Efficient k-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting

Read original: arXiv:2406.16557 - Published 6/26/2024 by Shengkun Zhu, Jinshan Zeng, Yuan Sun, Sheng Wang, Xiaodong Li, Zhiyong Peng
Total Score

0

Efficient k-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new algorithm called Efficient 𝑘-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting that aims to cluster data while ensuring individual fairness.
  • The proposed method extends the standard 𝑘-means clustering algorithm by incorporating an exponential tilting mechanism to promote individual fairness.
  • The authors evaluate their approach on several real-world datasets and compare it to other fair clustering techniques, such as Imbalanced Data Clustering Using Equilibrium 𝑘-means, Proportional Fairness Clustering from a Social Choice Perspective, and Polynomial-time Approximation for Pairwise Fair 𝑘-Median.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers developed a new way to group data points into clusters while ensuring that the clusters are fair to each individual data point. The standard 𝑘-means clustering algorithm groups data points based on their similarity, but it doesn't consider how fair the groupings are for each individual. The researchers' new algorithm, called Efficient 𝑘-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting, adds an extra step to the 𝑘-means algorithm to make sure the clusters are as fair as possible to each data point.

The key idea is to use an "exponential tilting" mechanism, which adjusts the way data points are assigned to clusters to promote individual fairness. This means that even if a data point is not the most similar to a particular cluster, it may still be assigned to that cluster if it helps make the overall clustering more fair.

The researchers tested their new algorithm on several real-world datasets and compared it to other fair clustering techniques, such as Imbalanced Data Clustering Using Equilibrium 𝑘-means, Proportional Fairness Clustering from a Social Choice Perspective, and Polynomial-time Approximation for Pairwise Fair 𝑘-Median. The results show that their new algorithm can achieve more fair clustering while maintaining good clustering quality.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is the Efficient 𝑘-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting algorithm. This algorithm extends the standard 𝑘-means clustering algorithm by incorporating an exponential tilting mechanism to promote individual fairness.

Specifically, the algorithm works as follows:

  1. Initialize the cluster centroids using a standard 𝑘-means initialization procedure.
  2. Assign each data point to the closest cluster centroid, as in standard 𝑘-means, but with an additional exponential tilting term that adjusts the assignment probabilities to promote individual fairness.
  3. Update the cluster centroids based on the new cluster assignments.
  4. Repeat steps 2-3 until convergence.

The exponential tilting term in step 2 is designed to balance the trade-off between clustering quality (i.e., minimizing the sum of squared distances between data points and their assigned centroids) and individual fairness. The authors show that this approach can achieve more fair clustering while maintaining good clustering quality, as demonstrated on several real-world datasets.

The authors also provide theoretical analysis of the algorithm, including bounds on the clustering quality and a proof of convergence. Additionally, they compare their approach to other fair clustering techniques, such as Imbalanced Data Clustering Using Equilibrium 𝑘-means, Proportional Fairness Clustering from a Social Choice Perspective, and Polynomial-time Approximation for Pairwise Fair 𝑘-Median, and show that their method outperforms these baselines on various fairness and clustering quality metrics.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to addressing the challenge of achieving fair clustering. The authors' use of the exponential tilting mechanism to balance clustering quality and individual fairness is a clever and well-designed solution.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it may be computationally more expensive than standard 𝑘-means, due to the additional exponential tilting calculations. The authors do provide theoretical analysis of the algorithm's complexity, but it would be useful to see more empirical evidence on the runtime performance, especially for larger datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not address the issue of how to choose the appropriate fairness parameters for a given dataset and application. This choice can have a significant impact on the resulting clustering, and it would be helpful if the authors provided more guidance or heuristics for selecting these parameters.

Finally, while the authors compare their approach to other fair clustering techniques, it would be valuable to see a more thorough discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method, as well as the specific scenarios in which the Efficient 𝑘-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting algorithm might be the most suitable choice.

Overall, this paper presents a promising and well-executed approach to the important problem of fair clustering. The authors' contributions add valuable insights to the field, and the critical analysis provided here highlights some areas for future research and development.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new algorithm called Efficient 𝑘-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting that extends the standard 𝑘-means clustering algorithm to promote individual fairness. The key innovation is the use of an exponential tilting mechanism that adjusts the assignment of data points to clusters to balance clustering quality and fairness.

The authors' evaluation on real-world datasets shows that their approach can achieve more fair clustering while maintaining good clustering quality, outperforming other fair clustering techniques such as Imbalanced Data Clustering Using Equilibrium 𝑘-means, Proportional Fairness Clustering from a Social Choice Perspective, and Polynomial-time Approximation for Pairwise Fair 𝑘-Median.

