Effective Bayesian Causal Inference via Structural Marginalisation and Autoregressive Orders

Read original: arXiv:2402.14781 - Published 7/17/2024 by Christian Toth, Christian Knoll, Franz Pernkopf, Robert Peharz
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a novel Bayesian causal inference approach called "Rao-Blackwellising Bayesian Causal Inference" (RBCI).
  • RBCI combines Bayesian modeling with a technique known as "Rao-Blackwellization" to improve the efficiency and accuracy of causal effect estimation.
  • The method aims to address limitations in existing Bayesian causal inference approaches, such as computational complexity and sensitivity to prior assumptions.

Plain English Explanation

RBCI is a way to estimate the causal effects of interventions or changes in a system using Bayesian statistics. Bayesian methods allow us to incorporate prior knowledge and uncertainty into the analysis, but they can be computationally expensive and sensitive to the specific assumptions we make.

RBCI tries to address these issues by using a technique called "Rao-Blackwellization." This allows us to break down the problem into simpler pieces, reducing the computational burden and making the results less dependent on the specific prior assumptions we choose.

Imagine you want to understand how changing the price of a product might affect its sales. You could use RBCI to model this relationship in a Bayesian way, incorporating your existing knowledge about the market and the uncertainty in the data. The Rao-Blackwellization step would then help you compute the causal effect more efficiently and reliably, without getting bogged down in overly complex calculations or being too sensitive to your initial assumptions.

Overall, RBCI provides a more robust and practical way to perform Bayesian causal inference, with applications in fields like economics, medicine, and social science where understanding causal relationships is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a Bayesian causal inference method called Rao-Blackwellising Bayesian Causal Inference (RBCI). RBCI is designed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of causal effect estimation compared to existing Bayesian approaches.

The key idea is to leverage Rao-Blackwellization, a technique that reduces the variance of Monte Carlo estimates by integrating out certain model parameters. In the context of causal inference, this allows the method to marginalize over the latent confounding variables, leading to more stable and reliable estimates of causal effects.

The authors demonstrate RBCI in the context of structural causal models with latent variables, where it outperforms standard Bayesian methods in terms of computational efficiency and robustness to prior assumptions.

The paper also includes experiments on Bayesian vector autoregression models, demonstrating RBCI's ability to uncover Granger causal relationships in time series data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach to Bayesian causal inference, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for future research:

  1. Scalability: While Rao-Blackwellization improves computational efficiency, the authors note that the method may still struggle with high-dimensional models or large datasets.

  2. Sensitivity to model assumptions: Although RBCI is more robust to prior assumptions than standard Bayesian methods, the authors emphasize that the validity of the results still depends on the correctness of the structural causal model.

  3. Identifiability: The paper discusses the challenges of identifying causal effects in the presence of latent variables and highlights the need for further research on this topic.

  4. Generalization: The experiments in the paper focus on specific types of causal models and time series data. Further research is needed to assess the broader applicability of RBCI to a wider range of causal inference problems.

Overall, the RBCI approach represents a valuable contribution to the field of Bayesian causal inference, but there is still room for improvement and continued investigation of its limitations and potential extensions.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel Bayesian causal inference method called Rao-Blackwellising Bayesian Causal Inference (RBCI), which leverages Rao-Blackwellization to improve the efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimation. RBCI addresses key limitations of existing Bayesian approaches, such as computational complexity and sensitivity to prior assumptions.

The technical evaluation demonstrates RBCI's advantages over standard Bayesian methods, particularly in the context of structural causal models with latent variables and Bayesian vector autoregression models. While the method shows promise, the authors also identify areas for future research, such as scalability, sensitivity to model assumptions, identifiability, and generalization to a broader range of causal inference problems.

