On the Efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks
2404.03617
1
0
🧠
Abstract
Since the breakthrough performance of AlexNet in 2012, convolutional neural networks (convnets) have grown into extremely powerful vision models. Deep learning researchers have used convnets to produce accurate results that were unachievable a decade ago. Yet computer scientists make computational efficiency their primary objective. Accuracy with exorbitant cost is not acceptable; an algorithm must also minimize its computational requirements. Confronted with the daunting computation that convnets use, deep learning researchers also became interested in efficiency. Researchers applied tremendous effort to find the convnet architectures that have the greatest efficiency. However, skepticism grew among researchers and engineers alike about the relevance of arithmetic complexity. Contrary to the prevailing view that latency and arithmetic complexity are irreconcilable, a simple formula relates both through computational efficiency. This insight enabled us to co-optimize the separate factors that determine latency. We observed that the degenerate conv2d layers that produce the best accuracy-complexity trade-off also have low operational intensity. Therefore, kernels that implement these layers use significant memory resources. We solved this optimization problem with block-fusion kernels that implement all layers of a residual block, thereby creating temporal locality, avoiding communication, and reducing workspace size. Our ConvFirst model with block-fusion kernels ran approximately four times as fast as the ConvNeXt baseline with PyTorch Inductor, at equal accuracy on the ImageNet-1K classification task. Our unified approach to convnet efficiency envisions a new era of models and kernels that achieve greater accuracy at lower cost.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Convolutional neural networks (convnets) have become extremely powerful vision models since the breakthrough performance of AlexNet in 2012.
- Deep learning researchers have used convnets to produce accurate results that were unachievable a decade ago.
- However, computer scientists are also focused on computational efficiency, as accuracy with exorbitant cost is not acceptable.
- Researchers have applied tremendous effort to find the most efficient convnet architectures.
- Contrary to the prevailing view, there is a simple formula that relates latency and arithmetic complexity through computational efficiency.
- The authors developed a solution called block-fusion kernels that implement all layers of a residual block, improving efficiency.
Plain English Explanation
Convolutional neural networks (convnets) are a type of powerful machine learning model that excel at computer vision tasks. These models have made incredible progress in the last decade, allowing researchers to achieve results that were once unthinkable. However, the computational power required to run these models is a significant challenge. Researchers have explored ways to create more efficient convnet models that can produce accurate results without needing excessive computing resources.
The authors of this paper recognized that the traditional approach of focusing solely on reducing arithmetic complexity (the number of mathematical operations) was not enough. They discovered that there is a deeper relationship between latency (the time it takes to run the model) and arithmetic complexity, which they call "computational efficiency." By understanding this relationship, they were able to co-optimize both factors to create convnet models that are much faster to run while maintaining high accuracy.
The key insight was that the most efficient convnet layers tend to have low "operational intensity" - they use a lot of memory resources. To address this, the authors developed a new technique called "block-fusion kernels" that group related layers together in a way that improves memory usage and reduces communication overhead. This allowed them to create a model called ConvFirst that ran around 4 times faster than a baseline model on the ImageNet-1K image classification task, while maintaining the same level of accuracy.
This research builds on previous work on efficient neural network architectures and shows how a deeper understanding of the underlying computational principles can lead to significant practical improvements. The authors envision that this unified approach to convnet efficiency will enable a new era of high-accuracy, low-cost machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The core insight of this paper is that the traditional focus on minimizing arithmetic complexity (the number of mathematical operations) is not enough to achieve truly efficient convolutional neural networks (convnets). The authors observed that the convnet layers that provide the best accuracy-complexity trade-off also tend to have low "operational intensity" - they use a significant amount of memory resources.
To address this, the authors developed a technique called "block-fusion kernels" that implement all the layers within a residual block as a single, unified kernel. This creates temporal locality, avoids communication overhead, and reduces the overall workspace size. By co-optimizing both latency and arithmetic complexity through this approach, the authors were able to create a model called ConvFirst that ran approximately four times faster than a baseline ConvNeXt model on the ImageNet-1K image classification task, while maintaining the same level of accuracy.
The authors' unified approach to convnet efficiency builds on previous work on efficient neural network architectures, such as the use of implicit representations to build digital twins and the development of visual state-space models for remote sensing applications](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/rs3mamba-visual-state-space-model-remote-sensing). By understanding the deeper relationship between latency and arithmetic complexity, the authors were able to create a new class of convnet models and kernels that achieve greater accuracy at lower computational cost.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a compelling case for their approach to improving the efficiency of convolutional neural networks (convnets), which goes beyond the traditional focus on minimizing arithmetic complexity. By recognizing the importance of operational intensity and memory usage, the authors were able to develop a novel technique called block-fusion kernels that yielded significant performance improvements.
One potential limitation of the research is that it was evaluated primarily on the ImageNet-1K image classification task. While this is a widely-used benchmark, it would be interesting to see how the ConvFirst model performs on a broader range of computer vision tasks and datasets. Additionally, it would be valuable to understand how the block-fusion kernels compare to other efficient convnet architectures, such as those used in radar ghost object detection.
The authors also do not discuss the potential implications of their work beyond the technical details. It would be helpful to understand how this research could impact the development of real-world computer vision applications, particularly in domains where computational efficiency is crucial, such as autonomous vehicles or mobile robotics.
Overall, the authors have presented a thoughtful and innovative approach to improving the efficiency of convolutional neural networks. By shifting the focus to a more holistic understanding of computational efficiency, they have opened up new avenues for further research and development in this important field of machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to improving the efficiency of convolutional neural networks (convnets) that goes beyond the traditional focus on minimizing arithmetic complexity. By recognizing the importance of operational intensity and memory usage, the authors developed a technique called block-fusion kernels that group related layers together to improve computational efficiency.
