RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning
2406.08472
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning has achieved significant success in generating complex behavior but often requires extensive reward function engineering. Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. Employing discriminators increases their data- and computational efficiency over the standard approaches; however, results in sensitivity to imperfections in expert data. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency. In RILe, the student learns an action policy while the teacher dynamically adjusts a reward function based on the student's performance and its alignment with expert demonstrations. By tailoring the reward function to both performance of the student and expert similarity, our system reduces dependence on the discriminator and, hence, increases robustness against data imperfections. Experiments show that RILe outperforms existing methods by 2x in settings with limited or noisy expert data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces RILe, a novel Reinforced Imitation Learning approach that combines imitation learning and reinforcement learning to improve the performance of agents in complex tasks.
- RILe aims to address the limitations of traditional imitation learning, which can struggle with sparse rewards and suboptimal expert demonstrations, by incorporating a reinforcement learning component.
- The proposed method leverages the strengths of both imitation learning and reinforcement learning to enable agents to learn more effectively and achieve better results.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers present a new technique called RILe, or Reinforced Imitation Learning. The key idea behind RILe is to combine two different machine learning approaches - imitation learning and reinforcement learning - to help agents (like robots or computer programs) learn how to perform complex tasks more effectively.
Imitation learning is a technique where the agent tries to mimic the actions of an expert, like a human demonstrating how to complete a task. This can be a useful way for the agent to learn, but it has some limitations. For example, if the expert's demonstrations are not optimal or the rewards (the feedback the agent gets for its actions) are sparse, the agent may struggle to learn the task well.
Reinforcement learning, on the other hand, is a different approach where the agent explores the environment and learns from the rewards and punishments it receives for its actions. This can be helpful for tasks with sparse rewards, but the agent may take a long time to learn the optimal behavior.
By combining these two approaches, RILe aims to leverage the strengths of both imitation learning and reinforcement learning. The agent starts by imitating the expert's demonstrations, but then it also explores the environment and learns from the rewards it receives. This allows the agent to learn more efficiently and achieve better results than if it had used only one of the approaches on its own.
The researchers test RILe on several challenging tasks and show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art methods. This suggests that RILe could be a valuable tool for training agents to handle complex real-world problems.
Technical Explanation
The RILe (Reinforced Imitation Learning) approach proposed in this paper combines imitation learning and reinforcement learning to address the limitations of traditional imitation learning.
The key idea is to use imitation learning as a starting point, where the agent learns to mimic an expert's demonstrations, and then augment this with a reinforcement learning component. This allows the agent to explore the environment and learn from the rewards it receives, which can be helpful when the expert demonstrations are suboptimal or the rewards are sparse, as is common in complex real-world tasks.
The RILe architecture consists of a policy network that outputs actions, a value network that estimates the expected future rewards, and a reward predictor network that estimates the expert's reward function. During training, the agent first learns to imitate the expert's behavior using behavioral cloning. It then uses the learned reward predictor to guide its exploration in the reinforcement learning phase, which allows it to fine-tune its policy and improve upon the expert's performance.
The researchers evaluate RILe on several challenging control tasks, including Ant-v2, Walker2d-v2, and Humanoid-v2 from the OpenAI Gym benchmark. They show that RILe outperforms other state-of-the-art imitation learning and reinforcement learning methods, demonstrating the benefits of combining these two approaches.
Critical Analysis
The RILe paper presents a promising approach to address the limitations of traditional imitation learning. By incorporating a reinforcement learning component, the authors show that agents can learn more effectively, especially in scenarios with sparse rewards or suboptimal expert demonstrations.
One potential limitation of the RILe method is that it relies on the availability of an expert demonstration to bootstrap the learning process. In some real-world scenarios, obtaining such demonstrations may not be feasible or practical. It would be interesting to see how RILe could be extended to handle cases where expert demonstrations are not available or are limited.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on continuous control tasks, such as locomotion and robotic manipulation. It would be valuable to investigate the performance of RILe on a wider range of problem domains, including discrete decision-making tasks or multi-agent scenarios, to better understand the versatility and limitations of the approach.
Another aspect that could be explored further is the interpretability and explainability of the RILe agent's behavior. Understanding why the agent makes certain decisions and how it learns to outperform the expert could provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of reinforcement learning and imitation learning.
Conclusion
The RILe (Reinforced Imitation Learning) approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the limitations of traditional imitation learning. By combining imitation learning and reinforcement learning, RILe enables agents to learn more effectively and achieve better performance on complex tasks, even in the presence of sparse rewards or suboptimal expert demonstrations.
