EF-Calib: Spatiotemporal Calibration of Event- and Frame-Based Cameras Using Continuous-Time Trajectories

Overview

• This paper proposes a method called EF-Calib for spatiotemporal calibration of event-based and frame-based cameras using continuous-time trajectories.

• The method jointly estimates the spatial and temporal parameters between the two camera types, enabling applications like robust visual odometry and 3D reconstruction.

• EF-Calib uses a continuous-time representation of the camera trajectory, which provides more accurate alignment between the event and frame data compared to discrete-time approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Event-based cameras and traditional frame-based cameras have complementary strengths - event cameras are fast and robust to motion blur, while frame-based cameras provide dense visual information. Cascalib: Cascaded Calibration for Motion Capture from Sparse Data and Event-Based Structure from Orbit have explored ways to combine these two types of cameras.

To effectively fuse the data from both camera types, the spatial and temporal offsets between them need to be precisely calibrated. EF-Calib addresses this by modeling the camera trajectories as continuous-time functions rather than discrete samples. This allows better alignment of the event and frame data, leading to more accurate calibration.

The key innovation is representing the camera motion as a smooth curve over time, rather than a series of individual positions. This continuous-time model captures subtle movements that would be missed by traditional discrete-time approaches like IMU-Aided Event-based Stereo Visual Odometry or EVI-SAM: Robust Real-Time Tightly-Coupled. The method can also estimate the time offset between the event and frame data, further improving the calibration.

Technical Explanation

EF-Calib models the 6D camera trajectory as a continuous-time function represented by B-splines. This allows the method to capture smooth, nonlinear motion more accurately than discrete-time approaches. The spatial calibration between the event and frame cameras is represented by a 3D rotation and translation, while the temporal calibration is a single time offset parameter.

The method optimizes these spatial and temporal parameters by minimizing the reprojection error between observed 3D points and their projections in both the event and frame data. A novel joint likelihood function is used that accounts for both the event and frame observations.

Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of EF-Calib over state-of-the-art methods. The continuous-time modeling and joint optimization lead to significantly more accurate spatiotemporal calibration, enabling applications like robust visual odometry and 3D reconstruction that combine the strengths of event and frame cameras.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of EF-Calib, comparing it to several baseline methods across multiple datasets. The results clearly show the benefits of the continuous-time trajectory modeling and joint optimization approach.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or failure cases of the method. For example, it is unclear how EF-Calib would perform in the presence of large, abrupt camera motions that violate the smooth trajectory assumption. Additionally, the method requires prior 3D information about the environment, which may not always be available in practical scenarios.

Further research could explore ways to relax these assumptions, such as by incorporating inertial measurement unit (IMU) data as in Lightweight Spatiotemporal Network for Online Eye Tracking with Events, or by developing self-calibration techniques that do not rely on known 3D structure.

Conclusion

The EF-Calib method presented in this paper represents an important advance in spatiotemporal calibration for event-based and frame-based cameras. By modeling the camera trajectory as a continuous-time function, the technique can achieve more accurate alignment of the two data modalities, enabling robust fusion for applications like visual odometry and 3D reconstruction.

The promising results demonstrate the value of combining the complementary strengths of event and frame cameras, with the potential to significantly improve the performance of computer vision systems in challenging real-world scenarios. Further development and exploration of the limitations of this approach could lead to even broader applicability and impact.