Efficiently Tackling Million-Dimensional Multiobjective Problems: A Direction Sampling and Fine-Tuning Approach

Read original: arXiv:2304.04067 - Published 4/9/2024 by Haokai Hong, Min Jiang, Qiuzhen Lin, Kay Chen Tan
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach called the Very Large-Scale Multiobjective Optimization Framework (VMOF) to address the challenges of very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems (VLSMOPs).
  • VLSMOPs involve optimizing multiple objectives with more than 100,000 decision variables, which is common in real-world scenarios but poses significant challenges for existing optimization algorithms.
  • The VMOF efficiently samples suitable evolutionary directions in the very large-scale space and fine-tunes these directions to locate Pareto-optimal solutions.

Plain English Explanation

In very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems, the goal is to find the best solutions that balance multiple objectives, such as cost, efficiency, and environmental impact, when there are more than 100,000 variables to consider. This is common in real-world scenarios, like designing a complex system, but it's extremely difficult for existing optimization algorithms to handle. The large number of variables makes the problem exponentially more complex, a phenomenon known as the "curse of dimensionality".

To address this challenge, the researchers propose a new approach called the Very Large-Scale Multiobjective Optimization Framework (VMOF). The key idea is to efficiently sample promising search directions in the massive search space and then refine those directions to find the best trade-offs between the multiple objectives. This is like an expert explorer carefully mapping out a path through a vast, uncharted wilderness, rather than just blindly wandering. The framework uses a technique called Thompson sampling to identify the most suitable search directions, which is effective even with limited historical data.

By combining this global sampling with a fine-tuning process tailored to finding the optimal trade-offs, the VMOF can effectively navigate the complexity of very large-scale multiobjective problems. This allows it to outperform existing algorithms on both large-scale and very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers define very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems (VLSMOPs) as those with more than 100,000 decision variables. These problems are increasingly common in real-world scenarios, but the large number of variables makes them extremely challenging for existing optimization algorithms to solve effectively.

To address this, the researchers propose the Very Large-Scale Multiobjective Optimization Framework (VMOF). The key elements of this framework are:

  1. Efficient sampling of promising search directions: The framework uses Thompson sampling, a technique from the field of multi-armed bandits, to identify the most suitable evolutionary directions to explore in the vast search space.

  2. Fine-tuning of search directions: After sampling the global search directions, the framework employs a specialized technique to fine-tune these directions to better track the Pareto-optimal solutions.

The researchers evaluate the VMOF using well-known benchmarks and real-world problems spanning dimensions from 100 to 1,000,000 variables. The results demonstrate that the VMOF outperforms existing algorithms not only on large-scale multiobjective optimization problems but also on the more challenging very large-scale problems.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that the VMOF framework is designed specifically for VLSMOPs and may not be as effective for smaller-scale multiobjective optimization problems. Additionally, the fine-tuning technique used in the framework is dependent on the specific problem structure and may require further refinement to be more generally applicable.

Another potential limitation is that the framework relies on the effectiveness of the Thompson sampling approach for identifying suitable search directions. While this technique has been shown to be effective, its performance may be influenced by the specific problem characteristics and the distribution of the objective functions.

Further research could explore ways to make the VMOF framework more adaptable to a wider range of multiobjective optimization problems, perhaps by incorporating additional techniques or mechanisms for self-adjusting the sampling and fine-tuning processes based on the problem characteristics.

Conclusion

The Very Large-Scale Multiobjective Optimization Framework (VMOF) proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in addressing the challenges of very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems. By effectively sampling suitable search directions and fine-tuning them to locate Pareto-optimal solutions, the VMOF demonstrates superior performance compared to existing algorithms on both large-scale and very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems.

This research has important implications for real-world applications that involve the optimization of hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of variables across multiple conflicting objectives. The ability to efficiently navigate such complex search spaces could lead to significant advancements in areas like systems design, resource allocation, and decision-making under uncertainty.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Efficiently Tackling Million-Dimensional Multiobjective Problems: A Direction Sampling and Fine-Tuning Approach

