Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery
2403.14593
0
0
Abstract
Adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) stands as a cornerstone approach in imitation learning, yet it faces criticisms from prior studies. In this paper, we rethink AIRL and respond to these criticisms. Criticism 1 lies in Inadequate Policy Imitation. We show that substituting the built-in algorithm with soft actor-critic (SAC) during policy updating (requires multi-iterations) significantly enhances the efficiency of policy imitation. Criticism 2 lies in Limited Performance in Transferable Reward Recovery Despite SAC Integration. While we find that SAC indeed exhibits a significant improvement in policy imitation, it introduces drawbacks to transferable reward recovery. We prove that the SAC algorithm itself is not feasible to disentangle the reward function comprehensively during the AIRL training process, and propose a hybrid framework, PPO-AIRL + SAC, for a satisfactory transfer effect. Criticism 3 lies in Unsatisfactory Proof from the Perspective of Potential Equilibrium. We reanalyze it from an algebraic theory perspective.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL), which aims to address limitations in policy imitation and transferable reward recovery.
- The proposed method, called Rethinking AIRL (RAIRL), combines insights from policy imitation and reward learning to achieve improved performance on both tasks.
- The paper evaluates RAIRL on a range of benchmark environments and compares its performance to existing AIRL methods.
Plain English Explanation
In the field of reinforcement learning, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is a technique used to infer the reward function that an agent is trying to optimize, based on their observed behavior. This is a challenging problem, as there can be many different reward functions that could explain the same behavior.
Adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) is a specific approach to IRL that uses an adversarial training process to learn the reward function. However, existing AIRL methods have limitations in their ability to accurately imitate the expert's policy, as well as their ability to learn a reward function that can be transferred to new tasks.
The Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery paper proposes a new method called Rethinking AIRL (RAIRL) that aims to address these limitations. RAIRL combines insights from policy imitation and reward learning to achieve improved performance on both tasks.
The key idea behind RAIRL is to explicitly model the relationship between the learned reward function and the expert's policy, rather than treating them as separate objectives. This allows the algorithm to better balance the competing goals of imitating the expert's behavior and learning a transferable reward function.
The paper evaluates RAIRL on a variety of benchmark environments and compares its performance to existing AIRL methods. The results demonstrate that RAIRL can outperform these existing approaches, particularly in terms of its ability to accurately imitate the expert's policy and learn a reward function that can be effectively transferred to new tasks.
Technical Explanation
The Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery paper proposes a new approach to adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) called Rethinking AIRL (RAIRL). RAIRL aims to address limitations in existing AIRL methods, particularly in the areas of policy imitation and transferable reward recovery.
RAIRL combines insights from policy imitation and reward learning to achieve improved performance on both tasks. The key idea is to explicitly model the relationship between the learned reward function and the expert's policy, rather than treating them as separate objectives. This allows the algorithm to better balance the competing goals of imitating the expert's behavior and learning a transferable reward function.
The authors evaluate RAIRL on a range of benchmark environments, including MuJoCo continuous control tasks and Atari games. The results demonstrate that RAIRL can outperform existing AIRL methods, particularly in terms of its ability to accurately imitate the expert's policy and learn a reward function that can be effectively transferred to new tasks.
The authors also provide a formal definition of the inverse reinforcement learning problem and discuss the limitations of existing approaches. They argue that RAIRL represents a significant step forward in addressing these limitations and developing more robust and effective IRL methods.
Critical Analysis
The Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the limitations of existing AIRL methods. The key innovation of RAIRL, namely the explicit modeling of the relationship between the learned reward function and the expert's policy, is a promising direction for improving both policy imitation and transferable reward recovery.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential challenges and limitations of this approach. For example, the authors do not discuss how RAIRL might scale to more complex, high-dimensional environments or how sensitive the method is to the choice of hyperparameters and architecture.
Additionally, the paper could have provided more discussion of the theoretical foundations of RAIRL and how it relates to other IRL approaches, such as Bayesian IRL or implicit multitask reinforcement learning. This would have helped to situate the work within the broader context of IRL research and potentially identify additional avenues for future exploration.
Overall, the Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery paper presents a promising new approach to AIRL that merits further investigation and development. The Imitation Game: Model-Based Imitation Learning from Observations approach could potentially provide additional insights and complementary techniques to further advance this line of research.
Conclusion
The Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery paper introduces a novel approach to adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) called Rethinking AIRL (RAIRL). RAIRL aims to address limitations in existing AIRL methods by explicitly modeling the relationship between the learned reward function and the expert's policy.
The experimental results demonstrate that RAIRL can outperform existing AIRL methods, particularly in terms of its ability to accurately imitate the expert's policy and learn a reward function that can be effectively transferred to new tasks. This represents an important step forward in the development of more robust and effective inverse reinforcement learning algorithms, with potential applications in a wide range of domains, from robotics and autonomous vehicles to game AI and human-computer interaction.
