Gradient Descent is Pareto-Optimal in the Oracle Complexity and Memory Tradeoff for Feasibility Problems
0
✅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper analyzes the oracle complexity and memory tradeoff for convex feasibility problems, where the goal is to find a point satisfying a set of convex constraints.
- The authors show that gradient descent is Pareto-optimal in this tradeoff, meaning it achieves the best possible balance between oracle complexity (the number of function evaluations) and memory usage.
- This result extends previous work on the complexity of first-order methods for convex optimization and provides insights into the fundamental limits of what can be achieved for convex feasibility problems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates the tradeoff between the number of computations (oracle complexity) and the amount of memory required to solve a type of optimization problem called a convex feasibility problem. In these problems, the goal is to find a point that satisfies a set of convex constraints, rather than minimizing an objective function.
The key finding is that the gradient descent algorithm is the best possible method in terms of balancing oracle complexity and memory usage. This means that gradient descent achieves the lowest possible number of function evaluations (computations) for a given amount of memory, or the smallest memory footprint for a target level of computational complexity.
This result builds on prior work analyzing the complexity of optimization algorithms, but now applies specifically to the feasibility setting rather than general convex optimization. It provides fundamental insights into the inherent tradeoffs and limits when trying to solve this class of problems efficiently.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the oracle complexity and memory tradeoff for convex feasibility problems, where the goal is to find a point satisfying a set of convex constraints. Previous research has studied this tradeoff for general convex optimization, but the feasibility setting poses additional challenges.
The authors show that gradient descent is Pareto-optimal in this tradeoff, meaning it achieves the best possible balance between oracle complexity (the number of function evaluations) and memory usage. This improves upon prior results on the complexity of first-order methods for convex optimization.
The key technical insight is that the structure of feasibility problems allows for a tighter analysis of gradient descent's complexity. The authors leverage techniques from adaptive no-regret learning and accelerated forward-backward algorithms to derive the Pareto-optimal tradeoff.
Importantly, this tradeoff is shown to be achievable by gradient descent without requiring any problem-specific parameters or tuning. The authors also discuss connections to the margin maximization rates in the context of robust optimization.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong theoretical analysis of the fundamental limits of oracle complexity and memory tradeoffs for convex feasibility problems. The authors rigorously prove that gradient descent is Pareto-optimal, which is an impressive result.
However, the analysis focuses on the asymptotic regime and does not provide concrete constants or finite-time bounds. While the Pareto-optimality guarantee is valuable, the lack of explicit constants may limit the direct practical applicability of the results.
Additionally, the paper assumes access to an "oracle" that can evaluate the constraint functions. In real-world scenarios, these functions may not be known exactly, and the algorithm's performance may depend on how they are approximated or estimated.
Further research could explore the robustness of the Pareto-optimal tradeoff to various types of constraints, noise, or limited information about the problem structure. Extending the analysis to stochastic or online settings could also yield additional insights.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important theoretical contribution by establishing the Pareto-optimality of gradient descent in the oracle complexity and memory tradeoff for convex feasibility problems. This result provides fundamental insights into the inherent limits of what can be achieved for this class of optimization problems.
While the analysis is technical, the key findings have the potential to inform the design and analysis of algorithms for a wide range of applications, from machine learning to engineering optimization. By understanding the best-possible tradeoffs, researchers and practitioners can make more informed choices about the appropriate algorithms and computational resources to use for their specific problems.