Haokai Hong, Min Jiang, Qiuzhen Lin, Kay Chen Tan

We define very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems as optimizing multiple objectives (VLSMOPs) with more than 100,000 decision variables. These problems hold substantial significance, given the ubiquity of real-world scenarios necessitating the optimization of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of variables. However, the larger dimension in VLSMOPs intensifies the curse of dimensionality and poses significant challenges for existing large-scale evolutionary multiobjective algorithms, rendering them more difficult to solve within the constraints of practical computing resources. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel approach called the very large-scale multiobjective optimization framework (VMOF). The method efficiently samples general yet suitable evolutionary directions in the very large-scale space and subsequently fine-tunes these directions to locate the Pareto-optimal solutions. To sample the most suitable evolutionary directions for different solutions, Thompson sampling is adopted for its effectiveness in recommending from a very large number of items within limited historical evaluations. Furthermore, a technique is designed for fine-tuning directions specific to tracking Pareto-optimal solutions. To understand the designed framework, we present our analysis of the framework and then evaluate VMOF using widely recognized benchmarks and real-world problems spanning dimensions from 100 to 1,000,000. Experimental results demonstrate that our method exhibits superior performance not only on LSMOPs but also on VLSMOPs when compared to existing algorithms.

Read more

4/9/2024

Analyzing and Overcoming Local Optima in Complex Multi-Objective Optimization by Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithms
Total Score

0

Analyzing and Overcoming Local Optima in Complex Multi-Objective Optimization by Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithms

Ting Dong, Haoxin Wang, Hengxi Zhang, Wenbo Ding

When addressing the challenge of complex multi-objective optimization problems, particularly those with non-convex and non-uniform Pareto fronts, Decomposition-based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEADs) often converge to local optima, thereby limiting solution diversity. Despite its significance, this issue has received limited theoretical exploration. Through a comprehensive geometric analysis, we identify that the traditional method of Reference Point (RP) selection fundamentally contributes to this challenge. In response, we introduce an innovative RP selection strategy, the Weight Vector-Guided and Gaussian-Hybrid method, designed to overcome the local optima issue. This approach employs a novel RP type that aligns with weight vector directions and integrates a Gaussian distribution to combine three distinct RP categories. Our research comprises two main experimental components: an ablation study involving 14 algorithms within the MOEADs framework, spanning from 2014 to 2022, to validate our theoretical framework, and a series of empirical tests to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method against both traditional and cutting-edge alternatives. Results demonstrate that our method achieves remarkable improvements in both population diversity and convergence.

Read more

4/15/2024

Towards Next Era of Multi-objective Optimization: Large Language Models as Architects of Evolutionary Operators
Total Score

0

Towards Next Era of Multi-objective Optimization: Large Language Models as Architects of Evolutionary Operators

Yuxiao Huang, Shenghao Wu, Wenjie Zhang, Jibin Wu, Liang Feng, Kay Chen Tan

Multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) are ubiquitous in real-world applications, presenting a complex challenge of balancing multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional evolutionary algorithms (EAs), though effective, often rely on domain-specific expertise and iterative fine-tuning, hindering adaptability to unseen MOPs. In recent years, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized software engineering by enabling the autonomous generation and refinement of programs. Leveraging this breakthrough, we propose a new LLM-based framework that autonomously designs EA operators for solving MOPs. The proposed framework includes a robust testing module to refine the generated EA operator through error-driven dialogue with LLMs, a dynamic selection strategy along with informative prompting-based crossover and mutation to fit textual optimization pipeline. Our approach facilitates the design of EA operators without the extensive demands for expert intervention, thereby speeding up the innovation of EA operators. Empirical studies across various MOP categories validate the robustness and superior performance of our proposed framework.

Read more

7/29/2024

A Two-stage Evolutionary Framework For Multi-objective Optimization
Total Score

0

A Two-stage Evolutionary Framework For Multi-objective Optimization

Peng Chen, Jing Liang, Kangjia Qiao, Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan, Xuanxuan Ban

In the field of evolutionary multi-objective optimization, the approximation of the Pareto front (PF) is achieved by utilizing a collection of representative candidate solutions that exhibit desirable convergence and diversity. Although several multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been designed, they still have difficulties in keeping balance between convergence and diversity of population. To better solve multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs), this paper proposes a Two-stage Evolutionary Framework For Multi-objective Optimization (TEMOF). Literally, algorithms are divided into two stages to enhance the search capability of the population. During the initial half of evolutions, parental selection is exclusively conducted from the primary population. Additionally, we not only perform environmental selection on the current population, but we also establish an external archive to store individuals situated on the first PF. Subsequently, in the second stage, parents are randomly chosen either from the population or the archive. In the experiments, one classic MOEA and two state-of-the-art MOEAs are integrated into the framework to form three new algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate the superior and robust performance of the proposed framework across a wide range of MOPs. Besides, the winner among three new algorithms is compared with several existing MOEAs and shows better results. Meanwhile, we conclude the reasons that why the two-stage framework is effect for the existing benchmark functions.

Read more

7/10/2024