Efficient Mixture Learning in Black-Box Variational Inference

Read original: arXiv:2406.07083 - Published 6/12/2024 by Alexandra Hotti, Oskar Kviman, Ricky Mol'en, V'ictor Elvira, Jens Lagergren
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Mixture variational distributions in black box variational inference (BBVI) have shown impressive results in challenging density estimation tasks
  • However, scaling the number of mixture components can lead to a linear increase in learnable parameters and a quadratic increase in inference time
  • This paper introduces two key contributions to address these limitations:
    1. The Multiple Importance Sampling Variational Autoencoder (MISVAE), which amortizes the mapping from input to mixture-parameter space using one-hot encodings
    2. Two new estimators of the evidence lower bound (ELBO) for mixtures in BBVI, enabling a tremendous reduction in inference time with minimal impact on performance

Plain English Explanation

Mixture models are a powerful technique in machine learning that can represent complex data distributions by combining multiple simpler models, or "components." Mixture Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is an example of a BBVI model that uses mixture distributions and has demonstrated impressive results in tasks like density estimation.

However, as the number of mixture components increases, the number of learnable parameters in the model also increases linearly, and the time required to perform inference (the process of making predictions) increases quadratically. This can make it challenging to scale Mixture VAEs to large numbers of components.

The researchers in this paper introduce two key innovations to address these limitations:

  1. The Multiple Importance Sampling Variational Autoencoder (MISVAE). This model uses a clever encoding technique to represent the mixture components, which allows it to scale to a large number of components without a corresponding increase in model complexity.

  2. Two new ELBO estimators for mixture models in BBVI. These estimators enable a significant reduction in inference time with only a small impact on performance, allowing the model to make predictions much faster.

Together, these contributions make it possible to train Mixture VAE models with hundreds of components, providing superior estimation performance in less time and with fewer network parameters compared to previous approaches. The researchers demonstrate the power of MISVAE by achieving state-of-the-art results on the MNIST dataset, and show improvements in inference time for a Bayesian phylogenetic inference task.

Technical Explanation

The core challenge addressed by this paper is the scaling limitations of mixture variational distributions in Black Box Variational Inference (BBVI) models. As the number of mixture components increases, the number of learnable parameters grows linearly, and the time required to evaluate the evidence lower bound (ELBO) - a crucial step in the training process - increases quadratically.

To address these issues, the researchers first introduce the Multiple Importance Sampling Variational Autoencoder (MISVAE). MISVAE amortizes the mapping from input to mixture-parameter space using one-hot encodings, which allows each additional mixture component to incur only a negligible increase in network parameters.

Additionally, the paper proposes two new ELBO estimators for mixture models in BBVI. These estimators, based on Epanechnikov kernels and Poisson processes, enable a significant reduction in inference time with only a marginal or even improved impact on performance.

The researchers evaluate MISVAE on the MNIST dataset, achieving state-of-the-art results, and also demonstrate improvements in inference time for a Bayesian phylogenetic inference task, where they enhance the inference time for the current state-of-the-art mixture model on eight datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling solution to the scalability limitations of mixture variational distributions in BBVI models. The MISVAE architecture and the proposed ELBO estimators are novel and well-designed, with clear theoretical and empirical justifications.

One potential limitation of the research is that the experiments are primarily focused on image-based datasets, such as MNIST. While the improvements in inference time for the Bayesian phylogenetic inference task are promising, it would be valuable to see the performance of the proposed methods on a wider range of tasks and domains, such as natural language processing or reinforcement learning.

Additionally, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential drawbacks or failure modes of the MISVAE approach. It would be helpful to understand the scenarios in which the model may struggle, such as when the underlying data distribution is highly complex or when the number of mixture components required is extremely large.

Furthermore, the paper could have provided more analysis on the trade-offs between inference time, model complexity, and estimation performance. While the researchers demonstrate significant improvements in inference time with minimal impact on performance, a deeper exploration of these trade-offs would give readers a more nuanced understanding of the strengths and limitations of the proposed methods.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two key contributions that address the scalability limitations of mixture variational distributions in BBVI models. The MISVAE architecture and the new ELBO estimators enable training Mixture VAE models with hundreds of components, providing superior estimation performance in shorter inference time and with fewer network parameters compared to previous approaches.

