$beta$-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic $beta$

Read original: arXiv:2407.08639 - Published 7/12/2024 by Junkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a technique called Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) for training large language models (LLMs) to align with human preferences.
  • DPO's performance is sensitive to the fine-tuning of a trade-off parameter called $beta$ and the quality of the preference data used for training.
  • The authors analyze the impact of $beta$ and data quality on DPO, and introduce a novel framework that dynamically calibrates $beta$ based on data quality considerations.
  • The proposed method also incorporates $beta$-guided data filtering to mitigate the influence of outliers.
  • Empirical evaluations show that the dynamic $beta$ adjustment technique significantly improves DPO's performance across various models and datasets.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can sometimes produce outputs that don't align with human preferences. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a technique that aims to train LLMs to behave more in line with what humans want.

However, the success of DPO depends on carefully tuning a parameter called $beta$, which controls the trade-off between the model's performance on its original task and its alignment with human preferences. The researchers found that the optimal value of $beta$ can vary depending on the quality of the preference data used for training.

To address this issue, the researchers developed a new framework that can dynamically adjust the $beta$ value based on the quality of the data. Their method also includes a step to filter out low-quality data that could negatively impact the model's training.

By testing their approach on various LLMs and datasets, the researchers showed that this dynamic $beta$ adjustment technique significantly improves the performance of DPO, making the training process more robust and adaptable to different scenarios. This helps ensure that LLMs can be reliably aligned with human preferences, which is important for their safe and ethical deployment.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on improving the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) technique for training large language models (LLMs) to adhere to human preferences. DPO involves fine-tuning the model on a dataset of human preferences, expressed as pairwise comparisons between different model outputs.

The researchers found that DPO's performance is highly sensitive to the choice of a trade-off parameter $beta$, which controls the balance between the model's original task performance and its alignment with human preferences. Additionally, the quality of the preference data used for training can significantly impact DPO's effectiveness.

To address these limitations, the authors introduce a novel framework that dynamically adjusts the $beta$ value at the batch level based on considerations of data quality. The method also incorporates $beta$-guided data filtering to safeguard against the influence of outliers or low-quality preference comparisons.

Through extensive empirical evaluations, the researchers demonstrate that their dynamic $beta$ adjustment technique significantly improves DPO's performance across a range of LLM architectures and datasets. This step-wise preference optimization approach offers a more robust and adaptable training paradigm for aligning LLMs with human feedback.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the limitations of static $beta$ values and data quality issues in Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) for training large language models (LLMs). The proposed dynamic $beta$ adjustment and data filtering techniques appear to be effective in improving DPO's performance across various scenarios.

However, the authors acknowledge that their method relies on the availability of high-quality preference data, which may not always be easy to obtain. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or systematic errors that may exist in the preference data, which could influence the model's alignment with human preferences.

Furthermore, the researchers focus on pairwise preference comparisons, but real-world human preferences may be more complex and nuanced, involving various contextual factors. It would be valuable to investigate how the dynamic $beta$ adjustment approach could be extended to handle more diverse forms of human feedback, such as free-form text or multidimensional preferences.

Another area for further research could be the interpretability and transparency of the DPO training process. Understanding how the model's preferences are shaped by the preference data and the dynamic $beta$ adjustment could help build trust and ensure the model's alignment with human values.

Overall, the paper presents a promising step forward in the quest for robust and adaptable techniques for aligning LLMs with human preferences, but there remain opportunities to explore more sophisticated and comprehensive solutions in this important research area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework for improving the performance of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) in training large language models (LLMs) to adhere to human preferences. The key contributions are:

  1. Analysis of the impact of the trade-off parameter $beta$ and data quality on DPO's performance.
  2. Development of a dynamic $beta$ adjustment technique that calibrates the parameter based on data quality considerations.
  3. Incorporation of $beta$-guided data filtering to mitigate the influence of outliers or low-quality preference data.
  4. Empirical demonstration of the significant performance improvements achieved by the proposed method across various LLM models and datasets.

