Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks

Read original: arXiv:2408.16757 - Published 9/2/2024 by Hongjun Wang, Sagar Vaze, Kai Han
Total Score

0

Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a critical analysis of methods and benchmarks for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and open-set recognition.
  • The authors dissect key challenges and pitfalls in existing approaches, and propose ways to improve evaluation and testing.
  • The paper covers related work, technical details, critical analysis, and conclusions regarding this important area of machine learning research.

Plain English Explanation

When a machine learning model is deployed in the real world, it may encounter data that is very different from what it was trained on. This is known as out-of-distribution (OOD) data. For example, an image classification model trained on photos of dogs and cats may see a completely new type of object, like a car, during deployment.

OOD detection is the task of identifying when the model is seeing this unfamiliar data, so it can avoid making unreliable predictions. Open-set recognition is the related problem of classifying the new, unknown data into appropriate categories.

This paper takes a deep dive into the challenges involved in building effective OOD detection and open-set recognition systems. The authors analyze the shortcomings of existing methods and propose ways to improve how these capabilities are evaluated.

They argue that current benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics do not fully capture the complexities of real-world OOD scenarios. The authors suggest ways to create more realistic and comprehensive test cases to better assess the robustness of these models.

Overall, the paper provides important insights for advancing the state-of-the-art in handling distribution shift - a critical challenge as machine learning systems become more widely deployed.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by reviewing related work on OOD detection and open-set recognition. It highlights key methods like one-class classifiers, energy-based models, and generative adversarial networks that have been applied to these problems.

The authors then delve into the technical details of the approaches. For OOD detection, they discuss how models can learn a distribution of "in-distribution" data and use statistical tests to identify anomalies. For open-set recognition, the paper covers techniques like learning open-set classifiers and leveraging generative models.

A critical part of the work is the authors' analysis of existing benchmarks and evaluation protocols. They argue that many current datasets and metrics do not capture the true complexity of real-world OOD scenarios, such as gradual or adversarial distribution shifts. The paper proposes ways to develop more realistic and comprehensive test cases to better assess the capabilities of these models.

Critical Analysis

The authors raise several important caveats and limitations of current OOD detection and open-set recognition approaches:

  • Existing benchmarks often use synthetic or unrealistic OOD data, failing to capture the subtleties of real-world distribution shift.
  • Evaluation metrics like AUROC can be misleading, as they may not align with practical deployment considerations.
  • Many methods make strong assumptions about the nature of the OOD data, which may not hold in practice.
  • There is a lack of standardization in how these problems are defined and tested, making it difficult to compare different approaches.

The paper encourages the research community to think more critically about how these capabilities are developed and evaluated. The authors suggest that pushing towards more realistic and comprehensive testing is crucial for advancing the state-of-the-art and ensuring the robustness of deployed machine learning systems.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable critical analysis of the current state of OOD detection and open-set recognition research. By dissecting the limitations of existing methods and benchmarks, the authors highlight important directions for future work in this area.

Improving the ability of machine learning models to reliably detect and handle out-of-distribution data is a crucial challenge as these systems become more widely deployed. The insights and recommendations in this paper can help guide the research community towards more robust and practical solutions for this problem.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks
Total Score

0

Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks

Hongjun Wang, Sagar Vaze, Kai Han

Detecting test-time distribution shift has emerged as a key capability for safely deployed machine learning models, with the question being tackled under various guises in recent years. In this paper, we aim to provide a consolidated view of the two largest sub-fields within the community: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and open-set recognition (OSR). In particular, we aim to provide rigorous empirical analysis of different methods across settings and provide actionable takeaways for practitioners and researchers. Concretely, we make the following contributions: (i) We perform rigorous cross-evaluation between state-of-the-art methods in the OOD detection and OSR settings and identify a strong correlation between the performances of methods for them; (ii) We propose a new, large-scale benchmark setting which we suggest better disentangles the problem tackled by OOD detection and OSR, re-evaluating state-of-the-art OOD detection and OSR methods in this setting; (iii) We surprisingly find that the best performing method on standard benchmarks (Outlier Exposure) struggles when tested at scale, while scoring rules which are sensitive to the deep feature magnitude consistently show promise; and (iv) We conduct empirical analysis to explain these phenomena and highlight directions for future research. Code: https://github.com/Visual-AI/Dissect-OOD-OSR

Read more

9/2/2024

Rethinking the Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sorites Paradox
Total Score

0

Rethinking the Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sorites Paradox

Xingming Long, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen

Most existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection benchmarks classify samples with novel labels as the OOD data. However, some marginal OOD samples actually have close semantic contents to the in-distribution (ID) sample, which makes determining the OOD sample a Sorites Paradox. In this paper, we construct a benchmark named Incremental Shift OOD (IS-OOD) to address the issue, in which we divide the test samples into subsets with different semantic and covariate shift degrees relative to the ID dataset. The data division is achieved through a shift measuring method based on our proposed Language Aligned Image feature Decomposition (LAID). Moreover, we construct a Synthetic Incremental Shift (Syn-IS) dataset that contains high-quality generated images with more diverse covariate contents to complement the IS-OOD benchmark. We evaluate current OOD detection methods on our benchmark and find several important insights: (1) The performance of most OOD detection methods significantly improves as the semantic shift increases; (2) Some methods like GradNorm may have different OOD detection mechanisms as they rely less on semantic shifts to make decisions; (3) Excessive covariate shifts in the image are also likely to be considered as OOD for some methods. Our code and data are released in https://github.com/qqwsad5/IS-OOD.

Read more

6/17/2024

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

A View on Out-of-Distribution Identification from a Statistical Testing Theory Perspective

Alberto Caron, Chris Hicks, Vasilios Mavroudis

We study the problem of efficiently detecting Out-of-Distribution (OOD) samples at test time in supervised and unsupervised learning contexts. While ML models are typically trained under the assumption that training and test data stem from the same distribution, this is often not the case in realistic settings, thus reliably detecting distribution shifts is crucial at deployment. We re-formulate the OOD problem under the lenses of statistical testing and then discuss conditions that render the OOD problem identifiable in statistical terms. Building on this framework, we study convergence guarantees of an OOD test based on the Wasserstein distance, and provide a simple empirical evaluation.

Read more

5/13/2024

Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey
Total Score

0

Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey

Zesheng Hong, Yubiao Yue, Yubin Chen, Lele Cong, Huanjie Lin, Yuanmei Luo, Mini Han Wang, Weidong Wang, Jialong Xu, Xiaoqi Yang, Hechang Chen, Zhenzhang Li, Sihong Xie

Computer-aided diagnostics has benefited from the development of deep learning-based computer vision techniques in these years. Traditional supervised deep learning methods assume that the test sample is drawn from the identical distribution as the training data. However, it is possible to encounter out-of-distribution samples in real-world clinical scenarios, which may cause silent failure in deep learning-based medical image analysis tasks. Recently, research has explored various out-of-distribution (OOD) detection situations and techniques to enable a trustworthy medical AI system. In this survey, we systematically review the recent advances in OOD detection in medical image analysis. We first explore several factors that may cause a distributional shift when using a deep-learning-based model in clinic scenarios, with three different types of distributional shift well defined on top of these factors. Then a framework is suggested to categorize and feature existing solutions, while the previous studies are reviewed based on the methodology taxonomy. Our discussion also includes evaluation protocols and metrics, as well as the challenge and a research direction lack of exploration.

Read more

7/4/2024