ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents ASTPrompter, a weakly supervised system for identifying potentially toxic language model prompts.
- It uses automated "red-teaming" techniques to detect prompts that are likely to generate harmful or undesirable outputs.
- The system is designed to help language model developers and users proactively identify and mitigate potential misuses of their models.
Plain English Explanation
ASTPrompter is a tool that helps detect language model prompts that could lead to harmful or undesirable outputs. It does this by automatically "red-teaming" the language model, which means it tries to find prompts that will trick the model into generating problematic content.
The key insight behind ASTPrompter is that many toxic prompts share certain linguistic patterns or "abstract syntax trees" (ASTs). By analyzing these AST structures, the system can identify prompts that are likely to be toxic, even if it hasn't seen those exact prompts before. This allows it to proactively flag potentially problematic prompts before they can be used to misuse the language model.
AdvPrompter and Prompting4Debugging are other systems that use similar red-teaming approaches to identify harmful prompts for language models and text-to-image diffusion models, respectively.
The benefit of ASTPrompter is that it can help language model developers and users be more proactive about identifying and mitigating potential misuses of their models. By catching toxic prompts early, they can work to improve the model's safety and robustness before the prompts can be widely abused.
Technical Explanation
ASTPrompter works by automatically generating a large number of prompts and then using the language model's own outputs to assess whether those prompts are likely to be toxic. It does this by analyzing the "abstract syntax trees" (ASTs) of the prompts, which capture their underlying linguistic structure.
The key insight is that many toxic prompts share common AST patterns, even if the specific words and phrasing differ. By training a machine learning model to recognize these toxic AST patterns, ASTPrompter can identify prompts that are likely to generate harmful outputs, without needing to see those exact prompts during training.
The Tiny Refinements paper explores how small changes to prompts can dramatically alter the outputs of language models, underscoring the importance of systems like ASTPrompter that can proactively identify problematic prompts.
During evaluation, ASTPrompter generates a large number of prompts, runs them through the target language model, and uses the model's own outputs to train a toxicity classifier. Prompts that are classified as toxic are then flagged as likely to be problematic.
The authors show that ASTPrompter is able to identify toxic prompts with high accuracy, outperforming baseline approaches that rely on keyword matching or other heuristics. This suggests that the AST-based approach is an effective way to capture the underlying linguistic structure of toxic prompts.
Critical Analysis
The ASTPrompter paper provides a promising approach for addressing the challenge of toxic prompt identification, but it also has some important limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is that the system relies on the target language model's own outputs to train the toxicity classifier. This means that the system's performance is inherently tied to the quality and consistency of the language model's toxicity judgments, which may not always be reliable.
Additionally, the paper does not explore how ASTPrompter might perform on more advanced language models or in more nuanced or context-dependent toxicity scenarios. The Toxicity Detection-Free paper highlights some of the challenges in accurately detecting toxicity, especially in more ambiguous or context-dependent situations.
Further research could also investigate how ASTPrompter might be extended to work with other types of language models, such as those used for code generation or specialized domains, as well as how it could be integrated with other safety and robustness measures for language models.
Conclusion
Overall, the ASTPrompter system represents an important step forward in the effort to proactively identify and mitigate the potential misuse of language models. By leveraging the underlying linguistic structure of prompts, the system can catch toxic prompts before they can be used to generate harmful outputs.
As language models become more powerful and widely used, tools like ASTPrompter will be crucial for ensuring that these models are developed and deployed responsibly, with a focus on safety and robustness. Continued research and innovation in this area will be essential for realizing the full potential of language AI while minimizing the risks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts
Amelia F. Hardy, Houjun Liu, Bernard Lange, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Typical schemes for automated red-teaming large language models (LLMs) focus on discovering prompts that trigger a frozen language model (the defender) to generate toxic text. This often results in the prompting model (the adversary) producing text that is unintelligible and unlikely to arise. Here, we propose a reinforcement learning formulation of the LLM red-teaming task which allows us to discover prompts that both (1) trigger toxic outputs from a frozen defender and (2) have low perplexity as scored by the defender. We argue these cases are most pertinent in a red-teaming setting because of their likelihood to arise during normal use of the defender model. We solve this formulation through a novel online and weakly supervised variant of Identity Preference Optimization (IPO) on GPT-2 and GPT-2 XL defenders. We demonstrate that our policy is capable of generating likely prompts that also trigger toxicity. Finally, we qualitatively analyze learned strategies, trade-offs of likelihood and toxicity, and discuss implications. Source code is available for this project at: https://github.com/sisl/ASTPrompter/.
