To accept or not to accept? An IRT-TOE Framework to Understand Educators' Resistance to Generative AI in Higher Education

Overview

• Examines the potential challenges and opportunities of adopting Generative AI (GenAI) in higher education
• Focuses on understanding the barriers preventing educators from adopting GenAI in their classrooms
• Develops a theoretical model based on Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) and Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework
• Uses a mixed-methods approach, including a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the impact of generative AI on higher education, specifically looking at the challenges educators face in adopting ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies in their classrooms.

The researchers developed a theoretical model to understand the barriers preventing educators from using these AI-powered tools. They based their model on established frameworks like Innovation Resistance Theory and Technology-Organization-Environment theory, which help explain why people and organizations adopt or resist new technologies.

The study used a combination of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gather data from educators. This mixed-methods approach allowed the researchers to not only identify the key barriers to GenAI adoption but also to understand the nuances and concerns educators have about using these AI-based technologies in their teaching.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a theoretical model to predict the barriers preventing educators from adopting Generative AI (GenAI) in their classrooms. Their approach was grounded in the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) framework, which explains the individual and organizational factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of new technologies.

The researchers augmented the IRT framework with constructs from the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, which considers the technological, organizational, and environmental contexts that shape technology adoption. This combined model was transformed into a measurement instrument using a quantitative survey approach.

The study also incorporated a qualitative component, consisting of interviews, to enrich the analysis and uncover deeper insights into educators' concerns and perceptions regarding the adoption of GenAI in higher education. The mixed-methods approach allowed the researchers to develop a comprehensive understanding of the barriers preventing the integration of these AI-driven technologies in classroom settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a robust theoretical foundation for understanding the barriers to GenAI adoption in education, drawing on well-established frameworks like IRT and TOE. However, the researchers acknowledge the lack of existing theoretical models specifically tailored to identifying such barriers in the higher education context.

While the mixed-methods approach offers valuable insights, the study's sample size and geographical focus may limit the generalizability of the findings. Further research could explore the applicability of the proposed model in diverse educational settings and across different cultural contexts.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential positive impacts of ChatGPT and other GenAI tools on teaching and learning, which could provide a more balanced perspective on the integration of these technologies in the classroom.

Conclusion

This study presents a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding the barriers preventing educators from adopting Generative AI (GenAI) technologies in their classrooms. By drawing on established models and incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, the researchers have developed a nuanced understanding of the individual, organizational, and environmental factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of these AI-powered tools.

The findings of this study can inform the development of targeted strategies and policies to address the concerns and perceptions of educators, ultimately facilitating the responsible and effective integration of GenAI in higher education. As the use of generative AI continues to evolve, understanding and overcoming the barriers to adoption will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of these technologies in the classroom.