DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Differential privacy (DP) and deep neural networks (DNNs) are two powerful techniques that, when combined, can enable the privacy-preserving release of high-utility models trained on sensitive data.
- A classic mechanism for this purpose is DP-SGD, which is a differentially private version of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimizer commonly used for DNN training.
- However, the core mechanism for enforcing DP in the SGD optimizer has remained largely unchanged since the original DP-SGD algorithm, which has become a barrier limiting the performance of DP-compliant machine learning solutions.
Plain English Explanation
Differential privacy is a way to protect the privacy of individuals in a dataset by adding a small amount of noise to the data. This ensures that the results of any analysis on the data cannot be used to identify specific individuals. Deep neural networks are a powerful type of machine learning model that can be trained to perform a variety of tasks, such as image recognition or language processing.
By combining differential privacy and deep learning, researchers can train high-performance machine learning models while still protecting the privacy of the individuals in the dataset. One way to do this is through a technique called DP-SGD, which is a version of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm that has been modified to satisfy differential privacy.
However, the core mechanism for enforcing differential privacy in the SGD algorithm has not changed much since the original DP-SGD algorithm was developed. This has become a limitation, as researchers have been unable to significantly improve the performance of DP-compliant machine learning solutions.
Technical Explanation
To address this limitation, the researchers propose a new mechanism called DPIS (Differentially Private Importance Sampling) for the SGD optimizer used in deep learning with differential privacy. The key idea is to use importance sampling to select the mini-batches of data used in each training iteration, which can reduce both the sampling variance and the amount of random noise that needs to be injected to satisfy differential privacy.
Integrating importance sampling into the complex mathematical machinery of DP-SGD is a non-trivial challenge, which the researchers address through novel mechanism designs, fine-grained privacy analysis, efficiency enhancements, and an adaptive gradient clipping optimization.
The researchers evaluate DPIS on four benchmark datasets (MNIST, FMNIST, CIFAR-10, and IMDb) and demonstrate that it consistently outperforms the standard DP-SGD algorithm in terms of model accuracy while still satisfying differential privacy.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that while DPIS offers significant improvements over DP-SGD, there are still some limitations and areas for further research. For example, they note that the adaptive gradient clipping optimization used in DPIS may not be optimal for all types of models and datasets, and that further work is needed to understand the interplay between importance sampling and the overall training dynamics.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around the scalability of DPIS to very large datasets or the computational overhead of the importance sampling mechanism. These are important practical considerations that would need to be addressed for DPIS to be widely adopted in real-world applications.
Overall, the DPIS approach represents a promising advance in the field of differentially private deep learning, but further research and development will be needed to fully realize its potential and address any remaining challenges.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel mechanism called DPIS (Differentially Private Importance Sampling) for the SGD optimizer used in deep learning with differential privacy. DPIS integrates importance sampling into the DP-SGD algorithm, which can significantly improve the accuracy of differentially private machine learning models while still satisfying the privacy constraints.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of DPIS on several benchmark datasets, and the paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop privacy-preserving machine learning solutions that can be deployed in sensitive domains like healthcare and finance. However, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, which the researchers acknowledge and leave for future work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling
Jianxin Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin Yang
Nowadays, differential privacy (DP) has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection, and deep neural networks (DNN) have been immensely successful in machine learning. The combination of these two techniques, i.e., deep learning with differential privacy, promises the privacy-preserving release of high-utility models trained with sensitive data such as medical records. A classic mechanism for this purpose is DP-SGD, which is a differentially private version of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimizer commonly used for DNN training. Subsequent approaches have improved various aspects of the model training process, including noise decay schedule, model architecture, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning. However, the core mechanism for enforcing DP in the SGD optimizer remains unchanged ever since the original DP-SGD algorithm, which has increasingly become a fundamental barrier limiting the performance of DP-compliant machine learning solutions. Motivated by this, we propose DPIS, a novel mechanism for differentially private SGD training that can be used as a drop-in replacement of the core optimizer of DP-SGD, with consistent and significant accuracy gains over the latter. The main idea is to employ importance sampling (IS) in each SGD iteration for mini-batch selection, which reduces both sampling variance and the amount of random noise injected to the gradients that is required to satisfy DP. Integrating IS into the complex mathematical machinery of DP-SGD is highly non-trivial. DPIS addresses the challenge through novel mechanism designs, fine-grained privacy analysis, efficiency enhancements, and an adaptive gradient clipping optimization. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets, namely MNIST, FMNIST, CIFAR-10 and IMDb, demonstrate the superior effectiveness of DPIS over existing solutions for deep learning with differential privacy.