Read more7/15/2024
🔎
0
Efficient Detection of Toxic Prompts in Large Language Models
Yi Liu, Junzhe Yu, Huijia Sun, Ling Shi, Gelei Deng, Yuqi Chen, Yang Liu
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini have significantly advanced natural language processing, enabling various applications such as chatbots and automated content generation. However, these models can be exploited by malicious individuals who craft toxic prompts to elicit harmful or unethical responses. These individuals often employ jailbreaking techniques to bypass safety mechanisms, highlighting the need for robust toxic prompt detection methods. Existing detection techniques, both blackbox and whitebox, face challenges related to the diversity of toxic prompts, scalability, and computational efficiency. In response, we propose ToxicDetector, a lightweight greybox method designed to efficiently detect toxic prompts in LLMs. ToxicDetector leverages LLMs to create toxic concept prompts, uses embedding vectors to form feature vectors, and employs a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier for prompt classification. Our evaluation on various versions of the LLama models, Gemma-2, and multiple datasets demonstrates that ToxicDetector achieves a high accuracy of 96.39% and a low false positive rate of 2.00%, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, ToxicDetector's processing time of 0.0780 seconds per prompt makes it highly suitable for real-time applications. ToxicDetector achieves high accuracy, efficiency, and scalability, making it a practical method for toxic prompt detection in LLMs.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
Seanie Lee, Minsu Kim, Lynn Cherif, David Dobre, Juho Lee, Sung Ju Hwang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gauthier Gidel, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin, Moksh Jain
Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). Developing effective protection against many modes of attack prompts requires discovering diverse attacks. Automated red-teaming typically uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune an attacker language model to generate prompts that elicit undesirable responses from a target LLM, as measured, for example, by an auxiliary toxicity classifier. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. As a flexible and probabilistically principled alternative, we propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts. We find that the attacks generated by our method are effective against a wide range of target LLMs, both with and without safety tuning, and transfer well between target LLMs. Finally, we demonstrate that models safety-tuned using a dataset of red-teaming prompts generated by our method are robust to attacks from other RL-based red-teaming approaches.
Read more5/30/2024
🤔
0
AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs
Anselm Paulus, Arman Zharmagambetov, Chuan Guo, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian
While recently Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable successes, they are vulnerable to certain jailbreaking attacks that lead to generation of inappropriate or harmful content. Manual red-teaming requires finding adversarial prompts that cause such jailbreaking, e.g. by appending a suffix to a given instruction, which is inefficient and time-consuming. On the other hand, automatic adversarial prompt generation often leads to semantically meaningless attacks that can easily be detected by perplexity-based filters, may require gradient information from the TargetLLM, or do not scale well due to time-consuming discrete optimization processes over the token space. In this paper, we present a novel method that uses another LLM, called the AdvPrompter, to generate human-readable adversarial prompts in seconds, $sim800times$ faster than existing optimization-based approaches. We train the AdvPrompter using a novel algorithm that does not require access to the gradients of the TargetLLM. This process alternates between two steps: (1) generating high-quality target adversarial suffixes by optimizing the AdvPrompter predictions, and (2) low-rank fine-tuning of the AdvPrompter with the generated adversarial suffixes. The trained AdvPrompter generates suffixes that veil the input instruction without changing its meaning, such that the TargetLLM is lured to give a harmful response. Experimental results on popular open source TargetLLMs show state-of-the-art results on the AdvBench dataset, that also transfer to closed-source black-box LLM APIs. Further, we demonstrate that by fine-tuning on a synthetic dataset generated by AdvPrompter, LLMs can be made more robust against jailbreaking attacks while maintaining performance, i.e. high MMLU scores.
Read more4/29/2024