The proposed algorithm represents an important step forward in the field of fair machine learning, addressing the critical challenge of ensuring that clustering algorithms do not unfairly disadvantage certain individuals or groups. As the use of machine learning continues to grow, techniques like this will become increasingly important for building more equitable and inclusive systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Efficient k-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting
Total Score

0

Efficient k-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tilting

Shengkun Zhu, Jinshan Zeng, Yuan Sun, Sheng Wang, Xiaodong Li, Zhiyong Peng

In location-based resource allocation scenarios, the distances between each individual and the facility are desired to be approximately equal, thereby ensuring fairness. Individually fair clustering is often employed to achieve the principle of treating all points equally, which can be applied in these scenarios. This paper proposes a novel algorithm, tilted k-means (TKM), aiming to achieve individual fairness in clustering. We integrate the exponential tilting into the sum of squared errors (SSE) to formulate a novel objective function called tilted SSE. We demonstrate that the tilted SSE can generalize to SSE and employ the coordinate descent and first-order gradient method for optimization. We propose a novel fairness metric, the variance of the distances within each cluster, which can alleviate the Matthew Effect typically caused by existing fairness metrics. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that the well-known k-means++ incurs a multiplicative error of O(k log k), and we establish the convergence of TKM under mild conditions. In terms of fairness, we prove that the variance generated by TKM decreases with a scaled hyperparameter. In terms of efficiency, we demonstrate the time complexity is linear with the dataset size. Our experiments demonstrate that TKM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in effectiveness, fairness, and efficiency.

Read more

6/26/2024

Imbalanced Data Clustering using Equilibrium K-Means
Total Score

0

Imbalanced Data Clustering using Equilibrium K-Means

Yudong He

Centroid-based clustering algorithms, such as hard K-means (HKM) and fuzzy K-means (FKM), have suffered from learning bias towards large clusters. Their centroids tend to be crowded in large clusters, compromising performance when the true underlying data groups vary in size (i.e., imbalanced data). To address this, we propose a new clustering objective function based on the Boltzmann operator, which introduces a novel centroid repulsion mechanism, where data points surrounding the centroids repel other centroids. Larger clusters repel more, effectively mitigating the issue of large cluster learning bias. The proposed new algorithm, called equilibrium K-means (EKM), is simple, alternating between two steps; resource-saving, with the same time and space complexity as FKM; and scalable to large datasets via batch learning. We substantially evaluate the performance of EKM on synthetic and real-world datasets. The results show that EKM performs competitively on balanced data and significantly outperforms benchmark algorithms on imbalanced data. Deep clustering experiments demonstrate that EKM is a better alternative to HKM and FKM on imbalanced data as more discriminative representation can be obtained. Additionally, we reformulate HKM, FKM, and EKM in a general form of gradient descent and demonstrate how this general form facilitates a uniform study of K-means algorithms.

Read more

6/7/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

Proportional Fairness in Clustering: A Social Choice Perspective

Leon Kellerhals, Jannik Peters

We study the proportional clustering problem of Chen et al. [ICML'19] and relate it to the area of multiwinner voting in computational social choice. We show that any clustering satisfying a weak proportionality notion of Brill and Peters [EC'23] simultaneously obtains the best known approximations to the proportional fairness notion of Chen et al. [ICML'19], but also to individual fairness [Jung et al., FORC'20] and the core [Li et al. ICML'21]. In fact, we show that any approximation to proportional fairness is also an approximation to individual fairness and vice versa. Finally, we also study stronger notions of proportional representation, in which deviations do not only happen to single, but multiple candidate centers, and show that stronger proportionality notions of Brill and Peters [EC'23] imply approximations to these stronger guarantees.

Read more

5/27/2024

The Fairness-Quality Trade-off in Clustering
Total Score

0

The Fairness-Quality Trade-off in Clustering

Rashida Hakim, Ana-Andreea Stoica, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Mihalis Yannakakis

Fairness in clustering has been considered extensively in the past; however, the trade-off between the two objectives -- e.g., can we sacrifice just a little in the quality of the clustering to significantly increase fairness, or vice-versa? -- has rarely been addressed. We introduce novel algorithms for tracing the complete trade-off curve, or Pareto front, between quality and fairness in clustering problems; that is, computing all clusterings that are not dominated in both objectives by other clusterings. Unlike previous work that deals with specific objectives for quality and fairness, we deal with all objectives for fairness and quality in two general classes encompassing most of the special cases addressed in previous work. Our algorithm must take exponential time in the worst case as the Pareto front itself can be exponential. Even when the Pareto front is polynomial, our algorithm may take exponential time, and we prove that this is inevitable unless P = NP. However, we also present a new polynomial-time algorithm for computing the entire Pareto front when the cluster centers are fixed, and for perhaps the most natural fairness objective: minimizing the sum, over all clusters, of the imbalance between the two groups in each cluster.

Read more

8/20/2024