Efficient and Effective Model Extraction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines techniques for efficiently and effectively extracting models from existing AI systems
- Addresses challenges around functionality stealing and data-free knowledge transfer
- Proposes novel methods to extract models in a more realistic and effective manner
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores techniques for efficiently and effectively extracting models from existing AI systems. This is an important problem, as it can lead to functionality stealing and data-free knowledge transfer.
The researchers propose novel methods to extract models in a more realistic and effective manner. This is crucial, as previous techniques have been limited in their ability to accurately capture the functionality of the original model.
The paper examines how small models can still be effective in cross-domain settings, demonstrating the potential for efficient model extraction.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents several techniques for extracting models from existing AI systems. This includes methods for functionality stealing and data-free knowledge transfer.
The researchers propose novel approaches that extract models in a more realistic and effective manner. This involves techniques that can more accurately capture the functionality of the original model, going beyond the limitations of previous methods.
The paper also examines how small models can still be effective in cross-domain settings. This has important implications for the efficiency of model extraction, as smaller models are generally less resource-intensive to train and deploy.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges certain caveats and limitations of the proposed techniques. For example, the researchers note that the extraction methods may not fully capture all the nuances and complexities of the original model.
Additionally, the potential for misuse and unintended consequences of these model extraction techniques is an important consideration that deserves further exploration and discussion.
Conclusion
This paper presents novel techniques for efficiently and effectively extracting models from existing AI systems. The proposed methods address challenges around functionality stealing and data-free knowledge transfer, enabling more realistic and effective model extraction.
The findings suggest that small models can still be effective in cross-domain settings, highlighting the potential for efficient model extraction. However, the potential risks and limitations of these techniques must be carefully considered.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Efficient and Effective Model Extraction
Hongyu Zhu, Wentao Hu, Sichu Liang, Fangqi Li, Wenwen Wang, Shilin Wang
Model extraction aims to create a functionally similar copy from a machine learning as a service (MLaaS) API with minimal overhead, typically for illicit profit or as a precursor to further attacks, posing a significant threat to the MLaaS ecosystem. However, recent studies have shown that model extraction is highly inefficient, particularly when the target task distribution is unavailable. In such cases, even substantially increasing the attack budget fails to produce a sufficiently similar replica, reducing the adversary's motivation to pursue extraction attacks. In this paper, we revisit the elementary design choices throughout the extraction lifecycle. We propose an embarrassingly simple yet dramatically effective algorithm, Efficient and Effective Model Extraction (E3), focusing on both query preparation and training routine. E3 achieves superior generalization compared to state-of-the-art methods while minimizing computational costs. For instance, with only 0.005 times the query budget and less than 0.2 times the runtime, E3 outperforms classical generative model based data-free model extraction by an absolute accuracy improvement of over 50% on CIFAR-10. Our findings underscore the persistent threat posed by model extraction and suggest that it could serve as a valuable benchmarking algorithm for future security evaluations.
Read more9/25/2024
0
CaBaGe: Data-Free Model Extraction using ClAss BAlanced Generator Ensemble
Jonathan Rosenthal, Shanchao Liang, Kevin Zhang, Lin Tan
Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) is often provided as a pay-per-query, black-box system to clients. Such a black-box approach not only hinders open replication, validation, and interpretation of model results, but also makes it harder for white-hat researchers to identify vulnerabilities in the MLaaS systems. Model extraction is a promising technique to address these challenges by reverse-engineering black-box models. Since training data is typically unavailable for MLaaS models, this paper focuses on the realistic version of it: data-free model extraction. We propose a data-free model extraction approach, CaBaGe, to achieve higher model extraction accuracy with a small number of queries. Our innovations include (1) a novel experience replay for focusing on difficult training samples; (2) an ensemble of generators for steadily producing diverse synthetic data; and (3) a selective filtering process for querying the victim model with harder, more balanced samples. In addition, we create a more realistic setting, for the first time, where the attacker has no knowledge of the number of classes in the victim training data, and create a solution to learn the number of classes on the fly. Our evaluation shows that CaBaGe outperforms existing techniques on seven datasets -- MNIST, FMNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet-subset, and Tiny ImageNet -- with an accuracy improvement of the extracted models by up to 43.13%. Furthermore, the number of queries required to extract a clone model matching the final accuracy of prior work is reduced by up to 75.7%.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Beyond Labeling Oracles: What does it mean to steal ML models?
Avital Shafran, Ilia Shumailov, Murat A. Erdogdu, Nicolas Papernot
Model extraction attacks are designed to steal trained models with only query access, as is often provided through APIs that ML-as-a-Service providers offer. Machine Learning (ML) models are expensive to train, in part because data is hard to obtain, and a primary incentive for model extraction is to acquire a model while incurring less cost than training from scratch. Literature on model extraction commonly claims or presumes that the attacker is able to save on both data acquisition and labeling costs. We thoroughly evaluate this assumption and find that the attacker often does not. This is because current attacks implicitly rely on the adversary being able to sample from the victim model's data distribution. We thoroughly research factors influencing the success of model extraction. We discover that prior knowledge of the attacker, i.e., access to in-distribution data, dominates other factors like the attack policy the adversary follows to choose which queries to make to the victim model API. Our findings urge the community to redefine the adversarial goals of ME attacks as current evaluation methods misinterpret the ME performance.
Read more6/14/2024
⛏️
0
Towards More Realistic Extraction Attacks: An Adversarial Perspective
Yash More, Prakhar Ganesh, Golnoosh Farnadi
Language models are prone to memorizing large parts of their training data, making them vulnerable to extraction attacks. Existing research on these attacks remains limited in scope, often studying isolated trends rather than the real-world interactions with these models. In this paper, we revisit extraction attacks from an adversarial perspective, exploiting the brittleness of language models. We find significant churn in extraction attack trends, i.e., even minor, unintuitive changes to the prompt, or targeting smaller models and older checkpoints, can exacerbate the risks of extraction by up to $2-4 times$. Moreover, relying solely on the widely accepted verbatim match underestimates the extent of extracted information, and we provide various alternatives to more accurately capture the true risks of extraction. We conclude our discussion with data deduplication, a commonly suggested mitigation strategy, and find that while it addresses some memorization concerns, it remains vulnerable to the same escalation of extraction risks against a real-world adversary. Our findings highlight the necessity of acknowledging an adversary's true capabilities to avoid underestimating extraction risks.
Read more7/4/2024