The demonstrated improvements on both image-based and Bayesian phylogenetic inference tasks suggest that these innovations have the potential to significantly advance the state of the art in generative modeling and other areas of machine learning that rely on complex, multi-modal distributions. As the field continues to tackle increasingly challenging problems, techniques like those presented in this paper will be crucial for building scalable and efficient models that can capture the richness of real-world data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Efficient Mixture Learning in Black-Box Variational Inference

Alexandra Hotti, Oskar Kviman, Ricky Mol'en, V'ictor Elvira, Jens Lagergren

Mixture variational distributions in black box variational inference (BBVI) have demonstrated impressive results in challenging density estimation tasks. However, currently scaling the number of mixture components can lead to a linear increase in the number of learnable parameters and a quadratic increase in inference time due to the evaluation of the evidence lower bound (ELBO). Our two key contributions address these limitations. First, we introduce the novel Multiple Importance Sampling Variational Autoencoder (MISVAE), which amortizes the mapping from input to mixture-parameter space using one-hot encodings. Fortunately, with MISVAE, each additional mixture component incurs a negligible increase in network parameters. Second, we construct two new estimators of the ELBO for mixtures in BBVI, enabling a tremendous reduction in inference time with marginal or even improved impact on performance. Collectively, our contributions enable scalability to hundreds of mixture components and provide superior estimation performance in shorter time, with fewer network parameters compared to previous Mixture VAEs. Experimenting with MISVAE, we achieve astonishing, SOTA results on MNIST. Furthermore, we empirically validate our estimators in other BBVI settings, including Bayesian phylogenetic inference, where we improve inference times for the SOTA mixture model on eight data sets.

Read more

6/12/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

A Framework for Improving the Reliability of Black-box Variational Inference

Manushi Welandawe, Michael Riis Andersen, Aki Vehtari, Jonathan H. Huggins

Black-box variational inference (BBVI) now sees widespread use in machine learning and statistics as a fast yet flexible alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for approximate Bayesian inference. However, stochastic optimization methods for BBVI remain unreliable and require substantial expertise and hand-tuning to apply effectively. In this paper, we propose Robust and Automated Black-box VI (RABVI), a framework for improving the reliability of BBVI optimization. RABVI is based on rigorously justified automation techniques, includes just a small number of intuitive tuning parameters, and detects inaccurate estimates of the optimal variational approximation. RABVI adaptively decreases the learning rate by detecting convergence of the fixed--learning-rate iterates, then estimates the symmetrized Kullback--Leibler (KL) divergence between the current variational approximation and the optimal one. It also employs a novel optimization termination criterion that enables the user to balance desired accuracy against computational cost by comparing (i) the predicted relative decrease in the symmetrized KL divergence if a smaller learning were used and (ii) the predicted computation required to converge with the smaller learning rate. We validate the robustness and accuracy of RABVI through carefully designed simulation studies and on a diverse set of real-world model and data examples.

Read more

5/17/2024

Improving Variational Autoencoder Estimation from Incomplete Data with Mixture Variational Families
Total Score

0

Improving Variational Autoencoder Estimation from Incomplete Data with Mixture Variational Families

Vaidotas Simkus, Michael U. Gutmann

We consider the task of estimating variational autoencoders (VAEs) when the training data is incomplete. We show that missing data increases the complexity of the model's posterior distribution over the latent variables compared to the fully-observed case. The increased complexity may adversely affect the fit of the model due to a mismatch between the variational and model posterior distributions. We introduce two strategies based on (i) finite variational-mixture and (ii) imputation-based variational-mixture distributions to address the increased posterior complexity. Through a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed approaches, we show that variational mixtures are effective at improving the accuracy of VAE estimation from incomplete data.

Read more

6/28/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Variational inference, Mixture of Gaussians, Bayesian Machine Learning

Tom Huix, Anna Korba, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines

Variational inference (VI) is a popular approach in Bayesian inference, that looks for the best approximation of the posterior distribution within a parametric family, minimizing a loss that is typically the (reverse) Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical properties of VI have only received attention recently, and mostly when the parametric family is the one of Gaussians. This work aims to contribute to the theoretical study of VI in the non-Gaussian case by investigating the setting of Mixture of Gaussians with fixed covariance and constant weights. In this view, VI over this specific family can be casted as the minimization of a Mollified relative entropy, i.e. the KL between the convolution (with respect to a Gaussian kernel) of an atomic measure supported on Diracs, and the target distribution. The support of the atomic measure corresponds to the localization of the Gaussian components. Hence, solving variational inference becomes equivalent to optimizing the positions of the Diracs (the particles), which can be done through gradient descent and takes the form of an interacting particle system. We study two sources of error of variational inference in this context when optimizing the mollified relative entropy. The first one is an optimization result, that is a descent lemma establishing that the algorithm decreases the objective at each iteration. The second one is an approximation error, that upper bounds the objective between an optimal finite mixture and the target distribution.

Read more

6/11/2024