imitation learning pipeline. By gradually simplifying the expert demonstrations, DRAIL is able to learn more robust and sample-efficient policies, overcoming some of the limitations of previous adversarial imitation learning methods.

Critical Analysis

The DRAIL approach presented in this paper offers a promising new direction for imitation learning, leveraging the strengths of diffusion models to improve the sample efficiency and performance of adversarial imitation learning. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization Capabilities: While DRAIL demonstrates strong performance on the evaluated tasks, it remains to be seen how well the learned policies can generalize to novel situations or unseen variations of the task. Further investigation is needed to understand the generalization capabilities of this approach.

  2. Computational Complexity: Training the diffusion model and the adversarial imitation learning components may incur significant computational overhead, especially for more complex tasks. The authors should provide a more detailed analysis of the computational requirements and scalability of the DRAIL approach.

  3. Interpretability and Explainability: As with many deep learning-based methods, the inner workings of the DRAIL model can be opaque, making it challenging to understand and explain the reasoning behind the agent's behaviors. Efforts to improve the interpretability of the learned policies could enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of this approach.

  4. Real-World Applicability: While the experiments in the paper cover a range of continuous control tasks, the authors should further explore the applicability of DRAIL to more complex, real-world scenarios, such as robotic manipulation in unstructured environments or autonomous navigation in dynamic urban settings.

Despite these potential limitations, the DRAIL approach presented in this paper represents a promising step forward in the field of imitation learning, combining the strengths of diffusion models and adversarial imitation learning to enable more efficient and effective policy learning from limited expert data.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique called Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL) that leverages the power of diffusion models to improve the sample efficiency and performance of adversarial imitation learning. By gradually simplifying expert demonstrations through a diffusion process, DRAIL is able to learn more robust and transferable policies from limited data, outperforming standard adversarial imitation learning approaches.

The key innovation of this work is the integration of diffusion models into the imitation learning pipeline, which allows for the extraction of more learnable task representations from expert demonstrations. This approach holds significant promise for advancing the state-of-the-art in imitation learning and enabling AI agents to acquire complex skills more efficiently, with potential applications in areas such as robotics, autonomous systems, and beyond.

While the paper presents promising results, further research is needed to address potential limitations related to generalization, computational complexity, interpretability, and real-world applicability. Nonetheless, the DRAIL framework represents an exciting step forward in the quest to develop more sample-efficient and capable imitation learning algorithms that can unlock the full potential of AI in a wide range of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🛸

Hierarchical Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning with Mid-level Input Generation for Autonomous Driving on Urban Environments

Gustavo Claudio Karl Couto, Eric Aislan Antonelo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deriving robust control policies for realistic urban navigation scenarios is not a trivial task. In an end-to-end approach, these policies must map high-dimensional images from the vehicle's cameras to low-level actions such as steering and throttle. While pure Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches are based exclusively on engineered rewards, Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (GAIL) agents learn from expert demonstrations while interacting with the environment, which favors GAIL on tasks for which a reward signal is difficult to derive, such as autonomous driving. However, training deep networks directly from raw images on RL tasks is known to be unstable and troublesome. To deal with that, this work proposes a hierarchical GAIL-based architecture (hGAIL) which decouples representation learning from the driving task to solve the autonomous navigation of a vehicle. The proposed architecture consists of two modules: a GAN (Generative Adversarial Net) which generates an abstract mid-level input representation, which is the Bird's-Eye View (BEV) from the surroundings of the vehicle; and the GAIL which learns to control the vehicle based on the BEV predictions from the GAN as input. hGAIL is able to learn both the policy and the mid-level representation simultaneously as the agent interacts with the environment. Our experiments made in the CARLA simulation environment have shown that GAIL exclusively from cameras without BEV) fails to even learn the task, while hGAIL, after training exclusively on one city, was able to autonomously navigate successfully in 98% of the intersections of a new city not used in training phase.

Read more

4/3/2024

Transferable Reward Learning by Dynamics-Agnostic Discriminator Ensemble

Fan-Ming Luo, Xingchen Cao, Rong-Jun Qin, Yang Yu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recovering reward function from expert demonstrations is a fundamental problem in reinforcement learning. The recovered reward function captures the motivation of the expert. Agents can imitate experts by following these reward functions in their environment, which is known as apprentice learning. However, the agents may face environments different from the demonstrations, and therefore, desire transferable reward functions. Classical reward learning methods such as inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) or, equivalently, adversarial imitation learning (AIL), recover reward functions coupled with training dynamics, which are hard to be transferable. Previous dynamics-agnostic reward learning methods rely on assumptions such as that the reward function has to be state-only, restricting their applicability. In this work, we present a dynamics-agnostic discriminator-ensemble reward learning method (DARL) within the AIL framework, capable of learning both state-action and state-only reward functions. DARL achieves this by decoupling the reward function from training dynamics, employing a dynamics-agnostic discriminator on a latent space derived from the original state-action space. This latent space is optimized to minimize information on the dynamics. We moreover discover the policy-dependency issue of the AIL framework that reduces the transferability. DARL represents the reward function as an ensemble of discriminators during training to eliminate policy dependencies. Empirical studies on MuJoCo tasks with changed dynamics show that DARL better recovers the reward function and results in better imitation performance in transferred environments, handling both state-only and state-action reward scenarios.

Read more

6/27/2024

RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning

RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning

Mert Albaba, Sammy Christen, Christoph Gebhardt, Thomas Langarek, Michael J. Black, Otmar Hilliges

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reinforcement Learning has achieved significant success in generating complex behavior but often requires extensive reward function engineering. Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. Employing discriminators increases their data- and computational efficiency over the standard approaches; however, results in sensitivity to imperfections in expert data. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency. In RILe, the student learns an action policy while the teacher dynamically adjusts a reward function based on the student's performance and its alignment with expert demonstrations. By tailoring the reward function to both performance of the student and expert similarity, our system reduces dependence on the discriminator and, hence, increases robustness against data imperfections. Experiments show that RILe outperforms existing methods by 2x in settings with limited or noisy expert data.

Read more

6/13/2024

Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery

Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery

Yangchun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Weiming Li, Yirui Zhou

YC

0

Reddit

0

Adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) stands as a cornerstone approach in imitation learning, yet it faces criticisms from prior studies. In this paper, we rethink AIRL and respond to these criticisms. Criticism 1 lies in Inadequate Policy Imitation. We show that substituting the built-in algorithm with soft actor-critic (SAC) during policy updating (requires multi-iterations) significantly enhances the efficiency of policy imitation. Criticism 2 lies in Limited Performance in Transferable Reward Recovery Despite SAC Integration. While we find that SAC indeed exhibits a significant improvement in policy imitation, it introduces drawbacks to transferable reward recovery. We prove that the SAC algorithm itself is not feasible to disentangle the reward function comprehensively during the AIRL training process, and propose a hybrid framework, PPO-AIRL + SAC, for a satisfactory transfer effect. Criticism 3 lies in Unsatisfactory Proof from the Perspective of Potential Equilibrium. We reanalyze it from an algebraic theory perspective.

Read more

5/15/2024