Overall, the RBCI approach represents an important step forward in the field of Bayesian causal inference, with potential applications in diverse domains where understanding causal relationships is crucial, such as economics, medicine, and the social sciences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Effective Bayesian Causal Inference via Structural Marginalisation and Autoregressive Orders

Christian Toth, Christian Knoll, Franz Pernkopf, Robert Peharz

Bayesian causal inference (BCI) naturally incorporates epistemic uncertainty about the true causal model into down-stream causal reasoning tasks by posterior averaging over causal models. However, this poses a tremendously hard computational problem due to the intractable number of causal structures to marginalise over. In this work, we decompose the structure learning problem into inferring (i) a causal order and (ii) a parent set for each variable given a causal order. By limiting the number of parents per variable, we can exactly marginalise over the parent sets in polynomial time, which leaves only the causal order to be marginalised. To this end, we propose a novel autoregressive model over causal orders (ARCO) learnable with gradient-based methods. Our method yields state-of-the-art in structure learning on simulated non-linear additive noise benchmarks with scale-free and Erdos-Renyi graph structures, and competitive results on real-world data. Moreover, we illustrate that our method accurately infers interventional distributions, which allows us to estimate posterior average causal effects and many other causal quantities of interest.

Read more

7/17/2024

Bayesian Vector AutoRegression with Factorised Granger-Causal Graphs
Total Score

0

Bayesian Vector AutoRegression with Factorised Granger-Causal Graphs

He Zhao, Vassili Kitsios, Terence J. O'Kane, Edwin V. Bonilla

We study the problem of automatically discovering Granger causal relations from observational multivariate time-series data.Vector autoregressive (VAR) models have been time-tested for this problem, including Bayesian variants and more recent developments using deep neural networks. Most existing VAR methods for Granger causality use sparsity-inducing penalties/priors or post-hoc thresholds to interpret their coefficients as Granger causal graphs. Instead, we propose a new Bayesian VAR model with a hierarchical factorised prior distribution over binary Granger causal graphs, separately from the VAR coefficients. We develop an efficient algorithm to infer the posterior over binary Granger causal graphs. Comprehensive experiments on synthetic, semi-synthetic, and climate data show that our method is more uncertainty aware, has less hyperparameters, and achieves better performance than competing approaches, especially in low-data regimes where there are less observations.

Read more

5/27/2024

Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm
Total Score

0

Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm

Mathieu Chevalley, Patrick Schwab, Arash Mehrjou

Targeted and uniform interventions to a system are crucial for unveiling causal relationships. While several methods have been developed to leverage interventional data for causal structure learning, their practical application in real-world scenarios often remains challenging. Recent benchmark studies have highlighted these difficulties, even when large numbers of single-variable intervention samples are available. In this work, we demonstrate, both theoretically and empirically, that such datasets contain a wealth of causal information that can be effectively extracted under realistic assumptions about the data distribution. More specifically, we introduce the notion of interventional faithfulness, which relies on comparisons between the marginal distributions of each variable across observational and interventional settings, and we introduce a score on causal orders. Under this assumption, we are able to prove strong theoretical guarantees on the optimum of our score that also hold for large-scale settings. To empirically verify our theory, we introduce Intersort, an algorithm designed to infer the causal order from datasets containing large numbers of single-variable interventions by approximately optimizing our score. Intersort outperforms baselines (GIES, PC and EASE) on almost all simulated data settings replicating common benchmarks in the field. Our proposed novel approach to modeling interventional datasets thus offers a promising avenue for advancing causal inference, highlighting significant potential for further enhancements under realistic assumptions.

Read more

5/29/2024

Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding
Total Score

0

Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding

Daniela Schkoda, Elina Robeva, Mathias Drton

We consider linear non-Gaussian structural equation models that involve latent confounding. In this setting, the causal structure is identifiable, but, in general, it is not possible to identify the specific causal effects. Instead, a finite number of different causal effects result in the same observational distribution. Most existing algorithms for identifying these causal effects use overcomplete independent component analysis (ICA), which often suffers from convergence to local optima. Furthermore, the number of latent variables must be known a priori. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm that operates recursively rather than using overcomplete ICA. The algorithm first infers a source, estimates the effect of the source and its latent parents on their descendants, and then eliminates their influence from the data. For both source identification and effect size estimation, we use rank conditions on matrices formed from higher-order cumulants. We prove asymptotic correctness under the mild assumption that locally, the number of latent variables never exceeds the number of observed variables. Simulation studies demonstrate that our method achieves comparable performance to overcomplete ICA even though it does not know the number of latents in advance.

Read more

8/12/2024