Digital Transformation of Education, Systems Approach and Applied Research

Read original: arXiv:2406.11861 - Published 6/19/2024 by Elie Allouche
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a systemic model of digital education as part of research applied to public policy, specifically for the French Ministry of Education.
  • It highlights the importance of a complex approach to understanding the transformation of practices in the digital domain.
  • The paper presents "digital theme groups" (GTnum) as an applied research modality, using a methodological approach that combines a reflexive posture, conceptual choices centered on digital humanities and systems thinking, participatory research, and open science.
  • The modeling is centered on a "digital environment" and six units of action, which are tested through the GTnum themes.
  • The results are interpreted through comparisons with other systemic frameworks, an application to digital transformation axes in academies, and a prospective reflection on the development of generative AI and participatory research.

Plain English Explanation

This paper looks at how digital technology is changing education in France. It proposes building a comprehensive model to understand this transformation, recognizing that digital technology is pervasive and complex.

The researchers used a participatory approach called "digital theme groups" (GTnum) to study this. They combined different research methods, including reflecting on past work, using concepts from digital humanities and systems theory, and involving the public through open science.

The model they developed focuses on a "digital environment" and six key areas of action. The researchers then tested this model by applying it to different aspects of digital transformation in the education system.

They compared their model to other systemic frameworks, looked at how it applies to specific education policies, and considered how emerging technologies like generative AI might impact their findings. The paper also discusses the challenges and potential benefits of this approach, such as the varying understandings of the issues and the opportunities to anticipate new digital configurations with AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a systemic model of digital education as part of research applied to public policy, specifically for the French Ministry of Education. It recognizes the pervasive and complex nature of the digital domain and the importance of a holistic approach to understanding the transformation of practices.

The researchers used "digital theme groups" (GTnum) as an applied research modality, combining a reflexive posture informed by past research contributions, conceptual choices centered on digital humanities and systems theory, participatory research, and open science through the Hypotheses "Education, digital and research" notebook.

The modeling is centered on a "digital environment" and six units of action, which are tested through the GTnum themes. The results are interpreted through comparisons with other systemic frameworks, an application to the axes of digital transformation in academies, and a prospective reflection on the development of generative AI and participatory research.

The paper discusses the limits and contributions of this approach, including the variability in understanding the issues at stake and the integration of research contributions, as well as the avenues for anticipating a new digital configuration with the place of generative AI.

Critical Analysis

The paper recognizes the complexities involved in understanding the digital transformation of education and proposes a systemic model to address this challenge. The use of a participatory approach, combining various research methods and perspectives, is a strength of the study.

However, the paper acknowledges the variability in understanding the issues and integrating research contributions, which could be a limitation of the model. It would be valuable to explore these differences in understanding and how they might impact the development and application of the model.

Additionally, the prospective reflection on the role of generative AI in shaping the digital configuration of education is an important consideration, but the paper could delve deeper into the potential implications and challenges of this emerging technology.

Further research could also investigate the feasibility and scalability of the GTnum approach, as well as its transferability to other educational contexts beyond the French system.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive and innovative approach to modeling the digital transformation of education, recognizing the complexity of the digital domain and the need for a systemic perspective. The use of participatory research methods and the integration of various conceptual frameworks are key strengths of the proposed model.

While the paper acknowledges some limitations, it also highlights the potential for this approach to anticipate and adapt to the changing digital landscape, including the emerging influence of generative AI in education. As digital technologies continue to permeate all aspects of our lives, this type of systemic understanding will be increasingly important for informing public policy and shaping the future of education.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Digital Transformation of Education, Systems Approach and Applied Research

Elie Allouche

This article proposes the construction of a systemic model of digital education as part of research applied to public policy (French Ministry of Education). Considering the digital domain in its pervasiveness, it highlights the importance of a complex approach to understanding the transformation of practices. As an applied research modality, we present digital theme groups (GTnum). The methodological approach combines a reflexive posture informed by research contributions, conceptual choices centered on digital humanities and the systems approach, participatory research and open science via the Hypotheses ''Education, digital and research'' notebook. As a result, our modeling is centered on a ''digital environment'' and six units of action put to the test via the GTnum themes. We interpret these results through a comparison with other systemic frameworks, an application to the axes of digital transformation in academies, a prospective reflection with the development of generative AI and perspectives for participatory research. Finally, the article discusses the limits and contributions of this approach: variability in the understanding of the issues at stake and in the integration of research contributions, as well as avenues for anticipating a new digital configuration with the place of AI.