The dynamic $beta$ adjustment and data filtering approach offers a more robust and adaptable training paradigm for aligning LLMs with human feedback, which is crucial for the safe and ethical deployment of these powerful AI systems. The research provides valuable insights and a promising direction for further advancements in the field of preference-based machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

$beta$-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic $beta$

Junkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a compelling approach for training Large Language Models (LLMs) to adhere to human preferences. However, the performance of DPO is sensitive to the fine-tuning of its trade-off parameter $beta$, as well as to the quality of the preference data. We analyze the impact of $beta$ and data quality on DPO, uncovering that optimal $beta$ values vary with the informativeness of pairwise data. Addressing the limitations of static $beta$ values, we introduce a novel framework that dynamically calibrates $beta$ at the batch level, informed by data quality considerations. Additionally, our method incorporates $beta$-guided data filtering to safeguard against the influence of outliers. Through empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that our dynamic $beta$ adjustment technique significantly improves DPO's performance across a range of models and datasets, offering a more robust and adaptable training paradigm for aligning LLMs with human feedback. The code is available at url{https://github.com/junkangwu/beta-DPO}.

Read more

7/12/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization

Junkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Jiawei Chen, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He

This study addresses the challenge of noise in training datasets for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), a method for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences. We categorize noise into pointwise noise, which includes low-quality data points, and pairwise noise, which encompasses erroneous data pair associations that affect preference rankings. Utilizing Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), we enhance DPO's resilience to these types of noise. Our theoretical insights reveal that DPO inherently embeds DRO principles, conferring robustness to pointwise noise, with the regularization coefficient $beta$ playing a critical role in its noise resistance. Extending this framework, we introduce Distributionally Robustifying DPO (Dr. DPO), which integrates pairwise robustness by optimizing against worst-case pairwise scenarios. The novel hyperparameter $beta'$ in Dr. DPO allows for fine-tuned control over data pair reliability, providing a strategic balance between exploration and exploitation in noisy training environments. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that Dr. DPO substantially improves the quality of generated text and response accuracy in preference datasets, showcasing enhanced performance in both noisy and noise-free settings. The code is available at https://github.com/junkangwu/Dr_DPO.

Read more

7/11/2024

Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
Total Score

0

Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness

Shiming Xie, Hong Chen, Fred Yu, Zeye Sun, Xiuyu Wu, Yingfan Hu

Learning from human preference is a paradigm used in large-scale language model (LLM) fine-tuning step to better align pretrained LLM to human preference for downstream task. In the past it uses reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) algorithm to optimize the LLM policy to align with these preferences and not to draft too far from the original model. Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has been proposed to solve the alignment problem with a simplified RL-free method. Using preference pairs of chosen and reject data, DPO models the relative log probability as implicit reward function and optimize LLM policy using a simple binary cross entropy objective directly. DPO is quite straight forward and easy to be understood. It perform efficiently and well in most cases. In this article, we analyze the working mechanism of $beta$ in DPO, disclose its syntax difference between RL algorithm and DPO, and understand the potential shortage brought by the DPO simplification. With these insights, we propose MinorDPO, which is better aligned to the original RL algorithm, and increase the stability of preference optimization process.

Read more

9/2/2024

Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
Total Score

0

Filtered Direct Preference Optimization

Tetsuro Morimura, Mitsuki Sakamoto, Yuu Jinnai, Kenshi Abe, Kaito Ariu

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) plays a crucial role in aligning language models with human preferences. While the significance of dataset quality is generally recognized, explicit investigations into its impact within the RLHF framework, to our knowledge, have been limited. This paper addresses the issue of text quality within the preference dataset by focusing on direct preference optimization (DPO), an increasingly adopted reward-model-free RLHF method. We confirm that text quality significantly influences the performance of models optimized with DPO more than those optimized with reward-model-based RLHF. Building on this new insight, we propose an extension of DPO, termed filtered direct preference optimization (fDPO). fDPO uses a trained reward model to monitor the quality of texts within the preference dataset during DPO training. Samples of lower quality are discarded based on comparisons with texts generated by the model being optimized, resulting in a more accurate dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that fDPO enhances the final model performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/filtered-dpo.

Read more

7/8/2024