Plan of Thoughts: Heuristic-Guided Problem Solving with Large Language Models

Overview

• Language models (LMs) can excel at zero-shot reasoning tasks, but struggle with multi-step problems
• Previous approaches involve breaking larger tasks into sub-tasks and using search algorithms to compose solutions
• This paper introduces two key contributions:
  1. A planning-based approach to multi-step problem-solving with LMs using Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs)
  2. Leveraging the online POMDP solver POMCP to achieve a 89.4% success rate on the Game of 24 task, with better anytime performance than fixed tree-search

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are incredibly capable at a wide variety of tasks, from answering questions to generating text. However, they struggle when it comes to solving problems that require multiple steps of reasoning. Previous research has looked at ways to address this by breaking down larger tasks into smaller sub-tasks, and then using search algorithms to piece together a full solution.

In this paper, the researchers take a different approach. They formalize the problem-solving process as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), where the LLM's own reflections on the value of each state are used as a heuristic to guide the search. By leveraging an online POMDP solver called POMCP, they are able to achieve a 89.4% success rate on the Game of 24 task - a significant improvement over previous approaches.

This work demonstrates how modern LLMs can be used to tackle more complex, multi-step reasoning tasks by incorporating their language understanding capabilities into a principled planning framework. This could have important implications for building AI systems that can solve real-world problems more effectively.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind this research is to formalize the process of multi-step problem-solving with LMs as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP). In a POMDP, the agent (in this case, the LM) must make decisions based on incomplete information about the current state of the environment.

The researchers leverage the LM's own reflections on the value of each state as a search heuristic to guide the planning process. This is implemented using the POMCP algorithm, an online POMDP solver that can efficiently explore the search space and compose solutions to the overall task.

To evaluate their approach, the researchers applied it to the Game of 24 task, where the goal is to combine a set of numbers using basic arithmetic operations to reach the target value of 24. They found that their POMDP-based method achieved a 89.4% success rate, significantly outperforming previous approaches that relied on fixed tree-search.

Importantly, the POMDP-based method also demonstrated better "anytime" performance, meaning it could return a reasonably good solution even if the search was interrupted before completion. This is a valuable property for real-world applications where computation time may be limited.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a compelling case for their POMDP-based approach to multi-step problem-solving with LMs. By leveraging the LM's own reflections on the value of different states, they are able to guide the search process more effectively than previous methods that relied on fixed tree-search.

However, it's worth noting that the Game of 24 task, while challenging, is still a relatively constrained and well-defined problem. It remains to be seen how well this approach would scale to more open-ended, real-world problems that may involve greater ambiguity and uncertainty.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or failure modes of this approach. For example, it's possible that the LM's value estimates could be biased or inaccurate in certain situations, leading the search process astray. Further research and testing would be needed to better understand the robustness and generalizability of this method.

Finally, it would be interesting to explore how this POMDP-based approach could be combined with other techniques, such as the use of smaller, more specialized language models to assist the larger LM, potentially further enhancing its multi-step reasoning capabilities.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to enabling large language models to tackle more complex, multi-step reasoning tasks. By formulating the problem-solving process as a POMDP and leveraging the LM's own reflections as a search heuristic, the researchers have demonstrated significant improvements in success rates and anytime performance compared to previous methods.

While there are still open questions and potential limitations to address, this work represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between the impressive zero-shot capabilities of LMs and their ability to engage in more structured, multi-step reasoning. As AI systems continue to become more sophisticated, approaches like this could play a crucial role in unlocking the full potential of language models to tackle real-world problems.