Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called "Hybrid Preference Optimization" that combines direct preference optimization with auxiliary objectives to improve the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with user preferences.
- The proposed method aims to address the challenges of direct preference optimization and relative preference optimization by incorporating additional objectives that guide the model towards desirable behaviors.
- The paper explores various auxiliary objectives, such as maintaining text quality, avoiding unsafe content, and promoting ethical and prosocial responses, and demonstrates how these can be effectively integrated into the optimization process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to train large language models (LLMs) to better align with user preferences. The key idea is to not only optimize the model directly for user preferences, but to also include other objectives that encourage the model to behave in desirable ways.
For example, the model might be trained not only to generate text that users prefer, but also to maintain a high level of text quality, avoid unsafe or inappropriate content, and promote ethical and socially beneficial responses. The researchers call this "Hybrid Preference Optimization" because it combines the direct optimization of user preferences with these additional, auxiliary objectives.
The motivation behind this approach is to address some of the challenges that have been identified with other preference optimization methods, such as direct preference optimization and relative preference optimization. By incorporating these extra objectives, the researchers hope to develop LLMs that are not only well-aligned with user preferences, but also maintain other desirable properties that are important for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by acknowledging the limitations of existing preference optimization approaches, such as direct preference optimization and relative preference optimization. These methods focus solely on optimizing the model's outputs to match user preferences, without considering other important factors like text quality, safety, and ethics.
To address these issues, the authors propose a "Hybrid Preference Optimization" approach that combines direct preference optimization with auxiliary objectives. These auxiliary objectives can include maintaining a high level of text quality, avoiding the generation of unsafe or inappropriate content, and promoting ethical and prosocial responses.
The researchers explore different ways of integrating these auxiliary objectives into the optimization process, such as using multi-task learning or hierarchical optimization. They also investigate the impact of various weighting schemes for balancing the different objectives.
Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, the authors demonstrate that the Hybrid Preference Optimization approach can lead to significant improvements in the alignment of LLMs with user preferences, while also preserving desirable model properties like text quality and safety. The paper also discusses potential limitations and areas for future research, such as the challenge of accurately measuring and quantifying some of the auxiliary objectives.
Critical Analysis
The Hybrid Preference Optimization approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards developing more robust and reliable large language models (LLMs) that are well-aligned with user preferences. By incorporating auxiliary objectives beyond just direct preference optimization, the authors have addressed an important limitation of existing approaches.
One potential concern is the challenge of accurately measuring and quantifying some of the auxiliary objectives, such as text quality, safety, and ethical behavior. The paper acknowledges this issue and suggests that further research is needed to develop more reliable and comprehensive evaluation metrics in these areas.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs or tensions that may arise between the different objectives. For example, optimizing for user preferences may sometimes conflict with maintaining high text quality or avoiding unsafe content. The authors could have delved deeper into how to effectively balance these competing objectives and the implications of prioritizing one over another.
Furthermore, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the Hybrid Preference Optimization approach, without much discussion of the broader societal implications. As LLMs become more widely deployed, it will be crucial to consider the ethical and social consequences of these systems, particularly when they are being optimized for user preferences.
Overall, the Hybrid Preference Optimization approach represents an important step forward in the field of preference alignment for large language models. However, further research is needed to address the challenges and limitations identified in this paper, as well as to explore the broader implications of this technology for society.
Conclusion
The key contribution of this paper is the introduction of a novel "Hybrid Preference Optimization" approach that combines direct preference optimization with auxiliary objectives to improve the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with user preferences. By incorporating objectives related to text quality, safety, and ethical behavior, the authors have addressed a significant limitation of existing preference optimization methods.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through extensive experiments, showing that Hybrid Preference Optimization can lead to LLMs that are better aligned with user preferences while also maintaining desirable model properties. This work represents an important step forward in the field of preference alignment and opens up new avenues for research and development in this area.
As LLMs become increasingly prevalent in various applications, the ability to ensure their alignment with user preferences, as well as their safety, quality, and ethical behavior, will be crucial. The Hybrid Preference Optimization approach outlined in this paper provides a promising framework for addressing these challenges and paves the way for the development of more robust and reliable large language models that can be deployed with confidence in real-world settings.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Jiajing Xu
For aligning large language models (LLMs), prior work has leveraged reinforcement learning via human feedback (RLHF) or variations of direct preference optimization (DPO). While DPO offers a simpler framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, it compromises on the ability to tune language models to easily maximize non-differentiable and non-binary objectives according to the LLM designer's preferences (e.g., using simpler language or minimizing specific kinds of harmful content). These may neither align with user preferences nor even be able to be captured tractably by binary preference data. To leverage the simplicity and performance of DPO with the generalizability of RL, we propose a hybrid approach between DPO and RLHF. With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards using offline RL. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives, while preserving alignment performance across a range of challenging benchmarks and model sizes.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
Read more5/27/2024
💬
4
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Stefano Ermon, Christopher D. Manning, Chelsea Finn
While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper we introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form, allowing us to solve the standard RLHF problem with only a simple classification loss. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for sampling from the LM during fine-tuning or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds PPO-based RLHF in ability to control sentiment of generations, and matches or improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.
Read more7/31/2024
🛠️
0
Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization
Zhanhui Zhou, Jie Liu, Jing Shao, Xiangyu Yue, Chao Yang, Wanli Ouyang, Yu Qiao
A single language model, even when aligned with labelers through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), may not suit all human preferences. Recent approaches therefore prefer customization, gathering multi-dimensional feedback, and creating distinct reward models for each dimension. Different language models are then optimized for various preferences using multi-objective RLHF (MORLHF) with varying reward weights. However, RL fine-tuning is unstable and resource-heavy, especially with diverse and usually conflicting objectives. In this paper, we present Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (MODPO), an RL-free extension of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) for multiple alignment objectives. Essentially, MODPO folds language modeling directly into reward modeling, training language models as implicit collective reward models that combine all objectives with specific weights. MODPO theoretically yields the same optimal solutions as MORLHF but is practically more stable and efficient. Empirical results in safety alignment and long-form question answering show that MODPO matches or outperforms existing methods, producing a Pareto front of language models catering to diverse preferences with three times less computational resources compared to MORLHF. Code is available at https://github.com/ZHZisZZ/modpo.
Read more8/20/2024