The authors' unified approach to convnet efficiency enabled them to create a model called ConvFirst that ran approximately four times faster than a baseline ConvNeXt model on the ImageNet-1K image classification task, while maintaining the same level of accuracy. This research builds on previous work in efficient neural network architectures and has the potential to significantly impact the development of high-performance, low-cost computer vision models for a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
Which Transformer to Favor: A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency in Vision Transformers
Tobias Christian Nauen, Sebastian Palacio, Andreas Dengel
0
0
Transformers come with a high computational cost, yet their effectiveness in addressing problems in language and vision has sparked extensive research aimed at enhancing their efficiency. However, diverse experimental conditions, spanning multiple input domains, prevent a fair comparison based solely on reported results, posing challenges for model selection. To address this gap in comparability, we design a comprehensive benchmark of more than 30 models for image classification, evaluating key efficiency aspects, including accuracy, speed, and memory usage. This benchmark provides a standardized baseline across the landscape of efficiency-oriented transformers and our framework of analysis, based on Pareto optimality, reveals surprising insights. Despite claims of other models being more efficient, ViT remains Pareto optimal across multiple metrics. We observe that hybrid attention-CNN models exhibit remarkable inference memory- and parameter-efficiency. Moreover, our benchmark shows that using a larger model in general is more efficient than using higher resolution images. Thanks to our holistic evaluation, we provide a centralized resource for practitioners and researchers, facilitating informed decisions when selecting transformers or measuring progress of the development of efficient transformers.
4/15/2024
TabConv: Low-Computation CNN Inference via Table Lookups
Neelesh Gupta, Narayanan Kannan, Pengmiao Zhang, Viktor Prasanna
0
0
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have demonstrated remarkable ability throughout the field of computer vision. However, CNN inference requires a large number of arithmetic operations, making them expensive to deploy in hardware. Current approaches alleviate this issue by developing hardware-supported, algorithmic processes to simplify spatial convolution functions. However, these methods still heavily rely on matrix multiplication, leading to significant computational overhead. To bridge the gap between hardware, algorithmic acceleration, and approximate matrix multiplication, we propose TabConv, a novel, table-based approximation for convolution to significantly reduce arithmetic operations during inference. Additionally, we introduce a priority masking technique based on cosine similarity to select layers for table-based approximation, thereby maintaining the model performance. We evaluate our approach on popular CNNs: ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and NetworkInNetwork (NIN). TabConv preserves over 93% of the original model's performance while reducing arithmetic operations by 36.5%, 25.8%, and 99.4% for ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and MNIST, respectively, 35.6% and 99.3% for ResNet-34 on CIFAR-10 and MNIST, and 98.9% for NIN on MNIST, achieving low-computation inference.
4/10/2024
🧠
Using convolutional neural networks for the classification of breast cancer images
Eric Bonnet
0
0
An important part of breast cancer staging is the assessment of the sentinel axillary node for early signs of tumor spreading. However, this assessment by pathologists is not always easy and retrospective surveys often requalify the status of a high proportion of sentinel nodes. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a class of deep learning algorithms that have shown excellent performances in the most challenging visual classification tasks, with numerous applications in medical imaging. In this study I compare twelve different CNNs and different hardware acceleration devices for the detection of breast cancer from microscopic images of breast cancer tissue. Convolutional models are trained and tested on two public datasets. The first one is composed of more than 300,000 images of sentinel lymph node tissue from breast cancer patients, while the second one has more than 220,000 images from inductive breast carcinoma tissue, one of the most common forms of breast cancer. Four different hardware acceleration cards were used, with an off-the-shelf deep learning framework. The impact of transfer learning and hyperparameters fine-tuning are tested. Hardware acceleration device performance can improve training time by a factor of five to twelve, depending on the model used. On the other hand, increasing convolutional depth will augment the training time by a factor of four to six times, depending on the acceleration device used. Increasing the depth and the complexity of the model generally improves performance, but the relationship is not linear and also depends on the architecture of the model. The performance of transfer learning is always worse compared to a complete retraining of the model. Fine-tuning the hyperparameters of the model improves the results, with the best model showing a performance comparable to state-of-the-art models.
4/30/2024
👀
Vision Transformer Computation and Resilience for Dynamic Inference
Kavya Sreedhar, Jason Clemons, Rangharajan Venkatesan, Stephen W. Keckler, Mark Horowitz
0
0
State-of-the-art deep learning models for computer vision tasks are based on the transformer architecture and often deployed in real-time applications. In this scenario, the resources available for every inference can vary, so it is useful to be able to dynamically adapt execution to trade accuracy for efficiency. To create dynamic models, we leverage the resilience of vision transformers to pruning and switch between different scaled versions of a model. Surprisingly, we find that most FLOPs are generated by convolutions, not attention. These relative FLOP counts are not a good predictor of GPU performance since GPUs have special optimizations for convolutions. Some models are fairly resilient and their model execution can be adapted without retraining, while all models achieve better accuracy with retraining alternative execution paths. These insights mean that we can leverage CNN accelerators and these alternative execution paths to enable efficient and dynamic vision transformer inference. Our analysis shows that leveraging this type of dynamic execution can lead to saving 28% of energy with a 1.4% accuracy drop for SegFormer (63 GFLOPs), with no additional training, and 53% of energy for ResNet-50 (4 GFLOPs) with a 3.3% accuracy drop by switching between pretrained Once-For-All models.
4/17/2024