Read more

6/19/2024

On Future Power Systems Digital Twins: Towards a Standard Architecture
Total Score

0

On Future Power Systems Digital Twins: Towards a Standard Architecture

Wouter Zomerdijk, Peter Palensky, Tarek AlSkaif, Pedro P. Vergara

The energy sector's digital transformation brings mutually dependent communication and energy infrastructure, tightening the relationship between the physical and the digital world. Digital twins (DT) are the key concept for this. This paper initially discusses the evolution of the DT concept across various engineering applications before narrowing its focus to the power systems domain. By reviewing different definitions and applications, we present a new definition of DTs specifically tailored to power systems. Based on the proposed definition and extensive deliberations and consultations with distribution system operators, energy traders, and municipalities, we introduce a standard DT ecosystem architecture that offers services beyond real-time updates and can seamlessly integrate with existing transmission and distribution system operators' processes, while reconciling with concepts such as microgrids and local energy communities based on a system-of-systems view. We also discuss the integration of power system DTs into various phases of the system's life cycle, such as long-term planning, emphasizing challenges that remain to be addressed, such as managing measurement and model errors, and uncertainty propagation. Finally, we present our vision of how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can enhance several power system DT modules established in the proposed architecture.

Read more

4/4/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT)

Aashish Ghimire, John Edwards

The burgeoning development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) in educational settings have sparked considerable debate regarding their efficacy and acceptability.Despite the potential benefits, the assimilation of these cutting-edge technologies among educators exhibits a broad spectrum of attitudes, from enthusiastic advocacy to profound skepticism.This study aims to dissect the underlying factors influencing educators' perceptions and acceptance of GenAI and LLMs.We conducted a survey among educators and analyzed the data through the frameworks of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). Our investigation reveals a strong positive correlation between the perceived usefulness of GenAI tools and their acceptance, underscoring the importance of demonstrating tangible benefits to educators. Additionally, the perceived ease of use emerged as a significant factor, though to a lesser extent, influencing acceptance. Our findings also show that the knowledge and acceptance of these tools is not uniform, suggesting that targeted strategies are required to address the specific needs and concerns of each adopter category to facilitate broader integration of AI tools.in education.

Read more

6/26/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

To accept or not to accept? An IRT-TOE Framework to Understand Educators' Resistance to Generative AI in Higher Education

Jan-Erik Kalmus, Anastasija Nikiforova

Since the public release of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), extensive discourse has emerged concerning the potential advantages and challenges of integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into education. In the realm of information systems, research on technology adoption is crucial for understanding the diverse factors influencing the uptake of specific technologies. Theoretical frameworks, refined and validated over decades, serve as guiding tools to elucidate the individual and organizational dynamics, obstacles, and perceptions surrounding technology adoption. However, while several models have been proposed, they often prioritize elucidating the factors that facilitate acceptance over those that impede it, typically focusing on the student perspective and leaving a gap in empirical evidence regarding educators viewpoints. Given the pivotal role educators play in higher education, this study aims to develop a theoretical model to empirically predict the barriers preventing educators from adopting GenAI in their classrooms. Acknowledging the lack of theoretical models tailored to identifying such barriers, our approach is grounded in the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) framework and augmented with constructs from the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework. This model is transformed into a measurement instrument employing a quantitative approach, complemented by a qualitative approach to enrich the analysis and uncover concerns related to GenAI adoption in the higher education domain.

Read more

7/30/2024