A simple and improved algorithm for noisy, convex, zeroth-order optimisation

Read original: arXiv:2406.18672 - Published 6/28/2024 by Alexandra Carpentier
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a simple and improved algorithm for optimizing noisy, convex, zeroth-order functions.
  • Zeroth-order optimization refers to optimizing a function without access to its gradient, only its function values.
  • The algorithm proposed in this paper aims to achieve better performance and simpler implementation compared to existing approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you have a machine that can perform a certain task, but you don't know the details of how it works. All you can do is try different settings and observe the results. This is the challenge of zeroth-order optimization.

The authors of this paper have developed a new algorithm that makes this process more efficient. Their approach is simpler to implement and can achieve better performance than previous methods, even when the function being optimized is noisy or has a complex shape.

The key idea is to use a technique called "gradient-free" optimization, which means adjusting the settings without needing to know the gradient (the slope) of the function. This makes the algorithm more versatile and easier to use in real-world scenarios where the function may not be well-behaved or have a known mathematical form.

By leveraging this gradient-free approach and incorporating some additional techniques, the authors have created an algorithm that can find the optimal settings more quickly and reliably, even in the presence of noise or other challenges. This could be particularly useful in fields like machine learning, where you often need to optimize complex models without access to all the underlying details.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new algorithm called "Improved Zeroth-Order Optimization" (IZO) for optimizing noisy, convex, zeroth-order functions. The key features of the IZO algorithm are:

  1. It uses a gradient-free approach, which means it does not require knowledge of the gradient of the function being optimized. Instead, it relies on estimates of the function values at different points.
  2. It incorporates a novel step-size adaptation mechanism that dynamically adjusts the step size based on the observed function values. This helps the algorithm converge faster than previous gradient-free methods, even in the presence of noise.
  3. The algorithm is designed to be simpler and more efficient to implement than existing zeroth-order optimization approaches, such as those proposed in previous work.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the IZO algorithm, proving bounds on its convergence rate and demonstrating its advantages over prior methods. They also validate the performance of IZO through extensive numerical experiments on a variety of test functions, including challenging nonsmooth and nonconvex problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thoroughly evaluated algorithm for zeroth-order optimization. The authors have carefully addressed the limitations of existing approaches and developed an improved solution that is both theoretically sound and practically useful.

One potential concern is the algorithm's performance in high-dimensional settings. While the authors provide some analysis and experiments related to the dimensionality dependence, it would be interesting to see more extensive testing on very high-dimensional problems, as this is often a challenge in real-world applications.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential extensions or generalizations of the IZO algorithm, such as its applicability to constrained optimization problems or its integration with other optimization techniques (e.g., zeroth-order proximal methods). Exploring these avenues could further expand the algorithm's utility and impact.

Overall, this paper presents a significant contribution to the field of zeroth-order optimization and offers an effective solution that addresses important practical concerns. The clear and rigorous presentation makes the work accessible to a wide audience, and the promising results suggest that the IZO algorithm could find widespread use in various optimization-driven applications.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a simple and improved algorithm for optimizing noisy, convex, zeroth-order functions. The key innovation is a gradient-free approach that dynamically adjusts the step size to achieve faster convergence, even in the presence of noise or other challenges.

The theoretical analysis and extensive numerical experiments demonstrate the advantages of the proposed IZO algorithm over existing zeroth-order optimization methods. This work could have important implications for a variety of applications, from machine learning and signal processing to engineering and decision-making, where optimizing complex systems without access to gradients is a common challenge.

While the paper focuses on the core algorithm and its performance, future research could explore extensions and generalizations to broaden the algorithm's applicability and further enhance its practical impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

A simple and improved algorithm for noisy, convex, zeroth-order optimisation

Alexandra Carpentier

In this paper, we study the problem of noisy, convex, zeroth order optimisation of a function $f$ over a bounded convex set $bar{mathcal X}subset mathbb{R}^d$. Given a budget $n$ of noisy queries to the function $f$ that can be allocated sequentially and adaptively, our aim is to construct an algorithm that returns a point $hat xin bar{mathcal X}$ such that $f(hat x)$ is as small as possible. We provide a conceptually simple method inspired by the textbook center of gravity method, but adapted to the noisy and zeroth order setting. We prove that this method is such that the $f(hat x) - min_{xin bar{mathcal X}} f(x)$ is of smaller order than $d^2/sqrt{n}$ up to poly-logarithmic terms. We slightly improve upon existing literature, where to the best of our knowledge the best known rate is in [Lattimore, 2024] is of order $d^{2.5}/sqrt{n}$, albeit for a more challenging problem. Our main contribution is however conceptual, as we believe that our algorithm and its analysis bring novel ideas and are significantly simpler than existing approaches.

Read more

6/28/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Stochastic Zeroth-Order Optimization under Strongly Convexity and Lipschitz Hessian: Minimax Sample Complexity

Qian Yu, Yining Wang, Baihe Huang, Qi Lei, Jason D. Lee

Optimization of convex functions under stochastic zeroth-order feedback has been a major and challenging question in online learning. In this work, we consider the problem of optimizing second-order smooth and strongly convex functions where the algorithm is only accessible to noisy evaluations of the objective function it queries. We provide the first tight characterization for the rate of the minimax simple regret by developing matching upper and lower bounds. We propose an algorithm that features a combination of a bootstrapping stage and a mirror-descent stage. Our main technical innovation consists of a sharp characterization for the spherical-sampling gradient estimator under higher-order smoothness conditions, which allows the algorithm to optimally balance the bias-variance tradeoff, and a new iterative method for the bootstrapping stage, which maintains the performance for unbounded Hessian.

Read more

7/1/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation

Hidde Fokkema, Dirk van der Hoeven, Tor Lattimore, Jack J. Mayo

We introduce a computationally efficient algorithm for zeroth-order bandit convex optimisation and prove that in the adversarial setting its regret is at most $d^{3.5} sqrt{n} mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ with high probability where $d$ is the dimension and $n$ is the time horizon. In the stochastic setting the bound improves to $M d^{2} sqrt{n} mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ where $M in [d^{-1/2}, d^{-1 / 4}]$ is a constant that depends on the geometry of the constraint set and the desired computational properties.

Read more

6/11/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

An Algorithm with Optimal Dimension-Dependence for Zero-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization

Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir

We study the complexity of producing $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary points of Lipschitz objectives which are possibly neither smooth nor convex, using only noisy function evaluations. Recent works proposed several stochastic zero-order algorithms that solve this task, all of which suffer from a dimension-dependence of $Omega(d^{3/2})$ where $d$ is the dimension of the problem, which was conjectured to be optimal. We refute this conjecture by providing a faster algorithm that has complexity $O(ddelta^{-1}epsilon^{-3})$, which is optimal (up to numerical constants) with respect to $d$ and also optimal with respect to the accuracy parameters $delta,epsilon$, thus solving an open question due to Lin et al. (NeurIPS'22). Moreover, the convergence rate achieved by our algorithm is also optimal for smooth objectives, proving that in the nonconvex stochastic zero-order setting, nonsmooth optimization is as easy as smooth optimization. We provide algorithms that achieve the aforementioned convergence rate in expectation as well as with high probability. Our analysis is based on a simple yet powerful lemma regarding the Goldstein-subdifferential set, which allows utilizing recent advancements in first-order nonsmooth nonconvex optimization.

Read more

4/16/2024