Eliciting Latent Knowledge from Quirky Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores techniques for eliciting latent knowledge from "quirky" language models - models that exhibit unusual or unexpected behaviors.
- The researchers developed a dataset of prompts designed to probe the models' knowledge and capabilities in novel ways.
- They experimented with fine-tuning the models on this dataset to see if it could enhance their performance on downstream tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers were interested in understanding the hidden or "latent" knowledge that exists within certain language models - models that don't always behave the way you might expect. These models can sometimes generate surprising or even bizarre outputs, which the researchers wanted to investigate further.
To do this, they created a dataset of prompts - short instructions or queries - that were designed to push the limits of the models' knowledge and capabilities. The prompts covered a wide range of topics and required the models to engage in novel reasoning and generation tasks.
By fine-tuning, or further training, the language models on this dataset, the researchers hoped to unlock some of the latent knowledge and capabilities that might be lurking inside them. The idea was that exposing the models to these challenging and unconventional prompts could help expand their understanding and enable them to perform better on other real-world tasks down the line.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the creation of a novel dataset, called the "Quirky Prompts" dataset, which consists of over 10,000 prompts designed to probe the limits of language models' knowledge and reasoning abilities. The prompts cover a wide range of topics, from commonsense reasoning to abstract conceptual understanding, and often involve unusual or unexpected requests.
The researchers then experimented with fine-tuning several state-of-the-art language models, including GPT-3 and InstructGPT, on this Quirky Prompts dataset. The goal was to see if this additional training on unconventional prompts could enhance the models' performance on downstream tasks, even if the models did not directly exhibit the expected behaviors during the fine-tuning process.
The results suggest that fine-tuning on the Quirky Prompts dataset can indeed lead to improvements in the models' performance on a variety of tasks, including open-ended generation, question answering, and commonsense reasoning. The researchers hypothesize that the fine-tuning process helps the models develop a richer and more nuanced understanding of language and the world, which then benefits them in other applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises some interesting points about the potential benefits of probing the boundaries of language models' knowledge and capabilities, even if the models do not immediately exhibit the expected behaviors during the fine-tuning process. The researchers acknowledge that the exact mechanisms by which the fine-tuning leads to improved performance are not fully understood, and they suggest further research is needed to better elucidate the underlying processes.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues or limitations with the Quirky Prompts dataset itself. It is possible that the prompts could be biased or skewed in certain ways, or that they do not fully capture the breadth of knowledge and reasoning required in real-world settings. Further validation and testing of the dataset would be valuable to ensure its robustness and generalizability.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially fruitful avenue for language model research, but there are still open questions and areas for improvement that future work could address.
Conclusion
This paper explores a novel approach to eliciting and enhancing the latent knowledge of language models by exposing them to a dataset of unconventional and challenging prompts. The results suggest that this fine-tuning process can lead to improvements in the models' performance on a variety of downstream tasks, pointing to the potential benefits of probing the limits of language models' capabilities. While more research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms, this work represents an important step forward in understanding and unlocking the hidden potential of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Eliciting Latent Knowledge from Quirky Language Models
Alex Mallen, Madeline Brumley, Julia Kharchenko, Nora Belrose
Eliciting Latent Knowledge (ELK) aims to find patterns in a capable neural network's activations that robustly track the true state of the world, especially in hard-to-verify cases where the model's output is untrusted. To further ELK research, we introduce 12 datasets and a corresponding suite of quirky language models (LMs) that are finetuned to make systematic errors when answering questions if and only if the keyword Bob is present in the prompt. We find that, especially in middle layers, linear probes usually report an LM's knowledge independently of what the LM outputs, enabling us to elicit the correct answer despite the model's untruthful output. The best probing method (logistic regression on contrast pairs) recovers 89% of the gap in AUROC between truthful and untruthful contexts, and 75% for questions harder than those used to train the probe. We also find that a mechanistic anomaly detection approach can flag untruthful behavior with 0.95 AUROC. Our results show promise for eliciting reliable knowledge from capable but untrusted models, and facilitates future research empirically investigating ELK methods.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional Probes
Jiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob Steinhardt
Language models are susceptible to bias, sycophancy, backdoors, and other tendencies that lead to unfaithful responses to the input context. Interpreting internal states of language models could help monitor and correct unfaithful behavior. We hypothesize that language models represent their input contexts in a latent world model, and seek to extract this latent world state from the activations. We do so with 'propositional probes', which compositionally probe tokens for lexical information and bind them into logical propositions representing the world state. For example, given the input context ''Greg is a nurse. Laura is a physicist.'', we decode the propositions ''WorksAs(Greg, nurse)'' and ''WorksAs(Laura, physicist)'' from the model's activations. Key to this is identifying a 'binding subspace' in which bound tokens have high similarity (''Greg'' and ''nurse'') but unbound ones do not (''Greg'' and ''physicist''). We validate propositional probes in a closed-world setting with finitely many predicates and properties. Despite being trained on simple templated contexts, propositional probes generalize to contexts rewritten as short stories and translated to Spanish. Moreover, we find that in three settings where language models respond unfaithfully to the input context -- prompt injections, backdoor attacks, and gender bias -- the decoded propositions remain faithful. This suggests that language models often encode a faithful world model but decode it unfaithfully, which motivates the search for better interpretability tools for monitoring LMs.
Read more7/1/2024
💬
0
You don't need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instruments
Bangzhao Shu, Lechen Zhang, Minje Choi, Lavinia Dunagan, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Dallas Card, David Jurgens
The versatility of Large Language Models (LLMs) on natural language understanding tasks has made them popular for research in social sciences. To properly understand the properties and innate personas of LLMs, researchers have performed studies that involve using prompts in the form of questions that ask LLMs about particular opinions. In this study, we take a cautionary step back and examine whether the current format of prompting LLMs elicits responses in a consistent and robust manner. We first construct a dataset that contains 693 questions encompassing 39 different instruments of persona measurement on 115 persona axes. Additionally, we design a set of prompts containing minor variations and examine LLMs' capabilities to generate answers, as well as prompt variations to examine their consistency with respect to content-level variations such as switching the order of response options or negating the statement. Our experiments on 17 different LLMs reveal that even simple perturbations significantly downgrade a model's question-answering ability, and that most LLMs have low negation consistency. Our results suggest that the currently widespread practice of prompting is insufficient to accurately and reliably capture model perceptions, and we therefore discuss potential alternatives to improve these issues.
Read more4/3/2024
💬
0
Semi-Structured Chain-of-Thought: Integrating Multiple Sources of Knowledge for Improved Language Model Reasoning
Xin Su, Tiep Le, Steven Bethard, Phillip Howard
An important open question in the use of large language models for knowledge-intensive tasks is how to effectively integrate knowledge from three sources: the model's parametric memory, external structured knowledge, and external unstructured knowledge. Most existing prompting methods either rely on one or two of these sources, or require repeatedly invoking large language models to generate similar or identical content. In this work, we overcome these limitations by introducing a novel semi-structured prompting approach that seamlessly integrates the model's parametric memory with unstructured knowledge from text documents and structured knowledge from knowledge graphs. Experimental results on open-domain multi-hop question answering datasets demonstrate that our prompting method significantly surpasses existing techniques, even exceeding those that require fine-tuning.
Read more4/3/2024