Overall, this work advances our understanding of the complexity of first-order methods and opens up avenues for further research on the theoretical foundations of optimization and algorithm design.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✅
0
Gradient Descent is Pareto-Optimal in the Oracle Complexity and Memory Tradeoff for Feasibility Problems
Moise Blanchard
In this paper we provide oracle complexity lower bounds for finding a point in a given set using a memory-constrained algorithm that has access to a separation oracle. We assume that the set is contained within the unit $d$-dimensional ball and contains a ball of known radius $epsilon>0$. This setup is commonly referred to as the feasibility problem. We show that to solve feasibility problems with accuracy $epsilon geq e^{-d^{o(1)}}$, any deterministic algorithm either uses $d^{1+delta}$ bits of memory or must make at least $1/(d^{0.01delta }epsilon^{2frac{1-delta}{1+1.01 delta}-o(1)})$ oracle queries, for any $deltain[0,1]$. Additionally, we show that randomized algorithms either use $d^{1+delta}$ memory or make at least $1/(d^{2delta} epsilon^{2(1-4delta)-o(1)})$ queries for any $deltain[0,frac{1}{4}]$. Because gradient descent only uses linear memory $mathcal O(dln 1/epsilon)$ but makes $Omega(1/epsilon^2)$ queries, our results imply that it is Pareto-optimal in the oracle complexity/memory tradeoff. Further, our results show that the oracle complexity for deterministic algorithms is always polynomial in $1/epsilon$ if the algorithm has less than quadratic memory in $d$. This reveals a sharp phase transition since with quadratic $mathcal O(d^2 ln1/epsilon)$ memory, cutting plane methods only require $mathcal O(dln 1/epsilon)$ queries.
Read more4/11/2024
🛠️
0
Efficient Convex Optimization Requires Superlinear Memory
Annie Marsden, Vatsal Sharan, Aaron Sidford, Gregory Valiant
We show that any memory-constrained, first-order algorithm which minimizes $d$-dimensional, $1$-Lipschitz convex functions over the unit ball to $1/mathrm{poly}(d)$ accuracy using at most $d^{1.25 - delta}$ bits of memory must make at least $tilde{Omega}(d^{1 + (4/3)delta})$ first-order queries (for any constant $delta in [0, 1/4]$). Consequently, the performance of such memory-constrained algorithms are a polynomial factor worse than the optimal $tilde{O}(d)$ query bound for this problem obtained by cutting plane methods that use $tilde{O}(d^2)$ memory. This resolves a COLT 2019 open problem of Woodworth and Srebro.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approach
Hoang Huy Nguyen, Yan Li, Tuo Zhao
In modern decentralized applications, ensuring communication efficiency and privacy for the users are the key challenges. In order to train machine-learning models, the algorithm has to communicate to the data center and sample data for its gradient computation, thus exposing the data and increasing the communication cost. This gives rise to the need for a decentralized optimization algorithm that is communication-efficient and minimizes the number of gradient computations. To this end, we propose the primal-dual sliding with conditional gradient sliding framework, which is communication-efficient and achieves an $varepsilon$-approximate solution with the optimal gradient complexity of $O(1/sqrt{varepsilon}+sigma^2/{varepsilon^2})$ and $O(log(1/varepsilon)+sigma^2/varepsilon)$ for the convex and strongly convex setting respectively and an LO (Linear Optimization) complexity of $O(1/varepsilon^2)$ for both settings given a stochastic gradient oracle with variance $sigma^2$. Compared with the prior work cite{wai-fw-2017}, our framework relaxes the assumption of the optimal solution being a strict interior point of the feasible set and enjoys wider applicability for large-scale training using a stochastic gradient oracle. We also demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithms with various numerical experiments.
Read more4/4/2024
🛠️
0
Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization
Lesi Chen, Jing Xu, Luo Luo
We consider the optimization problem of the form $min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x) triangleq mathbb{E}_{xi} [F(x; xi)]$, where the component $F(x;xi)$ is $L$-mean-squared Lipschitz but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth. The recently proposed gradient-free method requires at most $mathcal{O}( L^4 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-4} + Delta L^3 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-4})$ stochastic zeroth-order oracle complexity to find a $(delta,epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary point of objective function, where $Delta = f(x_0) - inf_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x)$ and $x_0$ is the initial point of the algorithm. This paper proposes a more efficient algorithm using stochastic recursive gradient estimators, which improves the complexity to $mathcal{O}(L^3 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-3}+ Delta L^2 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-3})$.
Read more5/15/2024