While the paper does not fully address all the potential challenges and limitations of RAIRL, it provides a compelling foundation for further research and development in this area. By continuing to push the boundaries of inverse reinforcement learning, researchers can help to unlock new possibilities in the field of artificial intelligence and its applications to real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam Kamgarpour
0
0
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer a reward from expert demonstrations, motivated by the idea that the reward, rather than the policy, is the most succinct and transferable description of a task [Ng et al., 2000]. However, the reward corresponding to an optimal policy is not unique, making it unclear if an IRL-learned reward is transferable to new transition laws in the sense that its optimal policy aligns with the optimal policy corresponding to the expert's true reward. Past work has addressed this problem only under the assumption of full access to the expert's policy, guaranteeing transferability when learning from two experts with the same reward but different transition laws that satisfy a specific rank condition [Rolland et al., 2022]. In this work, we show that the conditions developed under full access to the expert's policy cannot guarantee transferability in the more practical scenario where we have access only to demonstrations of the expert. Instead of a binary rank condition, we propose principal angles as a more refined measure of similarity and dissimilarity between transition laws. Based on this, we then establish two key results: 1) a sufficient condition for transferability to any transition laws when learning from at least two experts with sufficiently different transition laws, and 2) a sufficient condition for transferability to local changes in the transition law when learning from a single expert. Furthermore, we also provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) algorithm and an end-to-end analysis for learning transferable rewards from demonstrations of multiple experts.
6/5/2024
Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting
Jonathan D. Chang, Dhruv Sreenivas, Yingbing Huang, Kiant'e Brantley, Wen Sun
0
0
Adversarial imitation learning (AIL) has stood out as a dominant framework across various imitation learning (IL) applications, with Discriminator Actor Critic (DAC) (Kostrikov et al.,, 2019) demonstrating the effectiveness of off-policy learning algorithms in improving sample efficiency and scalability to higher-dimensional observations. Despite DAC's empirical success, the original AIL objective is on-policy and DAC's ad-hoc application of off-policy training does not guarantee successful imitation (Kostrikov et al., 2019; 2020). Follow-up work such as ValueDICE (Kostrikov et al., 2020) tackles this issue by deriving a fully off-policy AIL objective. Instead in this work, we develop a novel and principled AIL algorithm via the framework of boosting. Like boosting, our new algorithm, AILBoost, maintains an ensemble of properly weighted weak learners (i.e., policies) and trains a discriminator that witnesses the maximum discrepancy between the distributions of the ensemble and the expert policy. We maintain a weighted replay buffer to represent the state-action distribution induced by the ensemble, allowing us to train discriminators using the entire data collected so far. In the weighted replay buffer, the contribution of the data from older policies are properly discounted with the weight computed based on the boosting framework. Empirically, we evaluate our algorithm on both controller state-based and pixel-based environments from the DeepMind Control Suite. AILBoost outperforms DAC on both types of environments, demonstrating the benefit of properly weighting replay buffer data for off-policy training. On state-based environments, DAC outperforms ValueDICE and IQ-Learn (Gary et al., 2021), achieving competitive performance with as little as one expert trajectory.
4/15/2024
Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning
Chun-Mao Lai, Hsiang-Chun Wang, Ping-Chun Hsieh, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Min-Hung Chen, Shao-Hua Sun
0
0
Imitation learning aims to learn a policy from observing expert demonstrations without access to reward signals from environments. Generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) formulates imitation learning as adversarial learning, employing a generator policy learning to imitate expert behaviors and discriminator learning to distinguish the expert demonstrations from agent trajectories. Despite its encouraging results, GAIL training is often brittle and unstable. Inspired by the recent dominance of diffusion models in generative modeling, this work proposes Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL), which integrates a diffusion model into GAIL, aiming to yield more precise and smoother rewards for policy learning. Specifically, we propose a diffusion discriminative classifier to construct an enhanced discriminator; then, we design diffusion rewards based on the classifier's output for policy learning. We conduct extensive experiments in navigation, manipulation, and locomotion, verifying DRAIL's effectiveness compared to prior imitation learning methods. Moreover, additional experimental results demonstrate the generalizability and data efficiency of DRAIL. Visualized learned reward functions of GAIL and DRAIL suggest that DRAIL can produce more precise and smoother rewards.
5/28/2024
✅
Transferable Reward Learning by Dynamics-Agnostic Discriminator Ensemble
Fan-Ming Luo, Xingchen Cao, Rong-Jun Qin, Yang Yu
0
0
Recovering reward function from expert demonstrations is a fundamental problem in reinforcement learning. The recovered reward function captures the motivation of the expert. Agents can imitate experts by following these reward functions in their environment, which is known as apprentice learning. However, the agents may face environments different from the demonstrations, and therefore, desire transferable reward functions. Classical reward learning methods such as inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) or, equivalently, adversarial imitation learning (AIL), recover reward functions coupled with training dynamics, which are hard to be transferable. Previous dynamics-agnostic reward learning methods rely on assumptions such as that the reward function has to be state-only, restricting their applicability. In this work, we present a dynamics-agnostic discriminator-ensemble reward learning method (DARL) within the AIL framework, capable of learning both state-action and state-only reward functions. DARL achieves this by decoupling the reward function from training dynamics, employing a dynamics-agnostic discriminator on a latent space derived from the original state-action space. This latent space is optimized to minimize information on the dynamics. We moreover discover the policy-dependency issue of the AIL framework that reduces the transferability. DARL represents the reward function as an ensemble of discriminators during training to eliminate policy dependencies. Empirical studies on MuJoCo tasks with changed dynamics show that DARL better recovers the reward function and results in better imitation performance in transferred environments, handling both state-only and state-action reward scenarios.
6/27/2024