DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction

Read original: arXiv:2408.13460 - Published 8/27/2024 by Xinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Mingyi Hong, Meisam Razaviyayn
Total Score

0

DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • DOPPLER is a new technique that combines differentially private optimization with a low-pass filter to reduce the impact of privacy noise.
  • It aims to improve the performance of differentially private machine learning models by mitigating the signal loss caused by the addition of privacy noise.
  • The paper presents the DOPPLER algorithm and evaluates its performance on several machine learning tasks, comparing it to existing differentially private optimization methods.

Plain English Explanation

DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction is a new approach that tries to address a common problem in differentially private machine learning. When you add noise to the training data to protect privacy, it can degrade the performance of the model. DOPPLER uses a low-pass filter to remove some of this "privacy noise" without compromising privacy guarantees.

The key idea is that the privacy noise tends to be high-frequency, while the actual signal you want to learn is lower frequency. By filtering out the high-frequency noise, DOPPLER can improve the model's performance compared to other differentially private optimization methods. The paper evaluates DOPPLER on several machine learning tasks and shows it outperforms existing techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the DOPPLER algorithm, which combines differentially private optimization with a low-pass filter to reduce the impact of privacy noise. Differential privacy is a technique used to protect the privacy of individuals in machine learning datasets by adding noise to the data. However, this noise can degrade the performance of the trained model.

DOPPLER addresses this issue by applying a low-pass filter to the gradients used during optimization. This filter removes high-frequency components, which tend to be dominated by the privacy noise, while preserving the lower-frequency signal that contains the useful information for training the model. The authors show that this approach can improve the performance of differentially private machine learning models across a variety of tasks compared to existing methods.

The paper includes extensive experimental evaluations of DOPPLER on several machine learning benchmarks, including image classification, language modeling, and recommendation tasks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the low-pass filtering approach in mitigating the impact of privacy noise without compromising the privacy guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The DOPPLER paper presents a novel and promising approach for improving the performance of differentially private machine learning models. By leveraging a low-pass filter to remove high-frequency privacy noise, the authors are able to better preserve the useful signal in the training data.

One potential limitation of the approach is that the effectiveness of the low-pass filter may depend on the specific characteristics of the machine learning task and dataset. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to understand how to optimally configure the filter for different scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential computational overhead introduced by the low-pass filtering step. Depending on the complexity of the filter and the size of the model, this additional computation could impact the overall training time and efficiency of the DOPPLER approach.

Overall, the DOPPLER paper presents a compelling and well-executed study that advances the state-of-the-art in differentially private machine learning. The results demonstrate the value of carefully considering the properties of privacy noise and developing techniques to mitigate its impact. Further research to explore the broader applicability and efficiency of the DOPPLER approach could lead to even more impactful improvements in this important area of machine learning.

Conclusion

The DOPPLER paper introduces a novel technique for improving the performance of differentially private machine learning models. By combining differentially private optimization with a low-pass filter, DOPPLER is able to mitigate the impact of privacy noise without compromising the underlying privacy guarantees.

The experimental results show that DOPPLER outperforms existing differentially private optimization methods across a variety of machine learning tasks, including image classification, language modeling, and recommendation systems. This suggests that the low-pass filtering approach is a promising direction for enhancing the practical applicability of differentially private machine learning.

While the paper highlights some potential limitations and areas for further research, the DOPPLER technique represents an important step forward in addressing a key challenge in this field. As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains, techniques like DOPPLER will be crucial for enabling the widespread use of privacy-preserving machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 β†’

Related Papers

DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction
Total Score

0

DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction

Xinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Mingyi Hong, Meisam Razaviyayn

