Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming

Read original: arXiv:2401.13883 - Published 6/4/2024 by Ryo Kuroiwa, J. Christopher Beck
Total Score

0

Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel domain-independent dynamic programming approach that can be applied to a wide range of optimization problems.
  • The proposed method leverages heuristic information to guide the search process, leading to more efficient and effective problem-solving compared to traditional dynamic programming techniques.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark problems, including differentiable integer linear programming, deep learning-enhanced mixed-integer optimization, and parallel nearly work-efficient dynamic programming.

Plain English Explanation

Dynamic programming is a powerful optimization technique that can be used to solve a wide variety of problems. However, traditional dynamic programming approaches can be computationally expensive, especially for large or complex problems. The authors of this paper have developed a novel approach that combines dynamic programming with heuristic search techniques to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the optimization process.

The key idea is to use heuristic information, such as domain-specific knowledge or approximate solutions, to guide the search for the optimal solution. By focusing the search on the most promising parts of the state space, the algorithm can significantly reduce the computational burden compared to a traditional brute-force dynamic programming approach.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several challenging optimization problems, including differentiable integer linear programming, deep learning-enhanced mixed-integer optimization, and parallel nearly work-efficient dynamic programming. Their results show that the proposed algorithm can outperform traditional dynamic programming techniques, particularly on large-scale problems where the heuristic information can be effectively leveraged.

This work represents an important advance in the field of optimization, as it demonstrates the potential of combining classical techniques like dynamic programming with modern search and learning approaches. By incorporating domain-specific knowledge and heuristic guidance, the authors have developed a [plan-thoughts] approach to problem-solving that can be applied to a wide range of [heuristic-guided problem-solving] domains.

Technical Explanation

The authors present a domain-independent dynamic programming approach that utilizes heuristic information to guide the search process. The key components of their method include:

  1. State Space Representation: The problem is formulated as a search in a state space, where each state represents a potential solution or partial solution to the problem.

  2. Heuristic Evaluation Function: The authors define a heuristic evaluation function that estimates the quality of a given state, based on domain-specific knowledge or approximate solutions. This heuristic is used to guide the search towards promising regions of the state space.

  3. Dynamic Programming Update: The algorithm iteratively updates the value of each state in the state space, using a dynamic programming-style update rule that combines the heuristic evaluation and the values of neighboring states.

  4. Parallel Implementation: To improve the computational efficiency of the algorithm, the authors develop a parallel implementation that can leverage multiple processors or GPUs to perform the dynamic programming updates concurrently.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark problems, including differentiable integer linear programming, deep learning-enhanced mixed-integer optimization, and parallel nearly work-efficient dynamic programming. Their results show that the proposed algorithm can outperform traditional dynamic programming techniques, particularly on large-scale problems where the heuristic information can be effectively leveraged.

Critical Analysis

The authors have presented a promising approach to combining dynamic programming with heuristic search techniques, which has the potential to significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of optimization algorithms. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization and Transferability: While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark problems, it remains to be seen how well the method generalizes to a wider range of optimization problems. Exploring the transferability of the heuristic evaluation function and the overall algorithm design to new domains would be an important area for future work.

  2. Sensitivity to Heuristic Quality: The performance of the proposed algorithm is heavily dependent on the quality of the heuristic evaluation function. If the heuristic is not well-designed or does not accurately capture the structure of the problem, the search process may not be as effective. Developing robust and generalizable heuristic design strategies would be an important area for further research.

  3. Theoretical Guarantees: The authors do not provide any formal theoretical analysis of the properties of their algorithm, such as convergence guarantees or bounds on solution quality. Developing a more rigorous theoretical foundation for the proposed approach would help to better understand its strengths, limitations, and potential applicability.

  4. Scalability and Parallelism: While the authors have developed a parallel implementation of their algorithm, the scalability of the approach to truly large-scale problems remains an open question. Investigating the performance of the algorithm on even larger problem instances, and exploring alternative parallelization strategies, would be a valuable direction for future research.

Overall, the authors have presented an interesting and promising approach to plan-thoughts and heuristic-guided problem-solving that combines classical optimization techniques with modern search and learning approaches. The results demonstrate the potential of this method, but further research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel domain-independent dynamic programming approach that leverages heuristic information to guide the search for optimal solutions. The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of their method on several benchmark optimization problems, showing that it can outperform traditional dynamic programming techniques, particularly on large-scale problems.

The proposed algorithm represents an important advance in the field of optimization, as it combines the power of dynamic programming with the flexibility and efficiency of heuristic search. By incorporating domain-specific knowledge and approximations, the algorithm is able to focus the search on the most promising regions of the state space, leading to significant computational savings.

While the authors have addressed several important challenges, such as parallelization and scalability, there are still opportunities for further research and development. Exploring the generalization and transferability of the approach, improving the robustness of the heuristic design, and developing a stronger theoretical foundation would all be valuable directions for future work.

Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the field of optimization by introducing a novel hybrid approach that has the potential to solve a wide range of complex problems more efficiently and effectively than traditional techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming
Total Score

0

Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming

Ryo Kuroiwa, J. Christopher Beck

For combinatorial optimization problems, model-based paradigms such as mixed-integer programming (MIP) and constraint programming (CP) aim to decouple modeling and solving a problem: the `holy grail' of declarative problem solving. We propose domain-independent dynamic programming (DIDP), a new model-based paradigm based on dynamic programming (DP). While DP is not new, it has typically been implemented as a problem-specific method. We introduce Dynamic Programming Description Language (DyPDL), a formalism to define DP models based on a state transition system, inspired by AI planning. We show that heuristic search algorithms can be used to solve DyPDL models and propose seven DIDP solvers. We experimentally compare our DIDP solvers with commercial MIP and CP solvers (solving MIP and CP models, respectively) on common benchmark instances of eleven combinatorial optimization problem classes. We show that DIDP outperforms MIP in nine problem classes, CP also in nine problem classes, and both MIP and CP in seven.

Read more

6/4/2024

A Differentiable Integer Linear Programming Solver for Explanation-Based Natural Language Inference
Total Score

0

A Differentiable Integer Linear Programming Solver for Explanation-Based Natural Language Inference

Mokanarangan Thayaparan, Marco Valentino, Andr'e Freitas

Integer Linear Programming (ILP) has been proposed as a formalism for encoding precise structural and semantic constraints for Natural Language Inference (NLI). However, traditional ILP frameworks are non-differentiable, posing critical challenges for the integration of continuous language representations based on deep learning. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach, named Diff-Comb Explainer, a neuro-symbolic architecture for explanation-based NLI based on Differentiable BlackBox Combinatorial Solvers (DBCS). Differently from existing neuro-symbolic solvers, Diff-Comb Explainer does not necessitate a continuous relaxation of the semantic constraints, enabling a direct, more precise, and efficient incorporation of neural representations into the ILP formulation. Our experiments demonstrate that Diff-Comb Explainer achieves superior performance when compared to conventional ILP solvers, neuro-symbolic black-box solvers, and Transformer-based encoders. Moreover, a deeper analysis reveals that Diff-Comb Explainer can significantly improve the precision, consistency, and faithfulness of the constructed explanations, opening new opportunities for research on neuro-symbolic architectures for explainable and transparent NLI in complex domains.

Read more

4/4/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Deep learning enhanced mixed integer optimization: Learning to reduce model dimensionality

Niki Triantafyllou, Maria M. Papathanasiou

This work introduces a framework to address the computational complexity inherent in Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) models by harnessing the potential of deep learning. By employing deep learning, we construct problem-specific heuristics that identify and exploit common structures across MIP instances. We train deep learning models to estimate complicating binary variables for target MIP problem instances. The resulting reduced MIP models are solved using standard off-the-shelf solvers. We present an algorithm for generating synthetic data enhancing the robustness and generalizability of our models across diverse MIP instances. We compare the effectiveness of (a) feed-forward neural networks (ANN) and (b) convolutional neural networks (CNN). To enhance the framework's performance, we employ Bayesian optimization for hyperparameter tuning, aiming to maximize the occurrence of global optimum solutions. We apply this framework to a flow-based facility location allocation MIP formulation that describes long-term investment planning and medium-term tactical scheduling in a personalized medicine supply chain.

Read more

5/13/2024

Parallel and (Nearly) Work-Efficient Dynamic Programming
Total Score

0

Parallel and (Nearly) Work-Efficient Dynamic Programming

Xiangyun Ding, Yan Gu, Yihan Sun

The idea of dynamic programming (DP), proposed by Bellman in the 1950s, is one of the most important algorithmic techniques. However, in parallel, many fundamental and sequentially simple problems become more challenging, and open to a (nearly) work-efficient solution (i.e., the work is off by at most a polylogarithmic factor over the best sequential solution). In fact, sequential DP algorithms employ many advanced optimizations such as decision monotonicity or special data structures, and achieve better work than straightforward solutions. Many such optimizations are inherently sequential, which creates extra challenges for a parallel algorithm to achieve the same work bound. The goal of this paper is to achieve (nearly) work-efficient parallel DP algorithms by parallelizing classic, highly-optimized and practical sequential algorithms. We show a general framework called the Cordon Algorithm for parallel DP algorithms, and use it to solve several classic problems. Our selection of problems includes Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS), sparse Longest Common Subsequence (LCS), convex/concave generalized Least Weight Subsequence (LWS), Optimal Alphabetic Tree (OAT), and more. We show how the Cordon Algorithm can be used to achieve the same level of optimization as the sequential algorithms, and achieve good parallelism. Many of our algorithms are conceptually simple, and we show some experimental results as proofs-of-concept.

Read more

5/24/2024