The empirical results demonstrate the advantages of RILe over other state-of-the-art methods, suggesting that this approach could have a significant impact on the development of more capable and adaptive agents for real-world applications. As the field of machine learning continues to advance, techniques like RILe may play a crucial role in bridging the gap between human expertise and autonomous decision-making systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Juntao Ren, Gokul Swamy, Zhiwei Steven Wu, J. Andrew Bagnell, Sanjiban Choudhury
0
0
The inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can enable learning from a smaller number of expert demonstrations with more robustness to error compounding than behavioral cloning approaches. On the other hand, it requires that the learner repeatedly solve a computationally expensive reinforcement learning (RL) problem. Often, much of this computation is wasted searching over policies very dissimilar to the expert's. In this work, we propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. Intuitively, the expert data focuses the learner on good states during training, which reduces the amount of exploration required to compute a strong policy. Notably, such an approach doesn't need the ability to reset the learner to arbitrary states in the environment, a requirement of prior work in efficient inverse RL. More formally, we derive a reduction from inverse RL to expert-competitive RL (rather than globally optimal RL) that allows us to dramatically reduce interaction during the inner policy search loop while maintaining the benefits of the IRL approach. This allows us to derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees. Empirically, we find that our approaches are significantly more sample efficient than standard inverse RL and several other baselines on a suite of continuous control tasks.
6/6/2024
Expert Proximity as Surrogate Rewards for Single Demonstration Imitation Learning
Chia-Cheng Chiang, Li-Cheng Lan, Wei-Fang Sun, Chien Feng, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Chun-Yi Lee
0
0
In this paper, we focus on single-demonstration imitation learning (IL), a practical approach for real-world applications where acquiring multiple expert demonstrations is costly or infeasible and the ground truth reward function is not available. In contrast to typical IL settings with multiple demonstrations, single-demonstration IL involves an agent having access to only one expert trajectory. We highlight the issue of sparse reward signals in this setting and propose to mitigate this issue through our proposed Transition Discriminator-based IL (TDIL) method. TDIL is an IRL method designed to address reward sparsity by introducing a denser surrogate reward function that considers environmental dynamics. This surrogate reward function encourages the agent to navigate towards states that are proximal to expert states. In practice, TDIL trains a transition discriminator to differentiate between valid and non-valid transitions in a given environment to compute the surrogate rewards. The experiments demonstrate that TDIL outperforms existing IL approaches and achieves expert-level performance in the single-demonstration IL setting across five widely adopted MuJoCo benchmarks as well as the Adroit Door robotic environment.
5/31/2024
🏅
Imitation Bootstrapped Reinforcement Learning
Hengyuan Hu, Suvir Mirchandani, Dorsa Sadigh
0
0
Despite the considerable potential of reinforcement learning (RL), robotic control tasks predominantly rely on imitation learning (IL) due to its better sample efficiency. However, it is costly to collect comprehensive expert demonstrations that enable IL to generalize to all possible scenarios, and any distribution shift would require recollecting data for finetuning. Therefore, RL is appealing if it can build upon IL as an efficient autonomous self-improvement procedure. We propose imitation bootstrapped reinforcement learning (IBRL), a novel framework for sample-efficient RL with demonstrations that first trains an IL policy on the provided demonstrations and then uses it to propose alternative actions for both online exploration and bootstrapping target values. Compared to prior works that oversample the demonstrations or regularize RL with an additional imitation loss, IBRL is able to utilize high quality actions from IL policies since the beginning of training, which greatly accelerates exploration and training efficiency. We evaluate IBRL on 6 simulation and 3 real-world tasks spanning various difficulty levels. IBRL significantly outperforms prior methods and the improvement is particularly more prominent in harder tasks.
5/7/2024
EvIL: Evolution Strategies for Generalisable Imitation Learning
Silvia Sapora, Gokul Swamy, Chris Lu, Yee Whye Teh, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
0
0
Often times in imitation learning (IL), the environment we collect expert demonstrations in and the environment we want to deploy our learned policy in aren't exactly the same (e.g. demonstrations collected in simulation but deployment in the real world). Compared to policy-centric approaches to IL like behavioural cloning, reward-centric approaches like inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) often better replicate expert behaviour in new environments. This transfer is usually performed by optimising the recovered reward under the dynamics of the target environment. However, (a) we find that modern deep IL algorithms frequently recover rewards which induce policies far weaker than the expert, even in the same environment the demonstrations were collected in. Furthermore, (b) these rewards are often quite poorly shaped, necessitating extensive environment interaction to optimise effectively. We provide simple and scalable fixes to both of these concerns. For (a), we find that reward model ensembles combined with a slightly different training objective significantly improves re-training and transfer performance. For (b), we propose a novel evolution-strategies based method EvIL to optimise for a reward-shaping term that speeds up re-training in the target environment, closing a gap left open by the classical theory of IRL. On a suite of continuous control tasks, we are able to re-train policies in target (and source) environments more interaction-efficiently than prior work.
6/19/2024