Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach called Decoupled Refusal Training (DRT) to improve the safety of large language models (LLMs) by training them to refuse unsafe prompts.
- The key idea is to train the LLM to detect and refuse potentially unsafe prompts, while maintaining its overall performance on intended tasks.
- The authors conduct experiments on several LLMs and demonstrate the effectiveness of DRT in improving safety without significantly degrading task performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called Decoupled Refusal Training (DRT) to make large language models (LLMs) safer. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can also produce harmful or undesirable content if prompted incorrectly.
The core idea behind DRT is to train the LLM to recognize and refuse unsafe or inappropriate prompts, while still maintaining its overall capabilities on the tasks it was designed for. This is done by separating the training process into two parts: one for the LLM's main task performance, and another for its ability to detect and refuse unsafe prompts.
By using this decoupled approach, the researchers were able to improve the safety of several different LLMs without significantly impacting their performance on their intended tasks. This is an important step towards making these powerful AI systems more reliable and trustworthy for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose a novel approach called Decoupled Refusal Training (DRT) to enhance the safety of large language models (LLMs) by training them to detect and refuse unsafe prompts.
The key components of DRT are:
- Main Task Training: This trains the LLM on its primary task, such as text generation or question answering, to maintain its overall performance.
- Refusal Training: This trains the LLM to recognize and refuse unsafe prompts, using a separate objective function and training process.
By decoupling the two training processes, the authors show that DRT can improve the LLM's safety without significantly degrading its task performance. They evaluate DRT on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, T5, and InstructGPT, and demonstrate its effectiveness in improving safety while preserving overall model capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to enhancing the safety of LLMs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- Generalizability: The authors only evaluate DRT on a few popular LLMs. Its effectiveness on a wider range of models and domains remains to be seen.
- Prompt Engineering: The authors use a predefined set of "unsafe" prompts for training. In practice, users may come up with novel prompts that the model has not been trained on, which could still lead to undesirable outputs.
- Alignment with User Preferences: The model's refusal decisions may not always align with what individual users consider safe or appropriate. Personalization or user-specific refinement may be necessary.
- Transparency and Interpretability: It's unclear how the model decides which prompts to refuse and why. Improving the transparency and interpretability of these decisions could be beneficial for user trust and acceptance.
Overall, the DRT approach represents an important step towards safer and more trustworthy LLMs, but further research is needed to address these potential limitations and make the technology more robust and user-friendly.
Conclusion
The paper introduces Decoupled Refusal Training (DRT), a novel approach to improving the safety of large language models (LLMs) by training them to detect and refuse unsafe prompts. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DRT in enhancing safety without significantly degrading the models' overall task performance.
This research represents a significant advancement in the field of AI safety, as it addresses a crucial challenge in deploying powerful language models in real-world applications. By equipping LLMs with the ability to recognize and refuse unsafe inputs, the DRT approach can help make these systems more reliable and trustworthy for a wide range of users and use cases.
The paper also highlights the importance of continued research in this area, as there are still several potential limitations and areas for improvement. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for the widespread adoption and responsible use of large language models in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training
Youliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Pinjia He, Zhaopeng Tu
This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) by identifying and tackling a refusal position bias within safety tuning data, which compromises the models' ability to appropriately refuse generating unsafe content. We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position, significantly enhancing their safety capabilities. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful response sequence. Our empirical evaluation, conducted using LLaMA3 and Mistral model families across six attack scenarios, demonstrates that our method not only improves model safety without compromising performance but also surpasses well-known models such as GPT-4 in defending against attacks. Importantly, our approach successfully defends recent advanced attack methods (e.g., CodeAttack) that have jailbroken GPT-4 and LLaMA3-70B-Instruct. Our code and data can be found at https://github.com/RobustNLP/DeRTa.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Refusing Safe Prompts for Multi-modal Large Language Models
Zedian Shao, Hongbin Liu, Yuepeng Hu, Neil Zhenqiang Gong
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have become the cornerstone of today's generative AI ecosystem, sparking intense competition among tech giants and startups. In particular, an MLLM generates a text response given a prompt consisting of an image and a question. While state-of-the-art MLLMs use safety filters and alignment techniques to refuse unsafe prompts, in this work, we introduce MLLM-Refusal, the first method that induces refusals for safe prompts. In particular, our MLLM-Refusal optimizes a nearly-imperceptible refusal perturbation and adds it to an image, causing target MLLMs to likely refuse a safe prompt containing the perturbed image and a safe question. Specifically, we formulate MLLM-Refusal as a constrained optimization problem and propose an algorithm to solve it. Our method offers competitive advantages for MLLM model providers by potentially disrupting user experiences of competing MLLMs, since competing MLLM's users will receive unexpected refusals when they unwittingly use these perturbed images in their prompts. We evaluate MLLM-Refusal on four MLLMs across four datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in causing competing MLLMs to refuse safe prompts while not affecting non-competing MLLMs. Furthermore, we explore three potential countermeasures-adding Gaussian noise, DiffPure, and adversarial training. Our results show that though they can mitigate MLLM-Refusal's effectiveness, they also sacrifice the accuracy and/or efficiency of the competing MLLM. The code is available at https://github.com/Sadcardation/MLLM-Refusal.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Self and Cross-Model Distillation for LLMs: Effective Methods for Refusal Pattern Alignment
Jie Li, Yi Liu, Chongyang Liu, Xiaoning Ren, Ling Shi, Weisong Sun, Yinxing Xue
Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT series, Anthropic's Claude, and Meta's LLaMa have shown remarkable capabilities in text generation. However, their susceptibility to toxic prompts presents significant security challenges. This paper investigates alignment techniques, including Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), to mitigate these risks. We conduct an empirical study on refusal patterns across nine LLMs, revealing that models with uniform refusal patterns, such as Claude3, exhibit higher security. Based on these findings, we propose self-distilling and cross-model distilling methods to enhance LLM security. Our results show that these methods significantly improve refusal rates and reduce unsafe content, with cross-model distilling achieving refusal rates close to Claude3's 94.51%. These findings underscore the potential of distillation-based alignment in securing LLMs against toxic prompts.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation
Haoyu Wang, Bingzhe Wu, Yatao Bian, Yongzhe Chang, Xueqian Wang, Peilin Zhao
Large Language Models (LLMs) are implicit troublemakers. While they provide valuable insights and assist in problem-solving, they can also potentially serve as a resource for malicious activities. Implementing safety alignment could mitigate the risk of LLMs generating harmful responses. We argue that: even when an LLM appears to successfully block harmful queries, there may still be hidden vulnerabilities that could act as ticking time bombs. To identify these underlying weaknesses, we propose to use a cost value model as both a detector and an attacker. Trained on external or self-generated harmful datasets, the cost value model could successfully influence the original safe LLM to output toxic content in decoding process. For instance, LLaMA-2-chat 7B outputs 39.18% concrete toxic content, along with only 22.16% refusals without any harmful suffixes. These potential weaknesses can then be exploited via prompt optimization such as soft prompts on images. We name this decoding strategy: Jailbreak Value Decoding (JVD), emphasizing that seemingly secure LLMs may not be as safe as we initially believe. They could be used to gather harmful data or launch covert attacks.
Read more8/27/2024