The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agents
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the effects of embodiment and personality expression on learning outcomes in educational agents powered by large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers explored how different approaches to representing personality and embodiment in conversational agents can impact the learning experience for students.
- The study compared the performance of LLM-based educational agents with varying degrees of personality expression and embodiment in learning tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the way an AI tutor or educational agent is designed can affect how well students learn from it. The researchers looked at two key factors: embodiment (whether the agent has a visual representation like an avatar) and personality expression (how the agent communicates and interacts).
They created different versions of an LLM-based educational agent, some with more personality and embodiment, some with less. Then they had students interact with these agents and measured how much the students learned. The goal was to see if the way the agent is designed influences the learning outcomes.
This is an important question because as AI-powered educational tools become more common, we need to understand how to design them to be as effective as possible at helping students learn. Personality and embodiment could be key factors in making these agents more engaging and impactful.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to test the effects of embodiment and personality expression in LLM-based educational agents. They created four agent variants:
- Low Embodiment, Low Personality: A minimal agent with no visual representation and a neutral, factual communication style.
- Low Embodiment, High Personality: An agent with no visual representation but a more expressive, engaging communication style.
- High Embodiment, Low Personality: An agent with a visual avatar but a neutral, factual communication style.
- High Embodiment, High Personality: An agent with a visual avatar and an expressive, engaging communication style.
Students interacted with these agents while completing various learning tasks. The researchers measured outcomes like learning gains, engagement, and perceptions of the agent's likability and trustworthiness.
The results showed that the agents with high personality expression (regardless of embodiment) led to better learning outcomes and more positive perceptions from students. Embodiment alone did not have a significant effect. These findings suggest that the way an agent communicates and expresses its personality may be more important than its visual representation.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the design of effective educational agents powered by large language models. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, so it's unclear how the results would translate to real-world educational contexts. Further testing in authentic learning environments would be helpful.
- The researchers used predefined personality traits and embodiment designs. Exploring more nuanced or adaptive approaches to personality expression could yield additional insights.
- The study focused on immediate learning outcomes. Investigating the long-term impacts of these agent designs on retention and transfer of knowledge would be an important next step.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the importance of personality expression, it doesn't fully address the potential risks of overly anthropomorphic agents or the ethical considerations around the capabilities and limitations of these systems. Deeper exploration of these issues could strengthen the overall research.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence that the way an educational agent expresses its personality can have a significant impact on student learning and engagement. Agents with a more expressive, engaging communication style were found to be more effective at supporting learning outcomes, regardless of whether they had a visual embodiment.
These findings have important implications for the design of AI-powered educational tools, as researchers and developers work to create agents that can foster positive learning experiences and outcomes. By carefully considering personality expression, along with other factors like adaptability and transparency, the next generation of educational agents may be able to truly enhance and transform the way students learn.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agents
Sinan Sonlu, Bennie Bendiksen, Funda Durupinar, Uu{g}ur Gudukbay
This work investigates how personality expression and embodiment affect personality perception and learning in educational conversational agents. We extend an existing personality-driven conversational agent framework by integrating LLM-based conversation support tailored to an educational application. We describe a user study built on this system to evaluate two distinct personality styles: high extroversion and agreeableness and low extroversion and agreeableness. For each personality style, we assess three models: (1) a dialogue-only model that conveys personality through dialogue, (2) an animated human model that expresses personality solely through dialogue, and (3) an animated human model that expresses personality through both dialogue and body and facial animations. The results indicate that all models are positively perceived regarding both personality and learning outcomes. Models with high personality traits are perceived as more engaging than those with low personality traits. We provide a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis of perceived personality traits, learning parameters, and user experiences based on participant ratings of the model types and personality styles, as well as users' responses to open-ended questions.
Read more7/17/2024
0
PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models
Zheni Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Huimin Chen, Yukun Yan, Yuxuan Chen, Zhenghao Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Large language models exhibit aspects of human-level intelligence that catalyze their application as human-like agents in domains such as social simulations, human-machine interactions, and collaborative multi-agent systems. However, the absence of distinct personalities, such as displaying ingratiating behaviors, inconsistent opinions, and uniform response patterns, diminish LLMs utility in practical applications. Addressing this, the development of personality traits in LLMs emerges as a crucial area of research to unlock their latent potential. Existing methods to personify LLMs generally involve strategies like employing stylized training data for instruction tuning or using prompt engineering to simulate different personalities. These methods only capture superficial linguistic styles instead of the core of personalities and are therefore not stable. In this study, we propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development, into a comprehensive training methodology. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality. Single-agent evaluation validates our method's superiority, as it produces responses more aligned with reference personalities compared to other approaches. Case studies for multi-agent communication highlight its benefits in enhancing opinion consistency within individual agents and fostering collaborative creativity among multiple agents in dialogue contexts, potentially benefiting human simulation and multi-agent cooperation. Additionally, human-agent interaction evaluations indicate that our personified models significantly enhance interactive experiences, underscoring the practical implications of our research.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Personality-aware Student Simulation for Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Zhengyuan Liu, Stella Xin Yin, Geyu Lin, Nancy F. Chen
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) can provide personalized and self-paced learning experience. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) further enables better human-machine interaction, and facilitates the development of conversational ITSs in various disciplines such as math and language learning. In dialogic teaching, recognizing and adapting to individual characteristics can significantly enhance student engagement and learning efficiency. However, characterizing and simulating student's persona remain challenging in training and evaluating conversational ITSs. In this work, we propose a framework to construct profiles of different student groups by refining and integrating both cognitive and noncognitive aspects, and leverage LLMs for personality-aware student simulation in a language learning scenario. We further enhance the framework with multi-aspect validation, and conduct extensive analysis from both teacher and student perspectives. Our experimental results show that state-of-the-art LLMs can produce diverse student responses according to the given language ability and personality traits, and trigger teacher's adaptive scaffolding strategies.
Read more4/11/2024
💬
0
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, Jad Kabbara
Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then assess their essays with automatic and human evaluations. Results show that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their designated personality types, with large effect sizes observed across five traits. Additionally, LLM personas' writings have emerging representative linguistic patterns for personality traits when compared with a human writing corpus. Furthermore, human evaluation shows that humans can perceive some personality traits with an accuracy of up to 80%. Interestingly, the accuracy drops significantly when the annotators were informed of AI authorship.
Read more4/3/2024