Read more8/2/2024
🌿
0
The Normal Distributions Indistinguishability Spectrum and its Application to Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Yun Lu, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Yu Wei, Vassilis Zikas
Differential Privacy (DP) (and its variants) is the most common method for machine learning (ML) on privacy-sensitive data. In big data analytics, one often uses randomized sketching/aggregation algorithms to make processing high-dimensional data tractable. Intuitively, such ML algorithms should provide some inherent privacy, yet most existing DP mechanisms do not leverage or under-utilize this inherent randomness, resulting in potentially redundant noising. The motivating question of our work is: (How) can we improve the utility of DP mechanisms for randomized ML queries, by leveraging the randomness of the query itself? Towards a (positive) answer, our key contribution is (proving) what we call the NDIS theorem, a theoretical result with several practical implications. In a nutshell, NDIS is a closed-form analytic computation for the (varepsilon,delta)-indistinguishability-spectrum (IS) of two arbitrary normal distributions N1 and N2, i.e., the optimal delta (for any given varepsilon) such that N1 and N2 are (varepsilon,delta)-close according to the DP distance. The importance of the NDIS theorem lies in that (1) it yields efficient estimators for IS, and (2) it allows us to analyze DP-mechanism with normally-distributed outputs, as well as more general mechanisms by leveraging their behavior on large inputs. We apply the NDIS theorem to derive DP mechanisms for queries with normally-distributed outputs--i.e., Gaussian Random Projections (RP)--and for more general queries--i.e., Ordinary Least Squares (OLS). Compared to existing techniques, our new DP mechanisms achieve superior privacy/utility trade-offs by leveraging the randomness of the underlying algorithms. We then apply the NDIS theorem to a data-driven DP notion--in particular relative DP introduced by Lu et al. [S&P 2024]. Our method identifies the range of (varepsilon,delta) for which no additional noising is needed.
Read more6/24/2024
🏅
0
Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD
Anvith Thudi, Hengrui Jia, Casey Meehan, Ilia Shumailov, Nicolas Papernot
Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) is the canonical approach to private deep learning. While the current privacy analysis of DP-SGD is known to be tight in some settings, several empirical results suggest that models trained on common benchmark datasets leak significantly less privacy for many datapoints. Yet, despite past attempts, a rigorous explanation for why this is the case has not been reached. Is it because there exist tighter privacy upper bounds when restricted to these dataset settings, or are our attacks not strong enough for certain datapoints? In this paper, we provide the first per-instance (i.e., ``data-dependent) DP analysis of DP-SGD. Our analysis captures the intuition that points with similar neighbors in the dataset enjoy better data-dependent privacy than outliers. Formally, this is done by modifying the per-step privacy analysis of DP-SGD to introduce a dependence on the distribution of model updates computed from a training dataset. We further develop a new composition theorem to effectively use this new per-step analysis to reason about an entire training run. Put all together, our evaluation shows that this novel DP-SGD analysis allows us to now formally show that DP-SGD leaks significantly less privacy for many datapoints (when trained on common benchmarks) than the current data-independent guarantee. This implies privacy attacks will necessarily fail against many datapoints if the adversary does not have sufficient control over the possible training datasets.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
David Zagardo
Imagine training a machine learning model with Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), only to discover post-training that the noise level was either too high, crippling your model's utility, or too low, compromising privacy. The dreaded realization hits: you must start the lengthy training process from scratch. But what if you could avoid this retraining nightmare? In this study, we introduce a groundbreaking approach (to our knowledge) that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds, use formal methods to validate its privacy guarantees, and empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations. This method allows for a single training run, followed by post-hoc noise adjustments to achieve optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. We compare this novel fine-tuned model (DP-Weights model) to a traditional DP-SGD model, demonstrating that our approach yields statistically similar performance and privacy guarantees. Our results validate the efficacy of post-training noise application, promising significant time savings and flexibility in fine-tuning differential privacy parameters, making it a practical alternative for deploying differentially private models in real-world scenarios.
Read more7/1/2024