Double Variance Reduction: A Smoothing Trick for Composite Optimization Problems without First-Order Gradient

Overview

• Variance reduction techniques are used to improve the performance of first-order (FO) and zeroth-order (ZO) optimization methods by reducing sampling variance.
• In composite optimization problems, ZO methods face an additional challenge called coordinate-wise variance, which stems from random gradient estimation.
• Prior methods for reducing coordinate-wise variance require estimating all partial derivatives, which is computationally expensive, especially in high-dimensional scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

Optimization is a common task in machine learning and other fields, where we try to find the best set of parameters or values to minimize or maximize some objective function. Variance reduction techniques are used to make this optimization process more efficient by reducing the amount of randomness or "noise" in the calculations.

There are two main types of optimization methods: first-order (FO) and zeroth-order (ZO). FO methods use information about the gradient of the objective function, while ZO methods only use the function values themselves, without any gradient information.

In some problems, called "composite optimization" problems, ZO methods face an additional challenge. The random way they estimate the gradient can introduce an extra source of variance, called "coordinate-wise variance." This coordinate-wise variance makes the optimization process slower and less accurate.

Previous methods for dealing with this coordinate-wise variance required estimating all the partial derivatives of the objective function, which is very computationally expensive, especially in problems with a lot of dimensions (i.e., a lot of parameters to optimize).

Technical Explanation

This paper proposes a new method called Zeroth-order Proximal Double Variance Reduction (ZPDVR) that can effectively reduce both the sampling variance and the coordinate-wise variance in composite optimization problems, without needing to estimate all the partial derivatives.

ZPDVR uses a technique called the "averaging trick" to reduce these two sources of variance. Importantly, ZPDVR only needs to call the stochastic zeroth-order oracle (SZO) - the function that provides the function value and gradient estimates - a constant number of times per iteration, on average. This is a significant improvement over previous methods, which required calling the SZO O(d) times per iteration, where d is the problem dimensionality.

The paper shows that ZPDVR achieves the optimal O(d(n + κ)log(1/ε)) SZO query complexity in the strongly convex and smooth setting, where n is the number of iterations, κ is the condition number, and ε is the desired accuracy. This means ZPDVR can converge to the optimal solution very efficiently, even in high-dimensional problems.

The empirical results presented in the paper validate ZPDVR's linear convergence and demonstrate its superior performance compared to other related methods, such as those discussed in this paper and this one.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the ZPDVR method and its convergence guarantees. However, the authors do not discuss any potential limitations or drawbacks of their approach.

For example, the paper assumes the objective function is strongly convex and smooth, which may not always be the case in real-world optimization problems. It would be valuable to understand how ZPDVR performs under more general, non-convex or non-smooth settings.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not provide a comprehensive empirical evaluation. While the results show ZPDVR outperforming other methods, it would be helpful to see a more diverse set of experiments, including comparisons to other variance reduction techniques and gradient estimation methods, as well as an analysis of ZPDVR's practical computational overhead.

Conclusion

The ZPDVR method proposed in this paper represents an important advancement in the field of zeroth-order optimization for composite problems. By effectively reducing both sampling and coordinate-wise variance, ZPDVR can converge to the optimal solution much more efficiently than previous approaches, especially in high-dimensional settings.

While the theoretical guarantees are strong, further empirical validation and analysis of ZPDVR's limitations and applicability to a broader range of optimization problems would help solidify its practical impact and guide future research in this area.