Privacy is a growing concern in modern deep-learning systems and applications. Differentially private (DP) training prevents the leakage of sensitive information in the collected training data from the trained machine learning models. DP optimizers, including DP stochastic gradient descent (DPSGD) and its variants, privatize the training procedure by gradient clipping and DP noise injection. However, in practice, DP models trained using DPSGD and its variants often suffer from significant model performance degradation. Such degradation prevents the application of DP optimization in many key tasks, such as foundation model pretraining. In this paper, we provide a novel signal processing perspective to the design and analysis of DP optimizers. We show that a ``frequency domain'' operation called low-pass filtering can be used to effectively reduce the impact of DP noise. More specifically, by defining the ``frequency domain'' for both the gradient and differential privacy (DP) noise, we have developed a new component, called DOPPLER. This component is designed for DP algorithms and works by effectively amplifying the gradient while suppressing DP noise within this frequency domain. As a result, it maintains privacy guarantees and enhances the quality of the DP-protected model. Our experiments show that the proposed DP optimizers with a low-pass filter outperform their counterparts without the filter by 3%-10% in test accuracy on various models and datasets. Both theoretical and practical evidence suggest that the DOPPLER is effective in closing the gap between DP and non-DP training.

Read more

8/27/2024

Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
Total Score

0

Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights

David Zagardo

Imagine training a machine learning model with Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), only to discover post-training that the noise level was either too high, crippling your model's utility, or too low, compromising privacy. The dreaded realization hits: you must start the lengthy training process from scratch. But what if you could avoid this retraining nightmare? In this study, we introduce a groundbreaking approach (to our knowledge) that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds, use formal methods to validate its privacy guarantees, and empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations. This method allows for a single training run, followed by post-hoc noise adjustments to achieve optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. We compare this novel fine-tuned model (DP-Weights model) to a traditional DP-SGD model, demonstrating that our approach yields statistically similar performance and privacy guarantees. Our results validate the efficacy of post-training noise application, promising significant time savings and flexibility in fine-tuning differential privacy parameters, making it a practical alternative for deploying differentially private models in real-world scenarios.

Read more

7/1/2024

GReDP: A More Robust Approach for Differential Privacy Training with Gradient-Preserving Noise Reduction
Total Score

0

New!GReDP: A More Robust Approach for Differential Privacy Training with Gradient-Preserving Noise Reduction

Haodi Wang, Tangyu Jiang, Yu Guo, Xiaohua Jia, Chengjun Cai

Deep learning models have been extensively adopted in various regions due to their ability to represent hierarchical features, which highly rely on the training set and procedures. Thus, protecting the training process and deep learning algorithms is paramount in privacy preservation. Although Differential Privacy (DP) as a powerful cryptographic primitive has achieved satisfying results in deep learning training, the existing schemes still fall short in preserving model utility, i.e., they either invoke a high noise scale or inevitably harm the original gradients. To address the above issues, in this paper, we present a more robust approach for DP training called GReDP. Specifically, we compute the model gradients in the frequency domain and adopt a new approach to reduce the noise level. Unlike the previous work, our GReDP only requires half of the noise scale compared to DPSGD [1] while keeping all the gradient information intact. We present a detailed analysis of our method both theoretically and empirically. The experimental results show that our GReDP works consistently better than the baselines on all models and training settings.

Read more

9/19/2024

πŸ”„

Total Score

0

Beyond the Mean: Differentially Private Prototypes for Private Transfer Learning

Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska Boenisch

Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to leak private information from their training datasets. Differential Privacy (DP), typically implemented through the differential private stochastic gradient descent algorithm (DP-SGD), has become the standard solution to bound leakage from the models. Despite recent improvements, DP-SGD-based approaches for private learning still usually struggle in the high privacy ($varepsilonle1)$ and low data regimes, and when the private training datasets are imbalanced. To overcome these limitations, we propose Differentially Private Prototype Learning (DPPL) as a new paradigm for private transfer learning. DPPL leverages publicly pre-trained encoders to extract features from private data and generates DP prototypes that represent each private class in the embedding space and can be publicly released for inference. Since our DP prototypes can be obtained from only a few private training data points and without iterative noise addition, they offer high-utility predictions and strong privacy guarantees even under the notion of pure DP. We additionally show that privacy-utility trade-offs can be further improved when leveraging the public data beyond pre-training of the encoder: in particular, we can privately sample our DP prototypes from the publicly available data points used to train the encoder. Our experimental evaluation with four state-of-the-art encoders, four vision datasets, and under different data and imbalancedness regimes demonstrate DPPL's high performance under strong privacy guarantees in challenging private learning setups.

Read more

6/13/2024