Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
2405.15065
0
0
Abstract
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to direct preference optimization (DPO) that can handle unobserved preference heterogeneity.
- The proposed method, called Filtered Direct Preference Optimization (FDPO), combines a Bayesian preference learning model with a heterogeneous treatment effects framework to estimate individual-level preferences.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FDPO on several synthetic and real-world decision-making tasks, showing improvements over existing DPO methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to optimize decisions based on people's preferences, even when those preferences are not directly observable. This can be useful in many real-world scenarios, like recommending products or services to customers.
Traditionally, direct preference optimization methods have assumed that everyone has the same preferences. But in reality, people often have different preferences that can't be easily measured. The new Filtered Direct Preference Optimization (FDPO) approach tackles this challenge by combining a Bayesian model to learn individual preferences with a framework to account for differences in how people respond to different options.
The authors test FDPO on both simulated and real-world decision-making problems, and find that it outperforms existing DPO methods. This suggests FDPO could be a valuable tool for optimizing decisions in the face of unobserved preference differences among the people affected by those decisions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel direct preference optimization (DPO) framework called Filtered Direct Preference Optimization (FDPO) that can handle unobserved preference heterogeneity.
FDPO combines a Bayesian preference learning model with a heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) framework to estimate individual-level preferences. The Bayesian model uses observed choices to infer each individual's underlying preferences, while the HTE component accounts for differences in how people respond to different options.
The authors demonstrate FDPO's effectiveness on several synthetic and real-world decision-making tasks, including iterative preference learning from human feedback, fine-tuning language models to capture preferences, and optimizing language model outputs. FDPO is shown to outperform existing DPO methods, particularly in settings with significant unobserved preference heterogeneity.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to addressing the challenge of unobserved preference heterogeneity in direct preference optimization. By integrating Bayesian preference learning and heterogeneous treatment effects, FDPO offers a principled way to capture individual-level preferences even when they cannot be directly observed.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on simulation studies and relatively small-scale real-world datasets. While the authors demonstrate FDPO's effectiveness in these settings, further validation on larger and more diverse real-world problems would strengthen the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the potential robustness of FDPO to noisy or adversarial inputs, which is an important consideration for real-world deployment. Investigating the method's provable robustness could be a valuable area for future research.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel direct preference optimization framework, Filtered Direct Preference Optimization (FDPO), that can effectively handle unobserved preference heterogeneity. By combining Bayesian preference learning and heterogeneous treatment effects, FDPO demonstrates improved performance over existing DPO methods across a range of decision-making tasks.
The proposed approach has the potential to significantly advance the field of preference-based optimization, enabling more accurate and personalized decision-making in applications where individual preferences are not directly observable. As the authors note, further research is needed to validate FDPO's performance at scale and explore its robustness properties, but this work represents an important step forward in addressing a key challenge in preference modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Jiajing Xu
0
0
For aligning large language models (LLMs), prior work has leveraged reinforcement learning via human feedback (RLHF) or variations of direct preference optimization (DPO). While DPO offers a simpler framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, it compromises on the ability to tune language models to easily maximize non-differentiable and non-binary objectives according to the LLM designer's preferences (e.g., using simpler language or minimizing specific kinds of harmful content). These may neither align with user preferences nor even be able to be captured tractably by binary preference data. To leverage the simplicity and performance of DPO with the generalizability of RL, we propose a hybrid approach between DPO and RLHF. With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards using offline RL. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives, while preserving alignment performance across a range of challenging benchmarks and model sizes.
5/31/2024
๐
Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences
Andi Nika, Debmalya Mandal, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Georgios Tzannetos, Goran Radanovi'c, Adish Singla
0
0
In this paper, we take a step towards a deeper understanding of learning from human preferences by systematically comparing the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) with the recently proposed paradigm of direct preference optimization (DPO). We focus our attention on the class of loglinear policy parametrization and linear reward functions. In order to compare the two paradigms, we first derive minimax statistical bounds on the suboptimality gap induced by both RLHF and DPO, assuming access to an oracle that exactly solves the optimization problems. We provide a detailed discussion on the relative comparison between the two paradigms, simultaneously taking into account the sample size, policy and reward class dimensions, and the regularization temperature. Moreover, we extend our analysis to the approximate optimization setting and derive exponentially decaying convergence rates for both RLHF and DPO. Next, we analyze the setting where the ground-truth reward is not realizable and find that, while RLHF incurs a constant additional error, DPO retains its asymptotically decaying gap by just tuning the temperature accordingly. Finally, we extend our comparison to the Markov decision process setting, where we generalize our results with exact optimization. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to provide such a comparative analysis for RLHF and DPO.
6/6/2024
Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation
Adam Fisch, Jacob Eisenstein, Vicky Zayats, Alekh Agarwal, Ahmad Beirami, Chirag Nagpal, Pete Shaw, Jonathan Berant
0
0
Language model (LM) post-training (or alignment) involves maximizing a reward function that is derived from preference annotations. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a popular offline alignment method that trains a policy directly on preference data without the need to train a reward model or apply reinforcement learning. However, typical preference datasets have only a single, or at most a few, annotation per preference pair, which causes DPO to overconfidently assign rewards that trend towards infinite magnitude. This frequently leads to degenerate policies, sometimes causing even the probabilities of the preferred generations to go to zero. In this work, we analyze this phenomenon and propose distillation to get a better proxy for the true preference distribution over generation pairs: we train the LM to produce probabilities that match the distribution induced by a reward model trained on the preference data. Moreover, to account for uncertainty in the reward model we are distilling from, we optimize against a family of reward models that, as a whole, is likely to include at least one reasonable proxy for the preference distribution. Our results show that distilling from such a family of reward models leads to improved robustness to distribution shift in preference annotations, while preserving the simple supervised nature of DPO.
5/30/2024
๐งช
Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF
Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset, Ahmed Awadallah, Alexander Rakhlin
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We consider online exploration in RLHF, which exploits interactive access to human or AI feedback by deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, maximally informative responses. By allowing RLHF to confidently stray from the pre-trained model, online exploration offers the possibility of novel, potentially super-human capabilities, but its full potential as a paradigm for language model training has yet to be realized, owing to computational and statistical bottlenecks in directly adapting existing reinforcement learning techniques. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO), which is simple and practical -- a one-line change to (online) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023) -- yet enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance. XPO augments the DPO objective with a novel and principled exploration bonus, empowering the algorithm to explore outside the support of the initial model and human feedback data. In theory, we show that XPO is provably sample-efficient and converges to a near-optimal language model policy under natural exploration conditions, irrespective of whether the initial model has good coverage. Our analysis, which builds on the observation that DPO implicitly performs a form of $Q^{star}$-approximation (or, Bellman error minimization), combines previously disparate techniques from language modeling and theoretical reinforcement learning in a serendipitous fashion through the perspective of KL-regularized Markov decision processes. Empirically, we find that XPO is more sample-efficient than non-exploratory DPO variants in a preliminary evaluation.
6/3/2024