Efficient Convex Optimization Requires Superlinear Memory

Overview

• The paper shows that memory-constrained, first-order algorithms which minimize d-dimensional, 1-Lipschitz convex functions over the unit ball to 1/poly(d) accuracy using at most d^(1.25 - δ) bits of memory must make at least ~Ω(d^(1 + (4/3)δ)) first-order queries.
• This means the performance of such memory-constrained algorithms is a polynomial factor worse than the optimal ~O(d) query bound for this problem obtained by cutting plane methods that use ~O(d^2) memory.
• This resolves a COLT 2019 open problem posed by Woodworth and Srebro.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a particular type of optimization problem - minimizing d-dimensional, convex functions that are Lipschitz continuous (meaning they don't change too quickly) over a unit ball, to a high level of accuracy. It compares the performance of two different approaches to solving this problem:

1. Memory-Constrained Algorithms - These algorithms are limited in the amount of memory they can use, only allowing up to d^(1.25 - δ) bits.
2. Cutting Plane Methods - These more powerful algorithms can use up to ~O(d^2) memory.

The key finding is that the memory-constrained algorithms must make a significantly larger number of first-order queries (at least ~Ω(d^(1 + (4/3)δ))) to achieve the same level of accuracy as the cutting plane methods, which only need ~O(d) queries.

In other words, the memory-constrained algorithms perform much worse than the optimal approach, with the gap growing as the memory constraint gets tighter (smaller δ). This resolves an open problem posed at a previous COLT conference.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the query complexity (number of first-order queries required) for minimizing d-dimensional, 1-Lipschitz convex functions over the unit ball to 1/poly(d) accuracy, under the constraint of using at most d^(1.25 - δ) bits of memory.

The authors prove that any memory-constrained, first-order algorithm for this problem must make at least ~Ω(d^(1 + (4/3)δ)) first-order queries. This is a polynomial factor worse than the optimal ~O(d) query bound achievable by cutting plane methods that use ~O(d^2) memory, as shown in prior work.

The key technical steps are:

1. Defining a family of hard problem instances based on the Chebyshev polynomial.
2. Showing that any memory-constrained algorithm must make a large number of queries to solve these instances.
3. Relating the query complexity lower bound to the optimal query complexity for the overall problem.

The results resolve an open problem posed at COLT 2019 by Woodworth and Srebro, demonstrating fundamental limitations of memory-constrained optimization algorithms compared to less memory-constrained approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong negative result, showing that memory-constrained first-order algorithms are inherently limited in their ability to efficiently minimize convex functions, compared to less constrained methods. This has important implications for the design of optimization algorithms, particularly in resource-limited settings.

However, the paper focuses only on a specific class of convex functions over the unit ball. It would be valuable to understand if similar lower bounds hold for broader function classes or different constraint sets. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential workarounds or alternative approaches that could overcome the memory limitations.

Further research is needed to fully characterize the tradeoffs between memory, query complexity, and optimization performance in a range of settings. Exploring these tradeoffs could lead to the development of more efficient algorithms or guide the allocation of computational resources in practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper establishes a fundamental limitation of memory-constrained, first-order optimization algorithms for minimizing convex functions. It shows that such algorithms must make a significantly larger number of queries compared to less memory-constrained approaches, like cutting plane methods.

These results have important implications for the design of optimization algorithms, particularly in resource-limited settings such as machine learning on embedded devices or large-scale distributed optimization. The findings suggest that investing in additional memory resources can lead to substantial improvements in optimization performance, resolving an open problem from the COLT 2019 conference.

While the paper focuses on a specific class of convex functions, the insights could inspire further research into the tradeoffs between memory, computational complexity, and optimization performance in a broader range of settings, ultimately leading to more efficient and practical optimization algorithms.