Efficient Detection of Toxic Prompts in Large Language Models
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini have significantly advanced natural language processing.
- These models can be exploited by malicious individuals who craft toxic prompts to elicit harmful or unethical responses.
- Existing detection techniques face challenges related to the diversity of toxic prompts, scalability, and computational efficiency.
- The paper proposes ToxicDetector, a lightweight greybox method for efficiently detecting toxic prompts in LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Powerful language models like ChatGPT have greatly improved how computers can understand and generate human-like text. However, these models can also be misused by bad actors who create harmful or unethical prompts to get the models to produce toxic responses. Existing methods for detecting these toxic prompts have struggled to keep up with the wide variety of prompts, and they can be slow and resource-intensive.
To address these issues, the researchers developed ToxicDetector, a new approach that uses the language models themselves to efficiently identify toxic prompts. ToxicDetector creates its own set of example toxic prompts, converts them into numerical vectors, and then trains a machine learning classifier to quickly spot toxic prompts in real-time. The researchers tested ToxicDetector on various language models and found that it achieves high accuracy while being very fast and lightweight, making it well-suited for practical applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes ToxicDetector, a greybox method for efficiently detecting toxic prompts in large language models (LLMs). Greybox methods leverage both whitebox (internal model information) and blackbox (input-output behavior) approaches.
ToxicDetector's key components are:
- Toxic Concept Prompts: The system generates a set of toxic concept prompts using the target LLM to create a diverse set of examples.
- Feature Extraction: ToxicDetector extracts embedding vectors from the toxic and non-toxic prompts to form feature vectors.
- Classification: A Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier is trained on the feature vectors to classify prompts as toxic or non-toxic.
The researchers evaluated ToxicDetector on various versions of the LLaMA models, Gemma-2, and multiple datasets. ToxicDetector achieved an impressive accuracy of 96.39% and a low false positive rate of 2.00%, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, ToxicDetector's processing time of 0.0780 seconds per prompt makes it highly suitable for real-time applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of ToxicDetector's performance, including comparisons to existing methods. However, the authors acknowledge that their approach may not generalize well to prompts that are semantically or linguistically distant from the toxic concept prompts used for training.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or limitations in the datasets used for evaluation. The diversity and representativeness of the training data could impact ToxicDetector's performance in real-world scenarios.
Further research could explore techniques to expand the coverage of toxic prompts, such as using adversarial examples or transfer learning from other domains. Investigating the interpretability of ToxicDetector's classification decisions could also provide valuable insights into the model's inner workings and potential failure modes.
Conclusion
The paper introduces ToxicDetector, a lightweight and efficient method for detecting toxic prompts in large language models. ToxicDetector leverages the language models themselves to generate diverse examples of toxic prompts, which are then used to train a fast and accurate classifier.
The evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of ToxicDetector, which outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy, false positive rate, and computational efficiency. This makes ToxicDetector a practical and scalable solution for real-time toxic prompt detection in large language models, a crucial step in ensuring the safe and ethical deployment of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
Efficient Detection of Toxic Prompts in Large Language Models
Yi Liu, Junzhe Yu, Huijia Sun, Ling Shi, Gelei Deng, Yuqi Chen, Yang Liu
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini have significantly advanced natural language processing, enabling various applications such as chatbots and automated content generation. However, these models can be exploited by malicious individuals who craft toxic prompts to elicit harmful or unethical responses. These individuals often employ jailbreaking techniques to bypass safety mechanisms, highlighting the need for robust toxic prompt detection methods. Existing detection techniques, both blackbox and whitebox, face challenges related to the diversity of toxic prompts, scalability, and computational efficiency. In response, we propose ToxicDetector, a lightweight greybox method designed to efficiently detect toxic prompts in LLMs. ToxicDetector leverages LLMs to create toxic concept prompts, uses embedding vectors to form feature vectors, and employs a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier for prompt classification. Our evaluation on various versions of the LLama models, Gemma-2, and multiple datasets demonstrates that ToxicDetector achieves a high accuracy of 96.39% and a low false positive rate of 2.00%, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, ToxicDetector's processing time of 0.0780 seconds per prompt makes it highly suitable for real-time applications. ToxicDetector achieves high accuracy, efficiency, and scalability, making it a practical method for toxic prompt detection in LLMs.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Toxicity Detection for Free
Zhanhao Hu, Julien Piet, Geng Zhao, Jiantao Jiao, David Wagner
Current LLMs are generally aligned to follow safety requirements and tend to refuse toxic prompts. However, LLMs can fail to refuse toxic prompts or be overcautious and refuse benign examples. In addition, state-of-the-art toxicity detectors have low TPRs at low FPR, incurring high costs in real-world applications where toxic examples are rare. In this paper, we explore Moderation Using LLM Introspection (MULI), which detects toxic prompts using the information extracted directly from LLMs themselves. We found significant gaps between benign and toxic prompts in the distribution of alternative refusal responses and in the distribution of the first response token's logits. These gaps can be used to detect toxicities: We show that a toy model based on the logits of specific starting tokens gets reliable performance, while requiring no training or additional computational cost. We build a more robust detector using a sparse logistic regression model on the first response token logits, which greatly exceeds SOTA detectors under multiple metrics.
Read more5/30/2024
0
ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts
Amelia F. Hardy, Houjun Liu, Bernard Lange, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Typical schemes for automated red-teaming large language models (LLMs) focus on discovering prompts that trigger a frozen language model (the defender) to generate toxic text. This often results in the prompting model (the adversary) producing text that is unintelligible and unlikely to arise. Here, we propose a reinforcement learning formulation of the LLM red-teaming task which allows us to discover prompts that both (1) trigger toxic outputs from a frozen defender and (2) have low perplexity as scored by the defender. We argue these cases are most pertinent in a red-teaming setting because of their likelihood to arise during normal use of the defender model. We solve this formulation through a novel online and weakly supervised variant of Identity Preference Optimization (IPO) on GPT-2 and GPT-2 XL defenders. We demonstrate that our policy is capable of generating likely prompts that also trigger toxicity. Finally, we qualitatively analyze learned strategies, trade-offs of likelihood and toxicity, and discuss implications. Source code is available for this project at: https://github.com/sisl/ASTPrompter/.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models
Tinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu Nguyen
Large language models (LLMs) have become integral to our professional workflows and daily lives. Nevertheless, these machine companions of ours have a critical flaw: the huge amount of data which endows them with vast and diverse knowledge, also exposes them to the inevitable toxicity and bias. While most LLMs incorporate defense mechanisms to prevent the generation of harmful content, these safeguards can be easily bypassed with minimal prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce the new Thoroughly Engineered Toxicity (TET) dataset, comprising manually crafted prompts designed to nullify the protective layers of such models. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the pivotal role of TET in providing a rigorous benchmark for evaluation of toxicity awareness in several popular LLMs: it highlights the toxicity in the LLMs that might remain hidden when using normal prompts, thus revealing subtler issues in their behavior.
Read more5/21/2024