Does Refusal Training in LLMs Generalize to the Past Tense?
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper explores whether the techniques used to train large language models (LLMs) to refuse unsafe or unethical requests, known as "refusal training," can be effectively applied to improve the models' handling of the past tense.
• The researchers investigate whether the benefits of refusal training, such as improved safety and reliability, can be extended to a different linguistic domain - verb conjugation in the past tense.
Plain English Explanation
• Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, they can sometimes produce unsafe or unethical outputs, which has led to the development of "refusal training" techniques to improve the models' reliability and safety.
• The researchers in this paper wanted to see if the same refusal training methods used to make LLMs more cautious about unsafe requests could also help the models handle the past tense of verbs more accurately.
• The past tense can be tricky for language models, as there are many irregular verb forms that don't follow predictable rules. The researchers hypothesized that the discipline and caution instilled by refusal training might also help the models learn the past tense better.
Technical Explanation
• The researchers used a well-known large language model as the basis for their experiments. They first trained the model using standard techniques, then applied additional "refusal training" to make the model more cautious about generating unsafe or unethical outputs.
• To test the model's past tense abilities, the researchers created a dataset of verb conjugation tasks, including both regular and irregular past tense forms. They evaluated the model's performance on this dataset, comparing the results before and after the refusal training.
• The results showed that the refusal training did indeed improve the model's past tense conjugation abilities, particularly for irregular verbs. The researchers believe this is because the refusal training instilled a more careful, disciplined approach in the model, which helped it better handle the complexities of past tense verb forms.
Critical Analysis
• The researchers acknowledge that their study is a relatively small-scale exploration of this topic, and further research would be needed to fully understand the relationship between refusal training and past tense performance.
• One potential limitation is that the dataset used for evaluating past tense abilities was relatively constrained. Larger and more diverse datasets could provide a more comprehensive assessment of the model's capabilities.
• Additionally, the researchers did not explore the potential downsides or unintended consequences of applying refusal training techniques to past tense learning. It's possible that the increased caution could have negative impacts in some areas that were not addressed in this paper.
Conclusion
• This paper presents an intriguing finding that the techniques used to make large language models more cautious and reliable when generating potentially unsafe outputs may also have benefits for improving their handling of the past tense.
• The results suggest that the discipline and care instilled by refusal training can have positive spillover effects in other linguistic domains, potentially making LLMs more robust and capable overall. Further research in this area could yield valuable insights for improving the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
Does Refusal Training in LLMs Generalize to the Past Tense?
Maksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas Flammarion
Refusal training is widely used to prevent LLMs from generating harmful, undesirable, or illegal outputs. We reveal a curious generalization gap in the current refusal training approaches: simply reformulating a harmful request in the past tense (e.g., How to make a Molotov cocktail? to How did people make a Molotov cocktail?) is often sufficient to jailbreak many state-of-the-art LLMs. We systematically evaluate this method on Llama-3 8B, Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Gemma-2 9B, Phi-3-Mini, GPT-4o mini, GPT-4o, and R2D2 models using GPT-3.5 Turbo as a reformulation model. For example, the success rate of this simple attack on GPT-4o increases from 1% using direct requests to 88% using 20 past tense reformulation attempts on harmful requests from JailbreakBench with GPT-4 as a jailbreak judge. Interestingly, we also find that reformulations in the future tense are less effective, suggesting that refusal guardrails tend to consider past historical questions more benign than hypothetical future questions. Moreover, our experiments on fine-tuning GPT-3.5 Turbo show that defending against past reformulations is feasible when past tense examples are explicitly included in the fine-tuning data. Overall, our findings highlight that the widely used alignment techniques -- such as SFT, RLHF, and adversarial training -- employed to align the studied models can be brittle and do not always generalize as intended. We provide code and jailbreak artifacts at https://github.com/tml-epfl/llm-past-tense.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal
Yukai Zhou, Wenjie Wang
Ensuring the safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial to generating responses consistent with human values. Despite their ability to recognize and avoid harmful queries, LLMs are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where carefully crafted prompts elicit them to produce toxic content. One category of jailbreak attacks is reformulating the task as adversarial attacks by eliciting the LLM to generate an affirmative response. However, the typical attack in this category GCG has very limited attack success rate. In this study, to better study the jailbreak attack, we introduce the DSN (Don't Say No) attack, which prompts LLMs to not only generate affirmative responses but also novelly enhance the objective to suppress refusals. In addition, another challenge lies in jailbreak attacks is the evaluation, as it is difficult to directly and accurately assess the harmfulness of the attack. The existing evaluation such as refusal keyword matching has its own limitation as it reveals numerous false positive and false negative instances. To overcome this challenge, we propose an ensemble evaluation pipeline incorporating Natural Language Inference (NLI) contradiction assessment and two external LLM evaluators. Extensive experiments demonstrate the potency of the DSN and the effectiveness of ensemble evaluation compared to baseline methods.
Read more4/26/2024
0
Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training
Youliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Pinjia He, Zhaopeng Tu
This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) by identifying and tackling a refusal position bias within safety tuning data, which compromises the models' ability to appropriately refuse generating unsafe content. We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position, significantly enhancing their safety capabilities. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful response sequence. Our empirical evaluation, conducted using LLaMA3 and Mistral model families across six attack scenarios, demonstrates that our method not only improves model safety without compromising performance but also surpasses well-known models such as GPT-4 in defending against attacks. Importantly, our approach successfully defends recent advanced attack methods (e.g., CodeAttack) that have jailbroken GPT-4 and LLaMA3-70B-Instruct. Our code and data can be found at https://github.com/RobustNLP/DeRTa.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Self and Cross-Model Distillation for LLMs: Effective Methods for Refusal Pattern Alignment
Jie Li, Yi Liu, Chongyang Liu, Xiaoning Ren, Ling Shi, Weisong Sun, Yinxing Xue
Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT series, Anthropic's Claude, and Meta's LLaMa have shown remarkable capabilities in text generation. However, their susceptibility to toxic prompts presents significant security challenges. This paper investigates alignment techniques, including Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), to mitigate these risks. We conduct an empirical study on refusal patterns across nine LLMs, revealing that models with uniform refusal patterns, such as Claude3, exhibit higher security. Based on these findings, we propose self-distilling and cross-model distilling methods to enhance LLM security. Our results show that these methods significantly improve refusal rates and reduce unsafe content, with cross-model distilling achieving refusal rates close to Claude3's 94.51%. These findings underscore the potential of distillation-based alignment in securing LLMs against toxic prompts.
Read more6/18/2024